| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Ms. Bachmann is running
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:17:16 -0400, LilAbner wrote:
On 6/13/2011 10:38 PM, wrote: Looks like she's going to announce "soon." I sure how Palin announces. Then, we'll see just who is the craziest. The whole attitude that America or the Middle Class caused the problems and should bear the burden of restructuring our economy is sick. Wall Street Globalists and Bankers/ the Supplier Side government should be paying their proportion, of taxes and restitution. instead they pay what if any taxes to tax havens around the world and massive amounts to buy influence, in Washington. No argument from me. She announced her candidacy during the GOP debate. To be honest, she and Pawlenty were the most credible, even though they both fabricated at every opportunity. I watched the entire 2-hour show. Santorum seemed to ramble and kept getting back to his "family values" theme. I guess he was trying hard (no pun intended) to not have sex with Romney. He seemed out of place, esp. when he claimed to "fight the good fight," which got him booted out of the Senate by 20% in his last election. Bachmann seemed to have coherent thoughts, although she relied a lot on right-wing rhetoric. I thought she presented herself well, and seemed less crazy and extreme as she really is in reality. She did well for herself. Gingrich seemed scared. He tried to bring some nuance to his answers, but they sort of ran out of gas. It seemed like the rest of the group pretty much ignored him. Romney seemed unable to answer simple questions, but at least didn't come across as a robot. Paul was his usual self, ranting on and on about the evils of the Fed and getting the business of a strong vs. weak dollar at least partially wrong. Amazingly, a couple of the others referred to him from time to time. I thought he didn't actually exist in their frame of reference. Pawlenty was bland but not boring. He seemed the most "presidential" to me. I got the impression he answered the questions he was given fairly directly. I didn't agree with the rhetoric nonsense, but he obviously has some creds. Herman Cain seemed out of place. He almost always answered whatever question he was given with business platitudes. Also, his answer on deep dish vs. thin crust was totally wrong. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Michele Bachmann does the teabaggers proud...again. | General | |||
| Crazed Obamathugs attack Michelle Bachmann | General | |||
| Bachmann and Palin teabag! | General | |||
| The Bachmann Post | General | |||
| Michele Bachmann Has Competition | General | |||
Threaded Mode
