Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#52
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/6/11 12:10 PM, BeachBum wrote:
On 9/6/2011 11:26 AM, Your Name Here wrote: On 9/6/11 10:22 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 9/6/11 10:18 AM, wrote: My son in law is in law school too. He said he is tired of being poor, trying to save the environment and he is switching sides. As they say about lawyers. "you can do good or you can do well, pick one" That's too bad. He was probably bright enough to do something useful. http://ncsss.cua.edu/degree-field/phd/2011grads.cfm Harry, tell us about your beautiful young bride. Not a pleasant looking face in the bunch. I counted 4 chins on the red head with the fake smile. Yup, I guess Harry figures that was the best he had ever had, so she must be beautiful. Damn Dr. Karen Grear is a dog. I wonder when she is going to finish the rest of her Dr. Dr. degrees. |
#53
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/6/2011 3:41 PM, Your Name Here wrote:
On 9/6/11 12:10 PM, BeachBum wrote: On 9/6/2011 11:26 AM, Your Name Here wrote: On 9/6/11 10:22 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 9/6/11 10:18 AM, wrote: My son in law is in law school too. He said he is tired of being poor, trying to save the environment and he is switching sides. As they say about lawyers. "you can do good or you can do well, pick one" That's too bad. He was probably bright enough to do something useful. http://ncsss.cua.edu/degree-field/phd/2011grads.cfm Harry, tell us about your beautiful young bride. Not a pleasant looking face in the bunch. I counted 4 chins on the red head with the fake smile. Yup, I guess Harry figures that was the best he had ever had, so she must be beautiful. Damn Dr. Karen Grear is a dog. I wonder when she is going to finish the rest of her Dr. Dr. degrees. A little harsh on the old gal, aren't you? |
#54
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/6/2011 3:29 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:41:26 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:09:43 -0700, wrote: On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:20:26 -0400, wrote: I believe we exported something on the order of $1.5T last year or the year before. As usual, you're just paranoid. ... and we imported $2.5T More like $2T, but in any case, it doesn't "far exceed" exports. Try again. It depends on what period we are talking about doesn't it. I was trying to find one that matched your $1.5T No it doesn't. See my other post if you "****ing" don't mind. Yknow dummy. if you keep tipping your hand to Greg, He's just going to drive the knife deeper and twist it. |
#55
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/6/11 4:01 PM, BeachBum wrote:
On 9/6/2011 3:29 PM, wrote: On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:41:26 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:09:43 -0700, wrote: On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:20:26 -0400, wrote: I believe we exported something on the order of $1.5T last year or the year before. As usual, you're just paranoid. ... and we imported $2.5T More like $2T, but in any case, it doesn't "far exceed" exports. Try again. It depends on what period we are talking about doesn't it. I was trying to find one that matched your $1.5T No it doesn't. See my other post if you "****ing" don't mind. Yknow dummy. if you keep tipping your hand to Greg, He's just going to drive the knife deeper and twist it. Did you even graduate from high school, jimbobboy? -- I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the powerful. |
#56
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/6/11 3:57 PM, BeachBum wrote:
On 9/6/2011 3:41 PM, Your Name Here wrote: On 9/6/11 12:10 PM, BeachBum wrote: On 9/6/2011 11:26 AM, Your Name Here wrote: On 9/6/11 10:22 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 9/6/11 10:18 AM, wrote: My son in law is in law school too. He said he is tired of being poor, trying to save the environment and he is switching sides. As they say about lawyers. "you can do good or you can do well, pick one" That's too bad. He was probably bright enough to do something useful. http://ncsss.cua.edu/degree-field/phd/2011grads.cfm Harry, tell us about your beautiful young bride. Not a pleasant looking face in the bunch. I counted 4 chins on the red head with the fake smile. Yup, I guess Harry figures that was the best he had ever had, so she must be beautiful. Damn Dr. Karen Grear is a dog. I wonder when she is going to finish the rest of her Dr. Dr. degrees. A little harsh on the old gal, aren't you? Well, we have been told for many years about his young beautiful bride, we it is hard to believe, but he lied about that also. |
#57
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:02:22 -0400, X ` Man
wrote: On 9/6/11 4:01 PM, BeachBum wrote: On 9/6/2011 3:29 PM, wrote: On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:41:26 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:09:43 -0700, wrote: On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:20:26 -0400, wrote: I believe we exported something on the order of $1.5T last year or the year before. As usual, you're just paranoid. ... and we imported $2.5T More like $2T, but in any case, it doesn't "far exceed" exports. Try again. It depends on what period we are talking about doesn't it. I was trying to find one that matched your $1.5T No it doesn't. See my other post if you "****ing" don't mind. Yknow dummy. if you keep tipping your hand to Greg, He's just going to drive the knife deeper and twist it. Did you even graduate from high school, jimbobboy? It's all about violence for the crazies on the right. Against women, against children, against people of color, against anyone who doesn't believe exactly what they believe. |
#58
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/09/2011 1:28 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:39:27 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:08:34 -0700, wrote: The fact remains our exports are far exceeded by our imports. Until we start repatriating more of our dollars, we are just moving the deck chairs around on the Titanic. As usual, you can't even support your own arguments. Our exports exceed our imports? Actually, it's the reverse, but it's not "far exceeded". It's about $1.3T export to about $2T import. Read what I wrote again "The fact remains our exports are far exceeded by our imports." It is easy to say I am wrong if you can't ****ing read. Using your numbers ($700B more in imports) I think 153% is "far exceeded". My apologies. I'm just used to you muddling the facts when you try to make your "****ing" arguments. Thanks for being civil. As I said, there an imbalance, but it's not out of line historically, as per 2002. http://www.marktaw.com/culture_and_m...deDeficit.html Try again. Good charts, but unfortunately you don't know how to read them. Fact is no one wants US **** unless it is much cheaper. Your economy is massively over priced and over valued by at least 300%. What that means for you is USA is going to have a depreciating economy with 300% inflation for at least the foreseeable future. Which will put China as the economic #1 super power. Make it cheaper, better and faster, or go out of business. Union and entitlement rant or not isn't going to supersede the facts. USA no longer has the edge in the world economy. If your digging a ditch in Nairobi, or Afghanistan to Jakarta, why buy over prices often inferior American? USA has lost its edge, and mortgaging the nation to debt slavery to keep up appearances. Zimbabwe tried it, so did Argentina, Iceland, Greece..... But sooner or later the bull**** will fail. -- First rule of holes: If your in one, don't keep digging. So in the hole, why do we insanely want more debt? |
#59
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:20:54 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 06/09/2011 1:28 PM, wrote: On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:39:27 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:08:34 -0700, wrote: The fact remains our exports are far exceeded by our imports. Until we start repatriating more of our dollars, we are just moving the deck chairs around on the Titanic. As usual, you can't even support your own arguments. Our exports exceed our imports? Actually, it's the reverse, but it's not "far exceeded". It's about $1.3T export to about $2T import. Read what I wrote again "The fact remains our exports are far exceeded by our imports." It is easy to say I am wrong if you can't ****ing read. Using your numbers ($700B more in imports) I think 153% is "far exceeded". My apologies. I'm just used to you muddling the facts when you try to make your "****ing" arguments. Thanks for being civil. As I said, there an imbalance, but it's not out of line historically, as per 2002. http://www.marktaw.com/culture_and_m...deDeficit.html Try again. Good charts, but unfortunately you don't know how to read them. Fact is no one wants US **** unless it is much cheaper. Your economy is massively over priced and over valued by at least 300%. What that means for you is USA is going to have a depreciating economy with 300% inflation for at least the foreseeable future. Which will put China as the economic #1 super power. Make it cheaper, better and faster, or go out of business. Union and entitlement rant or not isn't going to supersede the facts. USA no longer has the edge in the world economy. If your digging a ditch in Nairobi, or Afghanistan to Jakarta, why buy over prices often inferior American? USA has lost its edge, and mortgaging the nation to debt slavery to keep up appearances. Zimbabwe tried it, so did Argentina, Iceland, Greece..... But sooner or later the bull**** will fail. They are great charts... to bad you're too stupid to figure out what they're saying. |
#60
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/09/2011 5:29 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:20:54 -0600, wrote: On 06/09/2011 1:28 PM, wrote: On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:39:27 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:08:34 -0700, wrote: The fact remains our exports are far exceeded by our imports. Until we start repatriating more of our dollars, we are just moving the deck chairs around on the Titanic. As usual, you can't even support your own arguments. Our exports exceed our imports? Actually, it's the reverse, but it's not "far exceeded". It's about $1.3T export to about $2T import. Read what I wrote again "The fact remains our exports are far exceeded by our imports." It is easy to say I am wrong if you can't ****ing read. Using your numbers ($700B more in imports) I think 153% is "far exceeded". My apologies. I'm just used to you muddling the facts when you try to make your "****ing" arguments. Thanks for being civil. As I said, there an imbalance, but it's not out of line historically, as per 2002. http://www.marktaw.com/culture_and_m...deDeficit.html Try again. Good charts, but unfortunately you don't know how to read them. Fact is no one wants US **** unless it is much cheaper. Your economy is massively over priced and over valued by at least 300%. What that means for you is USA is going to have a depreciating economy with 300% inflation for at least the foreseeable future. Which will put China as the economic #1 super power. Make it cheaper, better and faster, or go out of business. Union and entitlement rant or not isn't going to supersede the facts. USA no longer has the edge in the world economy. If your digging a ditch in Nairobi, or Afghanistan to Jakarta, why buy over prices often inferior American? USA has lost its edge, and mortgaging the nation to debt slavery to keep up appearances. Zimbabwe tried it, so did Argentina, Iceland, Greece..... But sooner or later the bull**** will fail. They are great charts... to bad you're too stupid to figure out what they're saying. Numb-de-plum Polly want a cracker? -- First rule of holes: If your in one, don't keep digging. So in the hole, why do we insanely want more debt? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crazy people | General | |||
Crazy Mice...! | General | |||
Crazy Mice...! | General | |||
Those crazy Germans | ASA | |||
I have a crazy wife | General |