In article ,
says...

On 10/23/2011 11:08 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/23/11 11:03 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/23/2011 10:53 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In article977c8b69-8d0c-447b-8809-991c58843609
@m1g2000vbm.googlegroups.com, says...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPQjn...eature=related

Isn't that you with the bull horn, Herr Krause?

Looks to me like the dude in the white shirt started the confrontation,
even though I have no use for any union that acts like that.

The union thug escalated the interaction to a physical altercation.

Does that surprise you?

All the "union thuggery" since time began doesn't add up to a year of
"corporate thuggery."

I am sure there is plenty of video of corporate types out there picking
on little kids and wives, holding baseball bats right?

So, do you think what the corporate rich is doing is okay?

On 22/10/2011 7:29 PM, TopBassDog wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPQjn...eature=related

Isn't that you with the bull horn, Herr Krause?

Guess the national socialists are using black this time around. Just
union bully fleabaggers needing unemployment to fix their attitude.

Teamster boys also look like skin heads, my does history repeat or what?
Nazi skin head rally by night, Teamster by day.
--
Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But
we have big huge government we can't afford...
-- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude

On 23/10/2011 8:53 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In article977c8b69-8d0c-447b-8809-991c58843609
@m1g2000vbm.googlegroups.com, says...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPQjn...eature=related

Isn't that you with the bull horn, Herr Krause?

Looks to me like the dude in the white shirt started the confrontation,
even though I have no use for any union that acts like that.

The union thug escalated the interaction to a physical altercation.

More than escalated, instigated. He approached the fight, tossed the
first push. Just a union bully.
--
Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But
we have big huge government we can't afford...
-- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude

On 23/10/2011 9:08 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/23/11 11:03 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/23/2011 10:53 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In article977c8b69-8d0c-447b-8809-991c58843609
@m1g2000vbm.googlegroups.com, says...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPQjn...eature=related

Isn't that you with the bull horn, Herr Krause?

Looks to me like the dude in the white shirt started the confrontation,
even though I have no use for any union that acts like that.

The union thug escalated the interaction to a physical altercation.

Does that surprise you?

All the "union thuggery" since time began doesn't add up to a year of
"corporate thuggery."

I don't know, union corruption is every where and goes back a long time.

http://nlpc.org/union-corruption-update

Yep, liberal-socialists are against bullying unless of course they are
the ones doing the bullying.
--
Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But
we have big huge government we can't afford...
-- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude

On 23/10/2011 9:23 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/23/11 11:17 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleBqadnWpBW99_sDnTnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...

On 10/23/11 11:03 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/23/2011 10:53 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In article977c8b69-8d0c-447b-8809-991c58843609
@m1g2000vbm.googlegroups.com, says...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPQjn...eature=related

Isn't that you with the bull horn, Herr Krause?

Looks to me like the dude in the white shirt started the
confrontation,
even though I have no use for any union that acts like that.

The union thug escalated the interaction to a physical altercation.

Does that surprise you?

All the "union thuggery" since time began doesn't add up to a year of
"corporate thuggery."

What a great comeback Krause. They did it first! You sound like a child.



Corporations not only "did it first," they are still doing it and to a
greater degree than all the unions have since the beginning of time.
Of course, you boys don't know what the word "thug" means. The word
derives from Hindi, and it includes "cheats" and "swindlers" in its
first definitions.

Halliburton - thugs.

Why? Because they provide jobs and people have to take them?
--
Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But
we have big huge government we can't afford...
-- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude

On 23/10/2011 12:05 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/23/2011 11:08 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/23/11 11:03 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/23/2011 10:53 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In article977c8b69-8d0c-447b-8809-991c58843609
@m1g2000vbm.googlegroups.com, says...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPQjn...eature=related

Isn't that you with the bull horn, Herr Krause?

Looks to me like the dude in the white shirt started the confrontation,
even though I have no use for any union that acts like that.

The union thug escalated the interaction to a physical altercation.

Does that surprise you?

All the "union thuggery" since time began doesn't add up to a year of
"corporate thuggery."

I am sure there is plenty of video of corporate types out there picking
on little kids and wives, holding baseball bats right?

So, do you think what the corporate rich is doing is okay?

Depends, are they crooked or honest?

Crooked, go hang them for all I care. Just look at the bailouts 0bama
gives out and go for them. Those are the corrupt ones, corrupt bailouts
our grand kids will have to pay for.

Honest ones, leave them be. They provide free of bailout and free of
taxpayer rape investment capital for jobs. If they are not investing
right now, could be because they are also worried be they corrupt people
or corrupt government they will loose it.

Lots of honest rich out there that made it fairly without ****ing people
over.
--
Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But
we have big huge government we can't afford...
-- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude

On 10/23/11 4:47 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 23/10/2011 9:23 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/23/11 11:17 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleBqadnWpBW99_sDnTnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...

On 10/23/11 11:03 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/23/2011 10:53 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In article977c8b69-8d0c-447b-8809-991c58843609
@m1g2000vbm.googlegroups.com, says...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPQjn...eature=related

Isn't that you with the bull horn, Herr Krause?

Looks to me like the dude in the white shirt started the
confrontation,
even though I have no use for any union that acts like that.

The union thug escalated the interaction to a physical altercation.

Does that surprise you?

All the "union thuggery" since time began doesn't add up to a year of
"corporate thuggery."

What a great comeback Krause. They did it first! You sound like a child.



Corporations not only "did it first," they are still doing it and to a
greater degree than all the unions have since the beginning of time.
Of course, you boys don't know what the word "thug" means. The word
derives from Hindi, and it includes "cheats" and "swindlers" in its
first definitions.

Halliburton - thugs.

Why? Because they provide jobs and people have to take them?

Whoooooooosh! Are you after Scotty's rice bowl?

On 10/23/2011 11:48 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/23/11 11:40 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/23/2011 11:08 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/23/11 11:03 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/23/2011 10:53 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In article977c8b69-8d0c-447b-8809-991c58843609
@m1g2000vbm.googlegroups.com, says...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPQjn...eature=related

Isn't that you with the bull horn, Herr Krause?

Looks to me like the dude in the white shirt started the
confrontation,
even though I have no use for any union that acts like that.

The union thug escalated the interaction to a physical altercation.

Does that surprise you?

All the "union thuggery" since time began doesn't add up to a year of
"corporate thuggery."

I am sure there is plenty of video of corporate types out there picking
on little kids and wives, holding baseball bats right?

D'oh. You need something more than the Wonderbook Dictionary to know
what "thug" and "thuggery" mean.

Maybe, but even more, I know when I see it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPQjnPhIvDo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7L_cuQJ1pQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zm_Fl3AszuU

and this guy should have been shot

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUxjahek0f8

So, show me the tea party acting like little bitches like these cowardly
pieces of ****?

"X ` Man" wrote in message
m...


Corporations not only "did it first," they are still doing it and to a
greater degree than all the unions have since the beginning of time.
Of course, you boys don't know what the word "thug" means. The word
derives from Hindi, and it includes "cheats" and "swindlers" in its
first definitions.

Halliburton - thugs.

---------------------------------------------------------

Gee. Just think of a world without big, bad corporations.
There would be no need for unions .....
because there would be no jobs.

No jobs .... no taxes ....
no taxes .... no entitlements ...
no Social Security ..... no Health Insurance .... no health care ....
no anything.

Big, bad corporations.

On 10/23/2011 10:09 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"X ` Man" wrote in message
m...


Corporations not only "did it first," they are still doing it and to a
greater degree than all the unions have since the beginning of time.
Of course, you boys don't know what the word "thug" means. The word
derives from Hindi, and it includes "cheats" and "swindlers" in its
first definitions.

Halliburton - thugs.

---------------------------------------------------------

Gee. Just think of a world without big, bad corporations.
There would be no need for unions .....
because there would be no jobs.

No jobs .... no taxes ....
no taxes .... no entitlements ...
no Social Security ..... no Health Insurance .... no health care ....
no anything.

Big, bad corporations.


Well, if you think about it. Unions are the one thing in that list we
don't really need...