On 9/6/2011 8:53 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:24:44 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 16:46:40 -0400, John
wrote:

On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 09:06:20 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 12:58:59 -0600,
wrote:

On 03/09/2011 11:41 AM, wrote:
http://www.truth-out.org/three-chart...law/1314626142

Federal spending dramatically increased under former president, George
W. Bush and it has not increased much under President Obama.

Look closer at the chart fleabagger. It was 2007 once the democrat 2006
congress debt lovers and Bernanke money print took right off. Also
right about the time unemployment rose with government debt and
overspending. DC has been running on bull**** and fraud ever since.
And Obama shovels more debt and bull**** than all before him.

Fact is ass holes like you vote for fleabaggers that has ruined the USA.

Did Bush have a veto?

Over continuing resolutions?

Which ones?

Any.
John, play fair. How can she make an argument out of that?

On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 08:53:49 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:24:44 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 16:46:40 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 09:06:20 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 12:58:59 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 03/09/2011 11:41 AM, wrote:
http://www.truth-out.org/three-chart...law/1314626142

Federal spending dramatically increased under former president, George
W. Bush and it has not increased much under President Obama.

Look closer at the chart fleabagger. It was 2007 once the democrat 2006
congress debt lovers and Bernanke money print took right off. Also
right about the time unemployment rose with government debt and
overspending. DC has been running on bull**** and fraud ever since.
And Obama shovels more debt and bull**** than all before him.

Fact is ass holes like you vote for fleabaggers that has ruined the USA.

Did Bush have a veto?

Over continuing resolutions?

Which ones?

Any.

Your hero Bush! He screwed up the economy, but that's ok with you.
He's white.

On 9/7/2011 12:57 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:41:37 -0700, wrote:

http://www.truth-out.org/three-chart...law/1314626142

Federal spending dramatically increased under former president, George
W. Bush and it has not increased much under President Obama.


How about this graphic from MSNBC

http://gfretwell.com/ftp/msnbc%20on%20jobs.jpg

No wonder his photo looks like he just ate a sour pickle.

On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:57:14 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:41:37 -0700, wrote:

http://www.truth-out.org/three-chart...law/1314626142

Federal spending dramatically increased under former president, George
W. Bush and it has not increased much under President Obama.


How about this graphic from MSNBC

http://gfretwell.com/ftp/msnbc%20on%20jobs.jpg

Nice. I like it.

Clinton more than Reagan.. same number of years in office, including
an impeachment.

Bush (I and II) a whopping 3M each in the same time period.

Obama neg. for 1/2 of one term.

On 9/7/2011 1:57 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:57:14 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:41:37 -0700, wrote:

http://www.truth-out.org/three-chart...law/1314626142

Federal spending dramatically increased under former president, George
W. Bush and it has not increased much under President Obama.


How about this graphic from MSNBC

http://gfretwell.com/ftp/msnbc%20on%20jobs.jpg

Nice. I like it.

Clinton more than Reagan.. same number of years in office, including
an impeachment.

Bush (I and II) a whopping 3M each in the same time period.

Obama neg. for 1/2 of one term.

DePlume Pats O on the back for killing jobs. She is a strange duck.

On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:38:20 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:57:55 -0700, wrote:

On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:57:14 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:41:37 -0700, wrote:

http://www.truth-out.org/three-chart...law/1314626142

Federal spending dramatically increased under former president, George
W. Bush and it has not increased much under President Obama.


How about this graphic from MSNBC

http://gfretwell.com/ftp/msnbc%20on%20jobs.jpg

Nice. I like it.

Clinton more than Reagan.. same number of years in office, including
an impeachment.

Bush (I and II) a whopping 3M each in the same time period.

Obama neg. for 1/2 of one term.


It sure demonstrates your chart is bull****.

How is that? It shows that more jobs were created during Clinton's
presidency than Reagan and both Bush's combined. It also shows how
damaging Bush II was to the economy. Digging into the numbers reveals
that we could have been much worse off (Obama's "job" numbers) if we
hadn't done TARP (starting under Bush) and the Stim.

So, basically, they're two different things, and neither is
"bull****."

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:18:02 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:44:48 -0700, wrote:

On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:38:20 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:57:55 -0700, wrote:

On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:57:14 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:41:37 -0700, wrote:

http://www.truth-out.org/three-chart...law/1314626142

Federal spending dramatically increased under former president, George
W. Bush and it has not increased much under President Obama.


How about this graphic from MSNBC

http://gfretwell.com/ftp/msnbc%20on%20jobs.jpg

Nice. I like it.

Clinton more than Reagan.. same number of years in office, including
an impeachment.

Bush (I and II) a whopping 3M each in the same time period.

Obama neg. for 1/2 of one term.


It sure demonstrates your chart is bull****.

How is that? It shows that more jobs were created during Clinton's
presidency than Reagan and both Bush's combined. It also shows how
damaging Bush II was to the economy. Digging into the numbers reveals
that we could have been much worse off (Obama's "job" numbers) if we
hadn't done TARP (starting under Bush) and the Stim.

So, basically, they're two different things, and neither is
"bull****."

You were trying to show the great success of Obama's "recovery" and
the abject failure of Bush but Bush netted 3 million jobs created and
Obama lost 3 million. Clinton and Reagan were not on that chart

http://www.flickr.com/photos/davecjohnson/6088811219/

No, I wasn't. I was showing the facts. Are you going to claim that the
job growth listed is untrue? If so, show some facts. Feel free to
continue to defend the worst president in history.

Here are some other facts:

He got the memo about bin laden's plan, and his only comment was "now
you've covered your ass." He was frozen like a deer in the headlights
when he learned about the attacks, and he couldn't even figure out
that maybe it was time to figure out what exactly was going on. He
attacked a country under false pretenses, approved torture, and told
everyone to go shopping. He was away from the White House 1/3 of both
terms in office. He ruined the US economy, and damaged our standing in
the world.

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:29:14 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:26:44 -0700, wrote:


You were trying to show the great success of Obama's "recovery" and
the abject failure of Bush but Bush netted 3 million jobs created and
Obama lost 3 million. Clinton and Reagan were not on that chart

http://www.flickr.com/photos/davecjohnson/6088811219/

No, I wasn't. I was showing the facts. Are you going to claim that the
job growth listed is untrue?


MINUS 2.9 million jobs.
You really have to cherry pick the data to come up with a chart that
shows job growth. Growth compared to what?

As I said, up until the chart ends, those are the facts.

Here are some more for you.

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa...67&emailView=1