On 09/09/2011 8:03 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 9/9/2011 9:29 AM, Drifter wrote:
On 9/9/2011 7:46 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:58:55 -0700, JR North
wrote:

Sooooory O' grinning idiot One;
we needed 'IT' 3 years ago, not now, when you suddenly realize you
might not get re-elected.
JR
HOME PAGE:
http://www.seanet.com/~jasonrnorth
--------------------------------------------------

You try working with obstructionist assholes as your supposed partners
and see how much you can get done.

My guess is that any reasonable person might have shot a few of them
by now or at least found a way to have them dropped in the ocean,
accidently.

Obama had a majority of D's in the House and Senate for two years. Why
didn't he take advantage of it?

He hadn't learned at that point that he wasn't supposed to write all the
laws and make all the critical decisions. I think he's learning now.

To even address the "obstructionist" charade is ridiculous. Each and
every person here knows Obama came in screaming "elections have
consequences" and since then has shut out republicans, and dismissed any
input or plans they have for purely political reasons...

Yep, you can have democracy as long as I get more unrestricted debt-spend.
--
First rule of holes: If your in one, don't keep digging.
So in the hole, why do we insanely want more debt?