In article ,
says...

On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:29:31 -0400, Drifter wrote:

On 9/9/2011 7:46 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:58:55 -0700, JR North
wrote:

Sooooory O' grinning idiot One;
we needed 'IT' 3 years ago, not now, when you suddenly realize you
might not get re-elected.
JR
HOME PAGE:
http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
--------------------------------------------------

You try working with obstructionist assholes as your supposed partners
and see how much you can get done.

My guess is that any reasonable person might have shot a few of them
by now or at least found a way to have them dropped in the ocean,
accidently.

Obama had a majority of D's in the House and Senate for two years. Why
didn't he take advantage of it?

He hadn't learned at that point that he wasn't supposed to write all the
laws and make all the critical decisions. I think he's learning now.

The Dems like to discuss and find the best route, sometimes to a
fault. We don't automatically default to whatever benefits the rich
and global corporatists.

The Dems do like to discuss issues, they then like to pat themselves on
the back for discussing the issue. The Dems do not like to take action
because taking action implies accountability. Notice that Obama showed
up to his recitation of talking points without the promised plan.

Last night was a political rally. Everyone with a three digit IQ knows
it.

Lacking consciousness and any obligation to fellow men offers a big
advantage to Republicans.

What does ethics say about kicking a man down and then blaming someone
else for his position.