On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:41:10 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Aug 26, 1:11*pm, iBoatMore wrote:
In article ,
says...





On 8/26/11 11:38 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:09:06 -0400, X ~ *wrote:

In ,
says...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57653052047122...

This **** is getting old.

Do you think we should be able to rape the environment and pollute at
will?

This is rhetorical question, right?

Not in the Perry campaign, which would word it:

Shouldn't we be able to rape the environment and pollute at will?

Sure, Kevin.

What carbon footprint did the agents raiding Gibson produce? Was the
actual environmental effect considerably worse than anything Gibson
may have done? The answer is obviously "Yes".

Which obviously isn't the point, since it wasn't Gibson that was
directly causing the problem.