On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 01:09:25 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:18:04 -0400, wf3h wrote:

Between 2001 and 2010, the Bush tax cuts added $2.6 trillion to the
public debt, 50 percent of the total debt accrued during that time.
Over the past 10 years, the country has spent more than $400 billion
just servicing the debt created by the cuts.

Obama has been in office over 2 years and he had a filibuster proof
senate along with the house for several months. Why didn't the
democrats repeal those cuts? In fact the democrats extended them when
they expired. All Obama had to do was veto that bill.

These are now the Obama tax cuts, along with a 14% cut in the FICA
tax. He had doubled down on the Bush tax policy.


It's a bit more nuanced than that, but basically you're right. The
nuance includes both lack of Dem backbone and Republican
obstructionism (the "filibuster" proof senate isn't much of an
argument, since there are wide range of Dems).

On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:32:11 -0700, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 01:09:25 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:18:04 -0400, wf3h wrote:

Between 2001 and 2010, the Bush tax cuts added $2.6 trillion to the
public debt, 50 percent of the total debt accrued during that time.
Over the past 10 years, the country has spent more than $400 billion
just servicing the debt created by the cuts.

Obama has been in office over 2 years and he had a filibuster proof
senate along with the house for several months. Why didn't the
democrats repeal those cuts? In fact the democrats extended them when
they expired. All Obama had to do was veto that bill.

These are now the Obama tax cuts, along with a 14% cut in the FICA
tax. He had doubled down on the Bush tax policy.


It's a bit more nuanced than that, but basically you're right. The
nuance includes both lack of Dem backbone and Republican
obstructionism (the "filibuster" proof senate isn't much of an
argument, since there are wide range of Dems).

now THAT is strue. as folks point out, the dems are far less united in
their hatred of the middle class than the GOP is. the 1st order of
business of the GOP is to destroy the middle class

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:32:11 -0700, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 01:09:25 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:18:04 -0400, wf3h wrote:

Between 2001 and 2010, the Bush tax cuts added $2.6 trillion to the
public debt, 50 percent of the total debt accrued during that time.
Over the past 10 years, the country has spent more than $400 billion
just servicing the debt created by the cuts.

Obama has been in office over 2 years and he had a filibuster proof
senate along with the house for several months. Why didn't the
democrats repeal those cuts? In fact the democrats extended them when
they expired. All Obama had to do was veto that bill.

These are now the Obama tax cuts, along with a 14% cut in the FICA
tax. He had doubled down on the Bush tax policy.


It's a bit more nuanced than that, but basically you're right. The
nuance includes both lack of Dem backbone and Republican
obstructionism (the "filibuster" proof senate isn't much of an
argument, since there are wide range of Dems).

now THAT is strue. as folks point out, the dems are far less united in
their hatred of the middle class than the GOP is. the 1st order of
business of the GOP is to destroy the middle class

You can say it all you want, but Pelosi, Reid, Obama, his cabinet, and
the rest have said they would raise gas prices to "price us away from
petrol fuels" and they have done exactly as they said they would..

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 18:29:02 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:32:11 -0700, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 01:09:25 -0
It's a bit more nuanced than that, but basically you're right. The
nuance includes both lack of Dem backbone and Republican
obstructionism (the "filibuster" proof senate isn't much of an
argument, since there are wide range of Dems).

now THAT is strue. as folks point out, the dems are far less united in
their hatred of the middle class than the GOP is. the 1st order of
business of the GOP is to destroy the middle class

You can say it all you want, but Pelosi, Reid, Obama, his cabinet, and
the rest have said they would raise gas prices to "price us away from
petrol fuels" and they have done exactly as they said they would..

you can say it all you want, but pawlenty, palin, santorum, etc. think
the rich need a LARGER tax cut

after they just got a trillion dollar bailout

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 18:29:02 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:32:11 -0700, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 01:09:25 -0
It's a bit more nuanced than that, but basically you're right. The
nuance includes both lack of Dem backbone and Republican
obstructionism (the "filibuster" proof senate isn't much of an
argument, since there are wide range of Dems).

now THAT is strue. as folks point out, the dems are far less united in
their hatred of the middle class than the GOP is. the 1st order of
business of the GOP is to destroy the middle class

You can say it all you want, but Pelosi, Reid, Obama, his cabinet, and
the rest have said they would raise gas prices to "price us away from
petrol fuels" and they have done exactly as they said they would..

you can say it all you want, but pawlenty, palin, santorum, etc. think
the rich need a LARGER tax cut

after they just got a trillion dollar bailout

Your speculation does not stack up to my facts... Pelosi said "we are a
do nothing congress", Obama said "we need to raise the price of fossil
fuels to price folks out of the market"... What you "think" republicans
want is just your own style of bull****.

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On 09/06/2011 6:44 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 18:29:02 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:32:11 -0700, wrote:

On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 01:09:25 -0
It's a bit more nuanced than that, but basically you're right. The
nuance includes both lack of Dem backbone and Republican
obstructionism (the "filibuster" proof senate isn't much of an
argument, since there are wide range of Dems).

now THAT is strue. as folks point out, the dems are far less united in
their hatred of the middle class than the GOP is. the 1st order of
business of the GOP is to destroy the middle class

You can say it all you want, but Pelosi, Reid, Obama, his cabinet, and
the rest have said they would raise gas prices to "price us away from
petrol fuels" and they have done exactly as they said they would..

you can say it all you want, but pawlenty, palin, santorum, etc. think
the rich need a LARGER tax cut

after they just got a trillion dollar bailout

Your speculation does not stack up to my facts... Pelosi said "we are a
do nothing congress", Obama said "we need to raise the price of fossil
fuels to price folks out of the market"... What you "think" republicans
want is just your own style of bull****.

Good part is Obama's way is going to screw the fleabaggers more. Heck,
even a poor person surviving on only SS gets the gas price hike in gas,
food, even rent as the owner will want more as will the city
tax/utilities. Less of their incomes are discretionary to compensate
for the price hikes. Nice kick of inflation onto the fixed incomes and
low incomes.

But that is what this is about. Does big fat statism sized behemoth
government take the hit? Or pass the hit to the people in
hyper-inflation and a lower standard of living?

The more the government gets, the less the people get.

Flea baggers are just too dumbsh1t stupid to see it.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:46:03 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/06/2011 6:44 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...


you can say it all you want, but pawlenty, palin, santorum, etc. think
the rich need a LARGER tax cut

after they just got a trillion dollar bailout

Your speculation does not stack up to my facts... Pelosi said "we are a
do nothing congress", Obama said "we need to raise the price of fossil
fuels to price folks out of the market"... What you "think" republicans
want is just your own style of bull****.

Good part is Obama's way is going to screw the fleabaggers more. Heck,
even a poor person surviving on only SS gets the gas price hike in gas,
food, even rent as the owner will want more as will the city
tax/utilities. Less of their incomes are discretionary to compensate
for the price hikes. Nice kick of inflation onto the fixed incomes and
low incomes.

let's see...gas approached 4 under bush

guess that was obama's fault, too.


But that is what this is about. Does big fat statism sized behemoth
government take the hit? Or pass the hit to the people in
hyper-inflation and a lower standard of living?

The more the government gets, the less the people get.

except the govt never stole 10 trillion in 1 year like wall street did

and the right loves it


Flea baggers are just too dumbsh1t stupid to see it.

On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 08:44:58 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 8 Jun 201

you can say it all you want, but pawlenty, palin, santorum, etc. think
the rich need a LARGER tax cut

after they just got a trillion dollar bailout

Your speculation does not stack up to my facts... Pelosi said "we are a
do nothing congress", Obama said "we need to raise the price of fossil
fuels to price folks out of the market"... What you "think" republicans
want is just your own style of bull****.

no one cares what she says. what matters is actiong

and the GOP is destroying america

i have the facts

-tax cut in 2001
-tax cut in 2003
-CSE's that bankrupted the economy

those are actions

they were done by the right wing.

so i have facts

you have fairy tales

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 08:44:58 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 8 Jun 201

you can say it all you want, but pawlenty, palin, santorum, etc. think
the rich need a LARGER tax cut

after they just got a trillion dollar bailout

Your speculation does not stack up to my facts... Pelosi said "we are a
do nothing congress", Obama said "we need to raise the price of fossil
fuels to price folks out of the market"... What you "think" republicans
want is just your own style of bull****.

no one cares what she says. what matters is actiong

and the GOP is destroying america

i have the facts

-tax cut in 2001
-tax cut in 2003
-CSE's that bankrupted the economy

those are actions

they were done by the right wing.

so i have facts

you have fairy tales

I have Pelosi tieing up the congress for two years with gutless
investigations against Scooter Libby while doing everything she could to
raise the price of oil and destroy the economy..

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On 09/06/2011 6:16 PM, wf3h wrote:

-tax cut in 2001
-tax cut in 2003
-Currency fraud, 2006 democratic congress.
-Interest rate inversion, congress ignores, 2007.
-BO (Bailout Obama coming, market crashes 2008.

There fixed it for ya fleabagger.

Not much has changed in 3 years either other than bankrupcies and
foreclosures of Americans are at an all time high.

Keep up voting for fleabaggers and ruin the American dream for a
generation or two. Best estimates I have is even f turned around now,
it might last 10 years. Borderline hopeless, that the US is bankrupt
just that the gavel hasn't struck yet.

Yep, hopelessness and chumps. It is an Obamanation and legacy.

-CSE's that bankrupted the economy

those are actions

they were done by the right wing.

so i have facts

you have fairy tales


--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.