|
Living longer? Not in US
On Jul 2, 1:31*am, wrote:
Or, if all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying. So, if a store is local it has only cheap food and is poorly stocked? Is that what you are saying? So, cheap food is only found in poorly stocked, local stores. Is that what you are saying? So, Only the local stores are stocked poorly, and will only carry cheap food, is that what you are saying? So, cheap food is only affordable from the local, and poorly stocked stores, is that what you are saying? |
Living longer? Not in US
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 04:07:00 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog
wrote: On Jul 2, 1:31*am, wrote: On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:35 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:12 -0400, Harryk wrote: No one doubts we have some of the most advanced medical technologies, research, and facilities. But if you measure systems by life expectancy, the United States, at 37th in the world for both men and women, is not even close to having the best. If you leave out the 20 to 30% of the US population with unhealthy lifestyles (drugs, alcohol, violence, etc.), the numbers look quite different. *Yes I know, it's really not fair to leave out all of those democrats, but it is what it is. So, if someone lives in a bad neighborhood, is a law-abiding citizen, but is a victim of gun violence, it's that's person's fault? Or, if all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying. No D'Plume. It is all YOUR fault. YOUR fault for allowing the armed person to prey on the law-abiding citizen due to economic strife or what ever else you can blame on society to put the person into a league of criminal activity due to desperate circumstances. It is also YOUR fault that people can't control their poor eating habits due to you not setting up education and health food services for them. Not counting inviting them into your home and cooking for them. Poor D'Plume. You are a toad in society. You are not, and will not do enough for the poor, helpless, and needy.. Trying to engage Ms. D'Parrot in an intelligent and reasoned debate is an excercise in futility. Her mind is firmly made up and is not about to be easily confused by the facts. That said, store owners in poor neighborhoods, like store owners everywhere, know their customers and stock what sells. If people are buying vegetables and dairy products, they'll stock vegetables and dairy products. If people are buying Hostess Twinkies and malt liquor, they'll stock that instead. It is a tribute to our wonderfully enlightened policies that people can actually use government food stamps to buy junk food, and it sells very well. |
Living longer? Not in US
On 7/2/2011 8:03 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Jul 2, 6:41 am, wrote: On 7/2/2011 2:31 AM, wrote: On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:35 -0400, Wayne B wrote: If you leave out the 20 to 30% of the US population with unhealthy lifestyles (drugs, alcohol, violence, etc.), the numbers look quite different. Yes I know, it's really not fair to leave out all of those democrats, but it is what it is. So, if someone lives in a bad neighborhood, is a law-abiding citizen, but is a victim of gun violence, it's that's person's fault? Or, if all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying. Read it again you dumb cluck. D'Plume can read? She sees words but her brain can't quite figure them out. |
Living longer? Not in US
On 7/2/2011 8:14 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Jul 2, 1:31 am, wrote: Or, if all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying. So, if a store is local it has only cheap food and is poorly stocked? Is that what you are saying? So, cheap food is only found in poorly stocked, local stores. Is that what you are saying? So, Only the local stores are stocked poorly, and will only carry cheap food, is that what you are saying? So, cheap food is only affordable from the local, and poorly stocked stores, is that what you are saying? Don't try to make sense of what she is saying. And never argue with her. That is, if you want to maintain your sanity. |
Living longer? Not in US
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 05:14:32 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog wrote:
On Jul 2, 1:31*am, wrote: Or, if all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying. So, if a store is local it has only cheap food and is poorly stocked? Is that what you are saying? So, cheap food is only found in poorly stocked, local stores. Is that what you are saying? So, Only the local stores are stocked poorly, and will only carry cheap food, is that what you are saying? So, cheap food is only affordable from the local, and poorly stocked stores, is that what you are saying? 'Basically', I'm LMAO! |
Living longer? Not in US
On 7/2/11 10:55 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 05:14:32 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Jul 2, 1:31 am, wrote: Or, if all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying. So, if a store is local it has only cheap food and is poorly stocked? Is that what you are saying? So, cheap food is only found in poorly stocked, local stores. Is that what you are saying? So, Only the local stores are stocked poorly, and will only carry cheap food, is that what you are saying? So, cheap food is only affordable from the local, and poorly stocked stores, is that what you are saying? 'Basically', I'm LMAO! Your lack of compassion for the poor is exceeded only by your selfishness and racism. -- Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where personal insults are not allowed? http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing |
Living longer? Not in US
On 29/06/2011 3:58 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:27:19 -0600, wrote: On 28/06/2011 6:20 PM, wf3h wrote: On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:35 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:12 -0400, wrote: No one doubts we have some of the most advanced medical technologies, research, and facilities. But if you measure systems by life expectancy, the United States, at 37th in the world for both men and women, is not even close to having the best. If you leave out the 20 to 30% of the US population with unhealthy lifestyles (drugs, alcohol, violence, etc.), the numbers look quite different. Yes I know, it's really not fair to leave out all of those democrats, but it is what it is. \\ sorry sport. the south aint democratic\ For once, for the most part your right. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_states_and_blue_states But if you look closely there is a pattern. More union, more up your ass government, more dysfunctional the non-government economy, more state taxes, more likely it is a fleabagger state. we have no unions in the US. only well run, rich countries have unions Actually not. But you go think so. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. ------ In Debt We Trust! -- Obama and the democrats, world record in debt incursion. |
Living longer? Not in US
|
Living longer? Not in US
On 02/07/2011 9:05 AM, Harryk wrote:
On 7/2/11 10:55 AM, John H wrote: On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 05:14:32 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Jul 2, 1:31 am, wrote: Or, if all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying. So, if a store is local it has only cheap food and is poorly stocked? Is that what you are saying? So, cheap food is only found in poorly stocked, local stores. Is that what you are saying? So, Only the local stores are stocked poorly, and will only carry cheap food, is that what you are saying? So, cheap food is only affordable from the local, and poorly stocked stores, is that what you are saying? 'Basically', I'm LMAO! Your lack of compassion for the poor is exceeded only by your selfishness and racism. Always the pathetic harryk a slandering. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. ------ In Debt We Trust! -- Obama and the democrats, world record in debt incursion. |
Living longer? Not in US
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:37:14 -0400, Wayne B
wrote: On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 04:07:00 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog wrote: On Jul 2, 1:31*am, wrote: On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:35 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:12 -0400, Harryk wrote: No one doubts we have some of the most advanced medical technologies, research, and facilities. But if you measure systems by life expectancy, the United States, at 37th in the world for both men and women, is not even close to having the best. If you leave out the 20 to 30% of the US population with unhealthy lifestyles (drugs, alcohol, violence, etc.), the numbers look quite different. *Yes I know, it's really not fair to leave out all of those democrats, but it is what it is. So, if someone lives in a bad neighborhood, is a law-abiding citizen, but is a victim of gun violence, it's that's person's fault? Or, if all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying. No D'Plume. It is all YOUR fault. YOUR fault for allowing the armed person to prey on the law-abiding citizen due to economic strife or what ever else you can blame on society to put the person into a league of criminal activity due to desperate circumstances. It is also YOUR fault that people can't control their poor eating habits due to you not setting up education and health food services for them. Not counting inviting them into your home and cooking for them. Poor D'Plume. You are a toad in society. You are not, and will not do enough for the poor, helpless, and needy.. Trying to engage Ms. D'Parrot in an intelligent and reasoned debate is an excercise in futility. Her mind is firmly made up and is not about to be easily confused by the facts. That said, store owners in poor neighborhoods, like store owners everywhere, know their customers and stock what sells. If people are buying vegetables and dairy products, they'll stock vegetables and dairy products. If people are buying Hostess Twinkies and malt liquor, they'll stock that instead. It is a tribute to our wonderfully enlightened policies that people can actually use government food stamps to buy junk food, and it sells very well. So, basically you agree with your right-wing buddy's racist nonsense. We get it Wayne. Now all we have to do is wait for John to tell you to stop. I have a feeling it'll be a long wait, since he's a known liar. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com