In article ,
says...

On 8/26/11 11:38 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:09:06 -0400, X ~ wrote:

In ,
says...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...471223268.html

This **** is getting old.

Do you think we should be able to rape the environment and pollute at
will?

This is rhetorical question, right?


Not in the Perry campaign, which would word it:

Shouldn't we be able to rape the environment and pollute at will?

Sure, Kevin.

On Aug 26, 1:11*pm, iBoatMore wrote:
In article ,
says...





On 8/26/11 11:38 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:09:06 -0400, X ~ *wrote:

In ,
says...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57653052047122...

This **** is getting old.

Do you think we should be able to rape the environment and pollute at
will?

This is rhetorical question, right?

Not in the Perry campaign, which would word it:

Shouldn't we be able to rape the environment and pollute at will?

Sure, Kevin.

What carbon footprint did the agents raiding Gibson produce? Was the
actual environmental effect considerably worse than anything Gibson
may have done? The answer is obviously "Yes".

In article 095eac6b-2fe5-4607-8152-
,
says...

On Aug 26, 1:11*pm, iBoatMore wrote:
In article ,
says...





On 8/26/11 11:38 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:09:06 -0400, X ~ *wrote:

In ,
says...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57653052047122...

This **** is getting old.

Do you think we should be able to rape the environment and pollute at
will?

This is rhetorical question, right?

Not in the Perry campaign, which would word it:

Shouldn't we be able to rape the environment and pollute at will?

Sure, Kevin.

What carbon footprint did the agents raiding Gibson produce? Was the
actual environmental effect considerably worse than anything Gibson
may have done? The answer is obviously "Yes".

Horse****.

On Aug 26, 2:08*pm, iBoatMore wrote:
In article 095eac6b-2fe5-4607-8152-
,
says...





On Aug 26, 1:11*pm, iBoatMore wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 8/26/11 11:38 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:09:06 -0400, X ~ *wrote:

In ,
says...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57653052047122...

This **** is getting old.

Do you think we should be able to rape the environment and pollute at
will?

This is rhetorical question, right?

Not in the Perry campaign, which would word it:

Shouldn't we be able to rape the environment and pollute at will?

Sure, Kevin.

What carbon footprint did the agents raiding Gibson produce? *Was the
actual environmental effect considerably worse than anything Gibson
may have done? *The answer is obviously "Yes".

Horse****.

This is the same sort of governmental insanity that is causing kids
lemonaide stands to be shut down:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain...monade-stands/
It is very clear that govt is waaaaaaaay overfunded if they have time
to worry about such things. The solution is lower taxes. If you vote
for higher taxes, they will not be used to solve problems but will be
used to CAUSE problems like this.

On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:29:58 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

It is very clear that govt is waaaaaaaay overfunded if they have time
to worry about such things. The solution is lower taxes. If you vote
for higher taxes, they will not be used to solve problems but will be
used to CAUSE problems like this.

==================

And that's a fact. No one derives any benefit whatsoever from this
kind of governmental stupidity, and we as taxpayers get to pay the
bill for it.

Anyone involved with that raid should be fired.

On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:52:20 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:29:58 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

It is very clear that govt is waaaaaaaay overfunded if they have time
to worry about such things. The solution is lower taxes. If you vote
for higher taxes, they will not be used to solve problems but will be
used to CAUSE problems like this.

==================

And that's a fact. No one derives any benefit whatsoever from this
kind of governmental stupidity, and we as taxpayers get to pay the
bill for it.

Anyone involved with that raid should be fired.

So much for your bull**** about not responding to political,
non-boating posts. In any case, if you and Frogbreath have a problem
with local police enforcement, I'm sure you can find a way to blame
Obama or Bernanke.

On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:52:20 -0400, Wayne B wrote:

On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:29:58 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

It is very clear that govt is waaaaaaaay overfunded if they have time
to worry about such things. The solution is lower taxes. If you vote
for higher taxes, they will not be used to solve problems but will be
used to CAUSE problems like this.

==================

And that's a fact. No one derives any benefit whatsoever from this
kind of governmental stupidity, and we as taxpayers get to pay the
bill for it.

Anyone involved with that raid should be fired.

Hey Turkey! Lead by example!

"Wayne B" wrote in message
...


Hey, there you are. Didn't see any other posts from you and was thinking
about your voyage south.
Hope you found a safe harbor and a strong mooring.

Rock and roll. Kinda miss it.

Eisboch

In article 99187cd7-1cb3-4f84-b6d1-99755a1aa8d7
@n35g2000yqf.googlegroups.com, says...

On Aug 26, 2:08*pm, iBoatMore wrote:
In article 095eac6b-2fe5-4607-8152-
,
says...





On Aug 26, 1:11*pm, iBoatMore wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 8/26/11 11:38 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:09:06 -0400, X ~ *wrote:

In ,
says...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57653052047122...

This **** is getting old.

Do you think we should be able to rape the environment and pollute at
will?

This is rhetorical question, right?

Not in the Perry campaign, which would word it:

Shouldn't we be able to rape the environment and pollute at will?

Sure, Kevin.

What carbon footprint did the agents raiding Gibson produce? *Was the
actual environmental effect considerably worse than anything Gibson
may have done? *The answer is obviously "Yes".

Horse****.

This is the same sort of governmental insanity that is causing kids
lemonaide stands to be shut down:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain...monade-stands/
It is very clear that govt is waaaaaaaay overfunded if they have time
to worry about such things. The solution is lower taxes. If you vote
for higher taxes, they will not be used to solve problems but will be
used to CAUSE problems like this.

One has absolutely NOTHING to do with the other. Granted, government has
run amok. But, in the case of decimation of the rain forests, the
government is right.

On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 08:36:13 -0400, iBoatMore wrote:

In article 99187cd7-1cb3-4f84-b6d1-99755a1aa8d7
, says...

On Aug 26, 2:08*pm, iBoatMore wrote:
In article 095eac6b-2fe5-4607-8152-
,
says...





On Aug 26, 1:11*pm, iBoatMore wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 8/26/11 11:38 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:09:06 -0400, X ~ *wrote:

In ,
says...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57653052047122...

This **** is getting old.

Do you think we should be able to rape the environment and pollute at
will?

This is rhetorical question, right?

Not in the Perry campaign, which would word it:

Shouldn't we be able to rape the environment and pollute at will?

Sure, Kevin.

What carbon footprint did the agents raiding Gibson produce? *Was the
actual environmental effect considerably worse than anything Gibson
may have done? *The answer is obviously "Yes".

Horse****.

This is the same sort of governmental insanity that is causing kids
lemonaide stands to be shut down:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain...monade-stands/
It is very clear that govt is waaaaaaaay overfunded if they have time
to worry about such things. The solution is lower taxes. If you vote
for higher taxes, they will not be used to solve problems but will be
used to CAUSE problems like this.

One has absolutely NOTHING to do with the other. Granted, government has
run amok. But, in the case of decimation of the rain forests, the
government is right.

You have some proof, Kevin, that Gibson is causing the 'decimation of the rain forests'?