On 09/09/2011 8:03 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 9/9/2011 9:29 AM, Drifter wrote:
On 9/9/2011 7:46 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:58:55 -0700, JR North
wrote:

Sooooory O' grinning idiot One;
we needed 'IT' 3 years ago, not now, when you suddenly realize you
might not get re-elected.
JR
HOME PAGE:
http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
--------------------------------------------------

You try working with obstructionist assholes as your supposed partners
and see how much you can get done.

My guess is that any reasonable person might have shot a few of them
by now or at least found a way to have them dropped in the ocean,
accidently.

Obama had a majority of D's in the House and Senate for two years. Why
didn't he take advantage of it?

He hadn't learned at that point that he wasn't supposed to write all the
laws and make all the critical decisions. I think he's learning now.

To even address the "obstructionist" charade is ridiculous. Each and
every person here knows Obama came in screaming "elections have
consequences" and since then has shut out republicans, and dismissed any
input or plans they have for purely political reasons...

Yep, you can have democracy as long as I get more unrestricted debt-spend.
--
First rule of holes: If your in one, don't keep digging.
So in the hole, why do we insanely want more debt?

On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 07:46:01 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:58:55 -0700, JR North
wrote:

Sooooory O' grinning idiot One;
we needed 'IT' 3 years ago, not now, when you suddenly realize you
might not get re-elected.
JR
HOME PAGE:
http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
--------------------------------------------------

You try working with obstructionist assholes as your supposed partners
and see how much you can get done.

My guess is that any reasonable person might have shot a few of them
by now or at least found a way to have them dropped in the ocean,
accidently.

Obama had a majority of D's in the House and Senate for two years. Why
didn't he take advantage of it?

It's a good question. Unfortunately, unlike Republicans, who march in
line, Dems don't do that. They tend to be all over the map on lots of
different things. Also, they didn't sign an asinine pledge from
Grover.

On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:10:29 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/09/2011 6:56 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Sep 9, 7:46 am, wrote:
In ,
says...











On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:58:55 -0700, JR North
wrote:

Sooooory O' grinning idiot One;
we needed 'IT' 3 years ago, not now, when you suddenly realize you
might not get re-elected.
JR
HOME PAGE:
http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
--------------------------------------------------

You try working with obstructionist assholes as your supposed partners
and see how much you can get done.

My guess is that any reasonable person might have shot a few of them
by now or at least found a way to have them dropped in the ocean,
accidently.

Obama had a majority of D's in the House and Senate for two years. Why
didn't he take advantage of it?

Because he just doesn't have a clue what to do. The guy never did
anything in his life but blow smoke...

Could be just that. Obama doesn't know what the **** to do so he relies
on big statism civil service types for all his thinking.

Because I will say this, it is a shame he is being such a ****up.

Yes, we know you're a moron.

On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:08:57 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/09/2011 5:46 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:58:55 -0700, JR North
wrote:

Sooooory O' grinning idiot One;
we needed 'IT' 3 years ago, not now, when you suddenly realize you
might not get re-elected.
JR
HOME PAGE:
http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
--------------------------------------------------

You try working with obstructionist assholes as your supposed partners
and see how much you can get done.

My guess is that any reasonable person might have shot a few of them
by now or at least found a way to have them dropped in the ocean,
accidently.

Obama had a majority of D's in the House and Senate for two years. Why
didn't he take advantage of it?

The do nothing is Obama. Aside from being motor mouth, he is all talk
and no action.

You're such a big little man.

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:10:29 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/09/2011 6:56 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Sep 9, 7:46 am, wrote:
In ,
says...











On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:58:55 -0700, JR North
wrote:

Sooooory O' grinning idiot One;
we needed 'IT' 3 years ago, not now, when you suddenly realize you
might not get re-elected.
JR
HOME PAGE:
http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
--------------------------------------------------

You try working with obstructionist assholes as your supposed partners
and see how much you can get done.

My guess is that any reasonable person might have shot a few of them
by now or at least found a way to have them dropped in the ocean,
accidently.

Obama had a majority of D's in the House and Senate for two years. Why
didn't he take advantage of it?

Because he just doesn't have a clue what to do. The guy never did
anything in his life but blow smoke...

Could be just that. Obama doesn't know what the **** to do so he relies
on big statism civil service types for all his thinking.

Because I will say this, it is a shame he is being such a ****up.

Yes, we know you're a moron.

Polly want a cracker?

On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:29:31 -0400, Drifter wrote:

On 9/9/2011 7:46 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:58:55 -0700, JR North
wrote:

Sooooory O' grinning idiot One;
we needed 'IT' 3 years ago, not now, when you suddenly realize you
might not get re-elected.
JR
HOME PAGE:
http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
--------------------------------------------------

You try working with obstructionist assholes as your supposed partners
and see how much you can get done.

My guess is that any reasonable person might have shot a few of them
by now or at least found a way to have them dropped in the ocean,
accidently.

Obama had a majority of D's in the House and Senate for two years. Why
didn't he take advantage of it?

He hadn't learned at that point that he wasn't supposed to write all the
laws and make all the critical decisions. I think he's learning now.

The Dems like to discuss and find the best route, sometimes to a
fault. We don't automatically default to whatever benefits the rich
and global corporatists.

Lacking consciousness and any obligation to fellow men offers a big
advantage to Republicans.

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:29:31 -0400, Drifter wrote:

On 9/9/2011 7:46 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:58:55 -0700, JR North
wrote:

Sooooory O' grinning idiot One;
we needed 'IT' 3 years ago, not now, when you suddenly realize you
might not get re-elected.
JR
HOME PAGE:
http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
--------------------------------------------------

You try working with obstructionist assholes as your supposed partners
and see how much you can get done.

My guess is that any reasonable person might have shot a few of them
by now or at least found a way to have them dropped in the ocean,
accidently.

Obama had a majority of D's in the House and Senate for two years. Why
didn't he take advantage of it?

He hadn't learned at that point that he wasn't supposed to write all the
laws and make all the critical decisions. I think he's learning now.

The Dems like to discuss and find the best route, sometimes to a
fault. We don't automatically default to whatever benefits the rich
and global corporatists.

The Dems do like to discuss issues, they then like to pat themselves on
the back for discussing the issue. The Dems do not like to take action
because taking action implies accountability. Notice that Obama showed
up to his recitation of talking points without the promised plan.

Last night was a political rally. Everyone with a three digit IQ knows
it.

Lacking consciousness and any obligation to fellow men offers a big
advantage to Republicans.

What does ethics say about kicking a man down and then blaming someone
else for his position.

On 09/09/2011 5:12 PM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:29:31 -0400, wrote:

On 9/9/2011 7:46 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:58:55 -0700, JR North
wrote:

Sooooory O' grinning idiot One;
we needed 'IT' 3 years ago, not now, when you suddenly realize you
might not get re-elected.
JR
HOME PAGE:
http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
--------------------------------------------------

You try working with obstructionist assholes as your supposed partners
and see how much you can get done.

My guess is that any reasonable person might have shot a few of them
by now or at least found a way to have them dropped in the ocean,
accidently.

Obama had a majority of D's in the House and Senate for two years. Why
didn't he take advantage of it?

He hadn't learned at that point that he wasn't supposed to write all the
laws and make all the critical decisions. I think he's learning now.

The Dems like to discuss and find the best route, sometimes to a
fault. We don't automatically default to whatever benefits the rich
and global corporatists.

Lacking consciousness and any obligation to fellow men offers a big
advantage to Republicans.

But racking up debt to your grand kids the democrat way is devine?

See my tag line. Quite digging holes for your kids like a selfish
******* leftie fleabagger.

--
First rule of holes: If your in one, don't keep digging.
So in the hole, why do we insanely want more debt?

On 9/9/2011 7:12 PM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:29:31 -0400, wrote:

On 9/9/2011 7:46 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:58:55 -0700, JR North
wrote:

Sooooory O' grinning idiot One;
we needed 'IT' 3 years ago, not now, when you suddenly realize you
might not get re-elected.
JR
HOME PAGE:
http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
--------------------------------------------------

You try working with obstructionist assholes as your supposed partners
and see how much you can get done.

My guess is that any reasonable person might have shot a few of them
by now or at least found a way to have them dropped in the ocean,
accidently.

Obama had a majority of D's in the House and Senate for two years. Why
didn't he take advantage of it?

He hadn't learned at that point that he wasn't supposed to write all the
laws and make all the critical decisions. I think he's learning now.

The Dems like to discuss and find the best route, sometimes to a
fault. We don't automatically default to whatever benefits the rich
and global corporatists.

Lacking consciousness and any obligation to fellow men offers a big
advantage to Republicans.

Oh no! Another nothing but blue skies over Obama, dummy.

On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:13:16 -0400, Drifter wrote:

On 9/9/2011 7:12 PM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:29:31 -0400, wrote:

On 9/9/2011 7:46 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:58:55 -0700, JR North
wrote:

Sooooory O' grinning idiot One;
we needed 'IT' 3 years ago, not now, when you suddenly realize you
might not get re-elected.
JR
HOME PAGE:
http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
--------------------------------------------------

You try working with obstructionist assholes as your supposed partners
and see how much you can get done.

My guess is that any reasonable person might have shot a few of them
by now or at least found a way to have them dropped in the ocean,
accidently.

Obama had a majority of D's in the House and Senate for two years. Why
didn't he take advantage of it?

He hadn't learned at that point that he wasn't supposed to write all the
laws and make all the critical decisions. I think he's learning now.

The Dems like to discuss and find the best route, sometimes to a
fault. We don't automatically default to whatever benefits the rich
and global corporatists.

Lacking consciousness and any obligation to fellow men offers a big
advantage to Republicans.

Oh no! Another nothing but blue skies over Obama, dummy.

Ha ha ha. You think any one of those buffoons we witnessed the other
night are going to unseat Obama?

Think again.