On 10/23/11 4:47 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/10/2011 9:23 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/23/11 11:17 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleBqadnWpBW99_sDnTnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...

On 10/23/11 11:03 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/23/2011 10:53 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In article977c8b69-8d0c-447b-8809-991c58843609
@m1g2000vbm.googlegroups.com, says...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPQjn...eature=related

Isn't that you with the bull horn, Herr Krause?

Looks to me like the dude in the white shirt started the
confrontation,
even though I have no use for any union that acts like that.

The union thug escalated the interaction to a physical altercation.

Does that surprise you?

All the "union thuggery" since time began doesn't add up to a year of
"corporate thuggery."

What a great comeback Krause. They did it first! You sound like a child.



Corporations not only "did it first," they are still doing it and to a
greater degree than all the unions have since the beginning of time.
Of course, you boys don't know what the word "thug" means. The word
derives from Hindi, and it includes "cheats" and "swindlers" in its
first definitions.

Halliburton - thugs.

Why? Because they provide jobs and people have to take them?

Whoooooooosh! Are you after Scotty's rice bowl?