On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 01:17:05 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 07/06/2011 6:09 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 13:31:50 -0600,
wrote:

On 05/06/2011 7:32 AM, John H wrote:
... Gaddafi is killing his own people (who happen to be killing soldiers in Gaddaffi's army).

What would Obama do if his own people started killing soldiers in HIS army?

Nothing? Is that what he expects Gaddafi to do?

I've yet to see a liberal answer this question. They usually jump right to name-calling.

Obama is a corrupt hypocritical idiot treating Americans and others as
if they are stupid. Many are.

when did you first start confusing obama with bush?

Libya is about getting Libyan oil cheap,

uh...the US doesnt buy libyan oil.

Doesn't have to. Europe now competes to get oil that might have been
sold to the US. Russia sells much of its directly to China.

so you were wrong when you said the US was in this for libyan oil?

thanks. i already knew that.


Normally a country can be kept in line with the UN-IMF regime, but Libya
government and banks have almost zero debt. Debt is a form of slavery.

which is why wall street just imposed the largest debt on the american
middle class since 29

Wall street didn't, corrupt politicians did.

so the right winger has never heard of

consolidated supervised entities

collateralized debt swaps

which cost the US economy ten TRILLION dollars

figures.


Look at who signed the
bailout checks. Bush and Obama with Congressional/Senate approval by
silence.

bailout

gee. why a bailout? because of WALL STREET GREED.

DUH

Egypt went from a democracy to a military dictatorship and Obama helped
it along. Go figure, Obama helped destroy a democracy.

HAHAHAHAHA gee and what did bush do about egyptian democracy??

NOTHING!!

Opened up his mouth and talked Mubarak out of office with IMF and
UN-diplomatic extortions. look at IMF as the NWO economic extortion arm
of the UN-Euro-US regime.

really? bush was president in 2011?


Which is why IMF could not control Libya -- Libay has inconsequential
near zero debt. Revoking credit on someone who does not need credit
isn't going to work, so use NATO to bomb them.

and the US role here?

about zero

so your paranoid view of the US and your support of ghaddafi is noted


This isn't unrelated to Gbagbo of Ivory Coast. Not at all, Gbagbo and
Gaddafi wanted an African unification and labour standards etc. Gbagbo
was not a UN puppet, so the UN financially and with arms backed a Muslim
rebellion with their puppet boy.

other than the fact he lost a fair election

Fair? UN armed and economically supported the rebels.

HAHAHAHAAH

they were armed AFTER gbagbo LOST the elections, you MORON!


Egypt was a democracy, and Mubarak was elected.

HAHAHAAH more delusions from the right. mubarak was elected!!!

he hates obama so much he's willing to lie

The NATO-US-Euro Regime marches on. Just like Nazi Germany, one country
at a time.

PPPHWWWEETT!!

GODWIN'S LAW VIOLATION!!

Not much different in WW II Germany invading Austria than NATO going to
Libya. Libya didn't provoke it this time. US-UN Regime did.

really? how many concentreation camps NATO set up?

oh. none. i've been to dachau. you're just an asshole


My guess is Kaddafi had the guts to tell Obama and UN NWO to shove it
where the sun don't shine. Taht is why hey want him dead, vengeance.

The only reason Obama got Osama, is it became politically convenient to
do. Botching the assassination attempt on Kaddafi blowing up a home
with 3 unarmed innocent uninvolved children in it, Obama needed to stop
the horror factor of US child killing, get Osama....

Plus, I am sure Obama would not like it if a GOP stood up in Congress
and asked Obama, if you have known where Osama is, why is it taking 8
months to get him? Hearing that from a GOP has obvious political risks.