On 14/05/2011 1:00 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2011 14:36:15 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sat, 14 May 2011 04:01:03 -0400, wrote:

were reagan and bush liberals? they were the biggest spenders in US
history


They certainly were not fiscal conservatives

And they weren't the biggest spenders in history. President Obams passed
them in the first year!

wrong. bush's last budget had a deficit of 1.2 TRILLION.

So was Bush signing the checks while Obama was in office?

but he's white...so we can't blame him

So is Obama being black an excuse or a reason?

This reminds me of the news. Progressives make
so many inaccurate representations in one sentence or point, you just
can't address them all...


HAHAHAHA and you notice he LIES about bush then blames the black guy!

Best part about fleabaggers is watching them while. Cheap ad free
entertainment.
--
Take a look at ANY country, more debt is more problems. So why do we
allow our governments more debt? Selfishness, greed, denial, ignorance?

Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/05/2011 10:29 AM, Harryk wrote:
Ron Paul, the Texas congressman, declared his (third) candidacy for
president Friday on ‘Good Morning America.’ The ‘intellectual
grandfather’ of the tea party movement is a constitutional purist who’s
as popular among his fervent followers as he is disliked by the GOP
establishment. He’s a dark horse pushing for an upset victory.
- - -

Ah, yes...Crazy Ron...about as much chance of winning the presidency as,
say, Newt, the Donald, the Sara, the Michele, the Mitt, et cetera.

Hey, we tried it the liberal debt and spend way. All to show for it is a
whole lot of ongoing forclosures, and more than $4 trillion in more DEBT
(so far as more is coming).

I would say ABO, Anyone But Obama.

You don't have a say, dickwad.

On Sat, 14 May 2011 06:00:45 -0400, Harryk
sent the following message
Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/05/2011 10:29 AM, Harryk wrote:
Ron Paul, the Texas congressman, declared his (third) candidacy
for
president Friday on ‘Good Morning America.’ The ‘intellectual
grandfather’ of the tea party movement is a constitutional
purist who’s
as popular among his fervent followers as he is disliked by the
GOP
establishment. He’s a dark horse pushing for an upset victory.
- - -

Ah, yes...Crazy Ron...about as much chance of winning the
presidency as,
say, Newt, the Donald, the Sara, the Michele, the Mitt, et
cetera.

Hey, we tried it the liberal debt and spend way. All to show for
it is a
whole lot of ongoing forclosures, and more than $4 trillion in
more DEBT
(so far as more is coming).

I would say ABO, Anyone But Obama.

You don't have a say, dickwad.

As much say as you, eh. At least as far as this forum goes.
Canadians have every reason to be concerned about US politics and
politicans. Especialy our beloved BHO.

On Sat, 14 May 2011 07:59:34 -0400, Percy wrote:

On Sat, 14 May 2011 06:00:45 -0400, Harryk
sent the following message
Canuck57 wrote:


I would say ABO, Anyone But Obama.

You don't have a say, dickwad.

As much say as you, eh. At least as far as this forum goes.
Canadians have every reason to be concerned about US politics and
politicans. Especialy our beloved BHO.

i agree. after all it was BHO who killed 4400 US troops in iraq

oh. wait that was bush

BUT it was obama who spent a TRILLION in iraq

oh. wait...bush

uh...it was OBAMA who started the depression...oh...hold on...it was
bush


yeah i can see why you think BHO is a failure

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 14 May 2011 07:59:34 -0400, Percy wrote:

On Sat, 14 May 2011 06:00:45 -0400, Harryk
sent the following message
Canuck57 wrote:


I would say ABO, Anyone But Obama.

You don't have a say, dickwad.

As much say as you, eh. At least as far as this forum goes.
Canadians have every reason to be concerned about US politics and
politicans. Especialy our beloved BHO.

i agree. after all it was BHO who killed 4400 US troops in iraq

oh. wait that was bush

BUT it was obama who spent a TRILLION in iraq

oh. wait...bush

uh...it was OBAMA who started the depression...oh...hold on...it was
bush


yeah i can see why you think BHO is a failure

It was President Bush that told us he wanted to keep gas prices high to
feed General Electric, oh wait, that was President Obama...

It was President Bush's advisor who said "never let a good disaster go
to waste" (in reference to the gulf coast oil spill, oh wait, that was
President Obama's aide.

It was President Bush who Bowed to the Arab Sheik, and a few others,
shut down drilling all over the country while saying he was opening it
up, it was President Bush who shut down all exploration off the coast
but sent billions to Brazil to help them explore, and let the Chinese
and anyone else who wants to drill off our coast.. Oh wait, that was
President Obama....

It was President Bush who promised to shut down gitmo, get us out of
Afghanistan, then attacked Libya for Italy and France's oil interests,
sold health care to the health care industry, promised "sunshine" and
has been the very most secretive administration in history, and let's
not forget, the first piece of **** in history to personally attack
private individuals and corporations, directly from the Oval office, oh
wait, that was President Obama...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On Sat, 14 May 2011 01:37:36 -0400, sent the
following message
I think it is safe to assume both parties will advance"" a
candidate who
has drunk the corporate kool ade. You can get elected without about
a
billion bucks these days and there is only one place where you can
get
that kind of money.
That is why all of these guys seem to have the same financial staff.
Can anyone remember when we didn't have a senior advisor in the
White
House who wasn't from Goldman Sachs?

You just stole all of krause's thunder.

On Fri, 13 May 2011 12:29:20 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

Ron Paul, the Texas congressman, declared his (third) candidacy for
president Friday on ‘Good Morning America.’ The ‘intellectual
grandfather’ of the tea party movement is a constitutional purist who’s
as popular among his fervent followers as he is disliked by the GOP
establishment. He’s a dark horse pushing for an upset victory.
- - -

Ah, yes...Crazy Ron...about as much chance of winning the presidency as,
say, Newt, the Donald, the Sara, the Michele, the Mitt, et cetera.

the GOP is so far right that ronald reagan would be unelectable today.

"wf3h" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 13 May 2011 12:29:20 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

Ron Paul, the Texas congressman, declared his (third) candidacy for
president Friday on ‘Good Morning America.’ The ‘intellectual
grandfather’ of the tea party movement is a constitutional purist who’s
as popular among his fervent followers as he is disliked by the GOP
establishment. He’s a dark horse pushing for an upset victory.
- - -

Ah, yes...Crazy Ron...about as much chance of winning the presidency as,
say, Newt, the Donald, the Sara, the Michele, the Mitt, et cetera.

the GOP is so far right that ronald reagan would be unelectable today.

*******************

I guess it's every man for themselves... and those lucky enough to be the
winners like it like that.
What I find hard to understand is why people at the bottom of the barrel
would still go out and support that system. You'd think self interest would
kick in for them just as it does for the ruling elite.

True North wrote:


"wf3h" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 13 May 2011 12:29:20 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

Ron Paul, the Texas congressman, declared his (third) candidacy for
president Friday on ‘Good Morning America.’ The ‘intellectual
grandfather’ of the tea party movement is a constitutional purist who’s
as popular among his fervent followers as he is disliked by the GOP
establishment. He’s a dark horse pushing for an upset victory.
- - -

Ah, yes...Crazy Ron...about as much chance of winning the presidency as,
say, Newt, the Donald, the Sara, the Michele, the Mitt, et cetera.

the GOP is so far right that ronald reagan would be unelectable today.

*******************

I guess it's every man for themselves... and those lucky enough to be
the winners like it like that.
What I find hard to understand is why people at the bottom of the barrel
would still go out and support that system. You'd think self interest
would kick in for them just as it does for the ruling elite.


I'm hoping for heads on pikes...if I were in charge, I'd start with the
boys on wall street, then the bankers, then the health insurance
companies, then the holier than thou religious fanatics.

On Sun, 15 May 2011 12:57:47 -0300, "True North"
wrote:



"wf3h" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 13 May 2011 12:29:20 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

Ron Paul, the Texas congressman, declared his (third) candidacy for
president Friday on ‘Good Morning America.’ The ‘intellectual
grandfather’ of the tea party movement is a constitutional purist who’s
as popular among his fervent followers as he is disliked by the GOP
establishment. He’s a dark horse pushing for an upset victory.
- - -

Ah, yes...Crazy Ron...about as much chance of winning the presidency as,
say, Newt, the Donald, the Sara, the Michele, the Mitt, et cetera.

the GOP is so far right that ronald reagan would be unelectable today.

*******************

I guess it's every man for themselves... and those lucky enough to be the
winners like it like that.
What I find hard to understand is why people at the bottom of the barrel
would still go out and support that system. You'd think self interest would
kick in for them just as it does for the ruling elite.


it's absolutely amazing how fundamentalist they are...in social
values, with rick santorum talking about 'collective' moral values
that enforce religion...and fundamentalist supply side economics which
views salaries as a drain on the economy, and only the rich need to
have money