Living longer? Not in US
 

On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 05:27:38 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote:

Wayne. Please stop calling Deplume 'D'Parrot'. Yes, I know, she
strongly resembles, with her behavior, a dimwitted African grey. But,
that is no excuse to participate in name-calling.

(There, deplume, does that make you happy?)

===========

You're right John. I defer to your higher sense of right and wrong,
not to mention moral indignation..

Calling Ms. D'Plume a parrot could easily be misconstrued as an insult
to perfectlly good parrots everywhere, sort of like parrot profiling
or stereotyping.

My bad.

Living longer? Not in US
 

On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 05:27:38 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote:

On Jul 2, 9:37*am, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 04:07:00 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog









wrote:
On Jul 2, 1:31*am, wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:35 -0400, Wayne B

wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:12 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

No one doubts we have some of the most advanced medical technologies,
research, and facilities. But if you measure systems by life expectancy,
the United States, at 37th in the world for both men and women, is not
even close to having the best.

If you leave out the 20 to 30% of the US population with unhealthy
lifestyles (drugs, alcohol, violence, etc.), the numbers look quite
different. *Yes I know, it's really not fair to leave out all of those
democrats, but it is what it is.

So, if someone lives in a bad neighborhood, is a law-abiding citizen,
but is a victim of gun violence, it's that's person's fault? Or, if
all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly
stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying.

No D'Plume. It is all YOUR fault. YOUR fault for allowing the armed
person to prey on the law-abiding citizen due to economic strife or
what ever else you can blame on society to put the person into a
league of criminal activity due to desperate circumstances.

It is also YOUR fault that people can't control their poor eating
habits due to you not setting up education and health food services
for them. Not counting inviting them into your home and cooking for
them.

Poor D'Plume. You are a toad in society. You are not, and will not do
enough for the poor, helpless, and needy..

Trying to engage Ms. D'Parrot in an intelligent and reasoned debate is
an excercise in futility. *Her mind is firmly made up and is not about
to be easily confused by the facts. * That said, store owners in poor
neighborhoods, like store owners everywhere, know their customers and
stock what sells. *If people are buying vegetables and dairy products,
they'll stock vegetables and dairy products. *If people are buying
Hostess Twinkies and malt liquor, they'll stock that instead. *It is a
tribute to our wonderfully enlightened policies that people can
actually use government food stamps to buy junk food, and it sells
very well.

Wayne. Please stop calling Deplume 'D'Parrot'. Yes, I know, she
strongly resembles, with her behavior, a dimwitted African grey. But,
that is no excuse to participate in name-calling.

(There, deplume, does that make you happy?)

Well, there we are. Proof positive that you're a hypocritical liar.
You've proved your a racist in other posts, but I was wondering how
long it would take to demonstrate your low-brow lying. You're really
working hard to move to the top of the idiot list, but Knuckles is
still king of the hill.

Living longer? Not in US
 

On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 11:42:55 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 05:27:38 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote:

Wayne. Please stop calling Deplume 'D'Parrot'. Yes, I know, she
strongly resembles, with her behavior, a dimwitted African grey. But,
that is no excuse to participate in name-calling.

(There, deplume, does that make you happy?)

===========

You're right John. I defer to your higher sense of right and wrong,
not to mention moral indignation..

Calling Ms. D'Plume a parrot could easily be misconstrued as an insult
to perfectlly good parrots everywhere, sort of like parrot profiling
or stereotyping.

My bad.

Yes Wayne, you're the little ****head I always suspected you were.

Living longer? Not in US
 

On 03/07/2011 5:51 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Jul 2, 12:00 pm, wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:37:14 -0400, Wayne B









wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 04:07:00 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog
wrote:

On Jul 2, 1:31 am, wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:35 -0400, Wayne B

wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:12 -0400,
wrote:

No one doubts we have some of the most advanced medical technologies,
research, and facilities. But if you measure systems by life expectancy,
the United States, at 37th in the world for both men and women, is not
even close to having the best.

If you leave out the 20 to 30% of the US population with unhealthy
lifestyles (drugs, alcohol, violence, etc.), the numbers look quite
different. Yes I know, it's really not fair to leave out all of those
democrats, but it is what it is.

So, if someone lives in a bad neighborhood, is a law-abiding citizen,
but is a victim of gun violence, it's that's person's fault? Or, if
all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly
stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying.

No D'Plume. It is all YOUR fault. YOUR fault for allowing the armed
person to prey on the law-abiding citizen due to economic strife or
what ever else you can blame on society to put the person into a
league of criminal activity due to desperate circumstances.

It is also YOUR fault that people can't control their poor eating
habits due to you not setting up education and health food services
for them. Not counting inviting them into your home and cooking for
them.

Poor D'Plume. You are a toad in society. You are not, and will not do
enough for the poor, helpless, and needy..

Trying to engage Ms. D'Parrot in an intelligent and reasoned debate is
an excercise in futility. Her mind is firmly made up and is not about
to be easily confused by the facts. That said, store owners in poor
neighborhoods, like store owners everywhere, know their customers and
stock what sells. If people are buying vegetables and dairy products,
they'll stock vegetables and dairy products. If people are buying
Hostess Twinkies and malt liquor, they'll stock that instead. It is a
tribute to our wonderfully enlightened policies that people can
actually use government food stamps to buy junk food, and it sells
very well.

So, basically you agree with your right-wing buddy's racist nonsense.
We get it Wayne. Now all we have to do is wait for John to tell you to
stop. I have a feeling it'll be a long wait, since he's a known liar.

There was absolutely nothing racially driven in his posting D'Plume. I
believe it is true that you are making things up as you go.

defumer, wtf3 and harryk, they always make up their bull**** as they go
on. Three pathetic bull****ers.

Now for the racist one liner snipes from the chicken ****s will follow.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.
------
In Debt We Trust!
-- Obama and the democrats, world record in debt incursion.

Living longer? Not in US
 

On 02/07/2011 6:53 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:24:35 -0600,
wrote:

On 02/07/2011 5:40 PM, Harryk wrote:
On 7/2/11 6:26 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 02/07/2011 2:56 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 13:05:50 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Jul 2, 2:25 pm, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 11:54:42 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Jul 2, 8:37 am, Wayne wrote:

That said, store owners in poor
neighborhoods, like store owners everywhere, know their customers
and
stock what sells. If people are buying vegetables and dairy
products,
they'll stock vegetables and dairy products. If people are buying
Hostess Twinkies and malt liquor, they'll stock that instead. It
is a
tribute to our wonderfully enlightened policies that people can
actually use government food stamps to buy junk food, and it sells
very well.

That's pretty well how it works in my area too. just go through any
convenience store. Pizza, beer and chips is the fare of the day.

And you know this because you live in the inner city? Doubtful.

I guess the NY Times is, as usual, just wrong, because it's not a
right-wing publication?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/04/he...on/04well.html

I live in a small town surrounded by small towns.It doesn't matter
what the NY Times has to say.But if you think it's "just wrong, as
usual* I won't be the judge. I don't live in the 'inner city' and
I'll repeat what i said:

"That's pretty well how it works in my area too. just go through any
convenience store. Pizza, beer and chips is the fare of the day. "

I have no doubt that a small town is as you describe, but this doesn't
say anything regarding the overall problem of poor nutrition for those
who are struggling.

The "convenience" store model is for, well, convenience. It's never
going to be for healthy food.

Get a job.


Interesting that no matter how complex a problem might be, you've got a
probably unworkable, simple-minded solution.

Simple solutions often work best. You whiners need to get a job. That
simple.

Typical right-wing nut. Complex problems somehow equates to simple
solutions. Yes, you're a simpleton.

So are you frightened of work?

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.
------
In Debt We Trust!
-- Obama and the democrats, world record in debt incursion.

Living longer? Not in US
 

On 02/07/2011 6:52 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:26:42 -0600,
wrote:

On 02/07/2011 2:56 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 13:05:50 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Jul 2, 2:25 pm, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 11:54:42 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Jul 2, 8:37 am, Wayne wrote:

That said, store owners in poor
neighborhoods, like store owners everywhere, know their customers and
stock what sells. If people are buying vegetables and dairy products,
they'll stock vegetables and dairy products. If people are buying
Hostess Twinkies and malt liquor, they'll stock that instead. It is a
tribute to our wonderfully enlightened policies that people can
actually use government food stamps to buy junk food, and it sells
very well.

That's pretty well how it works in my area too. just go through any
convenience store. Pizza, beer and chips is the fare of the day.

And you know this because you live in the inner city? Doubtful.

I guess the NY Times is, as usual, just wrong, because it's not a
right-wing publication?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/04/he...on/04well.html

I live in a small town surrounded by small towns.It doesn't matter
what the NY Times has to say.But if you think it's "just wrong, as
usual* I won't be the judge. I don't live in the 'inner city' and
I'll repeat what i said:

"That's pretty well how it works in my area too. just go through any
convenience store. Pizza, beer and chips is the fare of the day. "

I have no doubt that a small town is as you describe, but this doesn't
say anything regarding the overall problem of poor nutrition for those
who are struggling.

The "convenience" store model is for, well, convenience. It's never
going to be for healthy food.

Get a job.

Fortunately, I have my own business. You're incapable of getting a
job, however. Have you applied to McD's lately? You never know...

Ya, heard that before. Your a legal assistant, self (un)employed.

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.
------
In Debt We Trust!
-- Obama and the democrats, world record in debt incursion.

Living longer? Not in US
 

On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 11:22:17 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 03/07/2011 5:51 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Jul 2, 12:00 pm, wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:37:14 -0400, Wayne B









wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 04:07:00 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog
wrote:

On Jul 2, 1:31 am, wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:35 -0400, Wayne B

wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:12 -0400,
wrote:

No one doubts we have some of the most advanced medical technologies,
research, and facilities. But if you measure systems by life expectancy,
the United States, at 37th in the world for both men and women, is not
even close to having the best.

If you leave out the 20 to 30% of the US population with unhealthy
lifestyles (drugs, alcohol, violence, etc.), the numbers look quite
different. Yes I know, it's really not fair to leave out all of those
democrats, but it is what it is.

So, if someone lives in a bad neighborhood, is a law-abiding citizen,
but is a victim of gun violence, it's that's person's fault? Or, if
all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly
stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying.

No D'Plume. It is all YOUR fault. YOUR fault for allowing the armed
person to prey on the law-abiding citizen due to economic strife or
what ever else you can blame on society to put the person into a
league of criminal activity due to desperate circumstances.

It is also YOUR fault that people can't control their poor eating
habits due to you not setting up education and health food services
for them. Not counting inviting them into your home and cooking for
them.

Poor D'Plume. You are a toad in society. You are not, and will not do
enough for the poor, helpless, and needy..

Trying to engage Ms. D'Parrot in an intelligent and reasoned debate is
an excercise in futility. Her mind is firmly made up and is not about
to be easily confused by the facts. That said, store owners in poor
neighborhoods, like store owners everywhere, know their customers and
stock what sells. If people are buying vegetables and dairy products,
they'll stock vegetables and dairy products. If people are buying
Hostess Twinkies and malt liquor, they'll stock that instead. It is a
tribute to our wonderfully enlightened policies that people can
actually use government food stamps to buy junk food, and it sells
very well.

So, basically you agree with your right-wing buddy's racist nonsense.
We get it Wayne. Now all we have to do is wait for John to tell you to
stop. I have a feeling it'll be a long wait, since he's a known liar.

There was absolutely nothing racially driven in his posting D'Plume. I
believe it is true that you are making things up as you go.

defumer, wtf3 and harryk, they always make up their bull**** as they go
on. Three pathetic bull****ers.

Now for the racist one liner snipes from the chicken ****s will follow.

Says the liar/racist white trash guy living in a single wide with no
hope of getting a mortgage even if he tried. We know you're unable to
get into this great country, but feel free to continue to claim you
give a crap about us.

Living longer? Not in US
 

On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 11:23:22 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 02/07/2011 6:53 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:24:35 -0600,
wrote:

On 02/07/2011 5:40 PM, Harryk wrote:
On 7/2/11 6:26 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 02/07/2011 2:56 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 13:05:50 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Jul 2, 2:25 pm, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 11:54:42 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Jul 2, 8:37 am, Wayne wrote:

That said, store owners in poor
neighborhoods, like store owners everywhere, know their customers
and
stock what sells. If people are buying vegetables and dairy
products,
they'll stock vegetables and dairy products. If people are buying
Hostess Twinkies and malt liquor, they'll stock that instead. It
is a
tribute to our wonderfully enlightened policies that people can
actually use government food stamps to buy junk food, and it sells
very well.

That's pretty well how it works in my area too. just go through any
convenience store. Pizza, beer and chips is the fare of the day.

And you know this because you live in the inner city? Doubtful.

I guess the NY Times is, as usual, just wrong, because it's not a
right-wing publication?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/04/he...on/04well.html

I live in a small town surrounded by small towns.It doesn't matter
what the NY Times has to say.But if you think it's "just wrong, as
usual* I won't be the judge. I don't live in the 'inner city' and
I'll repeat what i said:

"That's pretty well how it works in my area too. just go through any
convenience store. Pizza, beer and chips is the fare of the day. "

I have no doubt that a small town is as you describe, but this doesn't
say anything regarding the overall problem of poor nutrition for those
who are struggling.

The "convenience" store model is for, well, convenience. It's never
going to be for healthy food.

Get a job.


Interesting that no matter how complex a problem might be, you've got a
probably unworkable, simple-minded solution.

Simple solutions often work best. You whiners need to get a job. That
simple.

Typical right-wing nut. Complex problems somehow equates to simple
solutions. Yes, you're a simpleton.

So are you frightened of work?

You're the one who sits in his single-wide, scratching his butt with
no hope of a job.

Living longer? Not in US
 

On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 11:24:11 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 02/07/2011 6:52 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:26:42 -0600,
wrote:

On 02/07/2011 2:56 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 13:05:50 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Jul 2, 2:25 pm, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 11:54:42 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Jul 2, 8:37 am, Wayne wrote:

That said, store owners in poor
neighborhoods, like store owners everywhere, know their customers and
stock what sells. If people are buying vegetables and dairy products,
they'll stock vegetables and dairy products. If people are buying
Hostess Twinkies and malt liquor, they'll stock that instead. It is a
tribute to our wonderfully enlightened policies that people can
actually use government food stamps to buy junk food, and it sells
very well.

That's pretty well how it works in my area too. just go through any
convenience store. Pizza, beer and chips is the fare of the day.

And you know this because you live in the inner city? Doubtful.

I guess the NY Times is, as usual, just wrong, because it's not a
right-wing publication?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/04/he...on/04well.html

I live in a small town surrounded by small towns.It doesn't matter
what the NY Times has to say.But if you think it's "just wrong, as
usual* I won't be the judge. I don't live in the 'inner city' and
I'll repeat what i said:

"That's pretty well how it works in my area too. just go through any
convenience store. Pizza, beer and chips is the fare of the day. "

I have no doubt that a small town is as you describe, but this doesn't
say anything regarding the overall problem of poor nutrition for those
who are struggling.

The "convenience" store model is for, well, convenience. It's never
going to be for healthy food.

Get a job.

Fortunately, I have my own business. You're incapable of getting a
job, however. Have you applied to McD's lately? You never know...

Ya, heard that before. Your a legal assistant, self (un)employed.

Huh? If you've heard it before, then you would know that I don't
practice patent law much any more... very rarely, and I don't need a
legal assistant to do it. Oh wait, you're a moron and have trouble
with comprehension. My apology.

Living longer? Not in US
 

On Jul 3, 1:17*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 05:27:38 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote:









On Jul 2, 9:37*am, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 04:07:00 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog

wrote:
On Jul 2, 1:31*am, wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:35 -0400, Wayne B

wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:12 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

No one doubts we have some of the most advanced medical technologies,
research, and facilities. But if you measure systems by life expectancy,
the United States, at 37th in the world for both men and women, is not
even close to having the best.

If you leave out the 20 to 30% of the US population with unhealthy
lifestyles (drugs, alcohol, violence, etc.), the numbers look quite
different. *Yes I know, it's really not fair to leave out all of those
democrats, but it is what it is.

So, if someone lives in a bad neighborhood, is a law-abiding citizen,
but is a victim of gun violence, it's that's person's fault? Or, if
all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly
stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying.

No D'Plume. It is all YOUR fault. YOUR fault for allowing the armed
person to prey on the law-abiding citizen due to economic strife or
what ever else you can blame on society to put the person into a
league of criminal activity due to desperate circumstances.

It is also YOUR fault that people can't control their poor eating
habits due to you not setting up education and health food services
for them. Not counting inviting them into your home and cooking for
them.

Poor D'Plume. You are a toad in society. You are not, and will not do
enough for the poor, helpless, and needy..

Trying to engage Ms. D'Parrot in an intelligent and reasoned debate is
an excercise in futility. *Her mind is firmly made up and is not about
to be easily confused by the facts. * That said, store owners in poor
neighborhoods, like store owners everywhere, know their customers and
stock what sells. *If people are buying vegetables and dairy products,
they'll stock vegetables and dairy products. *If people are buying
Hostess Twinkies and malt liquor, they'll stock that instead. *It is a
tribute to our wonderfully enlightened policies that people can
actually use government food stamps to buy junk food, and it sells
very well.

Wayne. Please stop calling Deplume 'D'Parrot'. Yes, I know, she
strongly resembles, with her behavior, a dimwitted African grey. But,
that is no excuse to participate in name-calling.

(There, deplume, does that make you happy?)

Well, there we are. Proof positive that you're a hypocritical liar.
You've proved your a racist in other posts, but I was wondering how
long it would take to demonstrate your low-brow lying. You're really
working hard to move to the top of the idiot list, but Knuckles is
still king of the hill.

Well, I guess that didn't make you happy. At least it didn't hurt your
name calling. I suppose you're practicing right now.

(Note the correct usage of 'your' and 'you're'. You're starting to
sound like Loogy. He fixed his problem though.)