On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:38:20 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:57:55 -0700, wrote:

On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:57:14 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:41:37 -0700, wrote:

http://www.truth-out.org/three-chart...law/1314626142

Federal spending dramatically increased under former president, George
W. Bush and it has not increased much under President Obama.


How about this graphic from MSNBC

http://gfretwell.com/ftp/msnbc%20on%20jobs.jpg

Nice. I like it.

Clinton more than Reagan.. same number of years in office, including
an impeachment.

Bush (I and II) a whopping 3M each in the same time period.

Obama neg. for 1/2 of one term.


It sure demonstrates your chart is bull****.

How is that? It shows that more jobs were created during Clinton's
presidency than Reagan and both Bush's combined. It also shows how
damaging Bush II was to the economy. Digging into the numbers reveals
that we could have been much worse off (Obama's "job" numbers) if we
hadn't done TARP (starting under Bush) and the Stim.

So, basically, they're two different things, and neither is
"bull****."