On Wed, 4 May 2011 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

Here, just for the fun of it...


http://utopianist.com/wp-content/upl...lled-trump.jpg

Careful, Tim. The liberals are already *extremely* upset that Osama didn't receive a fair trial, but
was instead shot while defenseless.

You know, I've reached a decision. When Harry accuses Scotty of pedophilia, and therefore is
accusing Scotty's daughter of incest, I think he's committing a vile act. Likewise, when Scotty
accuses Harry of pedophilia, without any basis, Scotty is committing a vile act.

Therefore, I've decided to have nothing to do with either of them. They both owe each other an
apology. Hopefully they're both man enough to do so.

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 4 May 2011 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

Here, just for the fun of it...


http://utopianist.com/wp-content/upl...lled-trump.jpg

Careful, Tim. The liberals are already *extremely* upset that Osama didn't receive a fair trial, but
was instead shot while defenseless.

You know, I've reached a decision. When Harry accuses Scotty of pedophilia, and therefore is
accusing Scotty's daughter of incest, I think he's committing a vile act. Likewise, when Scotty
accuses Harry of pedophilia, without any basis, Scotty is committing a vile act.

Therefore, I've decided to have nothing to do with either of them. They both owe each other an
apology. Hopefully they're both man enough to do so.

You are such a suck up... Tim must be thrilled to have a dingleball like
you...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On 04/05/2011 9:46 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2011 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Here, just for the fun of it...


http://utopianist.com/wp-content/upl...lled-trump.jpg

Careful, Tim. The liberals are already *extremely* upset that Osama didn't receive a fair trial, but
was instead shot while defenseless.

You know, I've reached a decision. When Harry accuses Scotty of pedophilia, and therefore is
accusing Scotty's daughter of incest, I think he's committing a vile act. Likewise, when Scotty
accuses Harry of pedophilia, without any basis, Scotty is committing a vile act.

Therefore, I've decided to have nothing to do with either of them. They both owe each other an
apology. Hopefully they're both man enough to do so.

Freaking fleabagger lefties, didn't get to spend millions on useless
liberal lawyers? Wow, my sympathies not. Osama needed it. Over 300
indictments and warrants properly processed from multiple
countries...Osama just needed a bullet.

Think of the money it saved taxpayers, the chopper loss was peanuts.
Keeping Osama for trial then incareration costs... best spent bullets
were the ones sent to Osama.
--
I can assure you that the road to prosperity is not paved with
fleabagger debt.

Take a look at ANY country, more debt more problems. So why do we allow
our governments more debt? Selfishness, greed?

In article ,
says...

On 04/05/2011 9:46 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2011 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Here, just for the fun of it...


http://utopianist.com/wp-content/upl...lled-trump.jpg

Careful, Tim. The liberals are already *extremely* upset that Osama didn't receive a fair trial, but
was instead shot while defenseless.

You know, I've reached a decision. When Harry accuses Scotty of pedophilia, and therefore is
accusing Scotty's daughter of incest, I think he's committing a vile act. Likewise, when Scotty
accuses Harry of pedophilia, without any basis, Scotty is committing a vile act.

Therefore, I've decided to have nothing to do with either of them. They both owe each other an
apology. Hopefully they're both man enough to do so.

Freaking fleabagger lefties, didn't get to spend millions on useless
liberal lawyers? Wow, my sympathies not. Osama needed it. Over 300
indictments and warrants properly processed from multiple
countries...Osama just needed a bullet.

Think of the money it saved taxpayers, the chopper loss was peanuts.
Keeping Osama for trial then incareration costs... best spent bullets
were the ones sent to Osama.

Just think of it as campaign finance...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:25:15 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 04 May 2011 11:38:43 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 04/05/2011 9:46 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2011 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Here, just for the fun of it...


http://utopianist.com/wp-content/upl...lled-trump.jpg

Careful, Tim. The liberals are already *extremely* upset that Osama didn't receive a fair trial, but
was instead shot while defenseless.

You know, I've reached a decision. When Harry accuses Scotty of pedophilia, and therefore is
accusing Scotty's daughter of incest, I think he's committing a vile act. Likewise, when Scotty
accuses Harry of pedophilia, without any basis, Scotty is committing a vile act.

Therefore, I've decided to have nothing to do with either of them. They both owe each other an
apology. Hopefully they're both man enough to do so.

Freaking fleabagger lefties, didn't get to spend millions on useless
liberal lawyers? Wow, my sympathies not. Osama needed it. Over 300
indictments and warrants properly processed from multiple
countries...Osama just needed a bullet.

Think of the money it saved taxpayers, the chopper loss was peanuts.
Keeping Osama for trial then incareration costs... best spent bullets
were the ones sent to Osama.


I am happy that Obama has repealed the flawed Carter policy of not
targeting people for assassination.
Maybe some day we can return to the Eisenhower policy of shaping civil
war outcomes using covert means and without sending in a 150,000
troops.

It was certainly clear that we could have taken OBL alive but they
made the right choice and blew his head off on site.

Plume, before you protest that, are you really saying a SEAL could
not have wrestled a sickly, 54 year old, unarmed man to the ground if
he wanted to? They saw him, they shot him end of story.

There was no such repeal of any policy. We target people all the time.
I believe it's mostly appropriate, given what they've done or are
doing.

So, you're claiming to know all the details of the raid, including the
motion by motion action? Sounds to me like you really don't give Obama
an "A". Rather, you're just looking for a way to put him down.

On Wed, 04 May 2011 12:42:22 -0700, sent the
following message
On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:25:15 -0400, wrote:


On Wed, 04 May 2011 11:38:43 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 04/05/2011 9:46 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2011 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Here, just for the fun of it...



http://utopianist.com/wp-content/upl...ama-bin-laden-
killed-trump.jpg

Careful, Tim. The liberals are already *extremely* upset that
Osama didn't receive a fair trial, but
was instead shot while defenseless.

You know, I've reached a decision. When Harry accuses Scotty of
pedophilia, and therefore is
accusing Scotty's daughter of incest, I think he's committing a
vile act. Likewise, when Scotty
accuses Harry of pedophilia, without any basis, Scotty is
committing a vile act.

Therefore, I've decided to have nothing to do with either of
them. They both owe each other an
apology. Hopefully they're both man enough to do so.

Freaking fleabagger lefties, didn't get to spend millions on
useless
liberal lawyers? Wow, my sympathies not. Osama needed it. Over
300
indictments and warrants properly processed from multiple
countries...Osama just needed a bullet.

Think of the money it saved taxpayers, the chopper loss was
peanuts.
Keeping Osama for trial then incareration costs... best spent
bullets
were the ones sent to Osama.


I am happy that Obama has repealed the flawed Carter policy of not
targeting people for assassination.
Maybe some day we can return to the Eisenhower policy of shaping
civil
war outcomes using covert means and without sending in a 150,000
troops.

It was certainly clear that we could have taken OBL alive but they
made the right choice and blew his head off on site.

Plume, before you protest that, are you really saying a SEAL could
not have wrestled a sickly, 54 year old, unarmed man to the ground
if
he wanted to? They saw him, they shot him end of story.


There was no such repeal of any policy. We target people all the
time.
I believe it's mostly appropriate, given what they've done or are
doing.


So, you're claiming to know all the details of the raid, including
the
motion by motion action? Sounds to me like you really don't give
Obama
an "A". Rather, you're just looking for a way to put him down.

I'll igive him an A+ for Asshat. I guess it's ok for your guy to
murder a suspected terrorist. I expect you'll be wanting to eliminate
any terrorist you come across, now the precident has been set. Might
as well start in Gitmo I guess GWB wasn't so inhumane after all. I
also understand a little gentle waterboarding and mild torture helped
to extract vital intel leading to OBLs discovery. You can apologise
to the prior administration whenever you are man enough. Snerk

On Thu, 05 May 2011 13:55:37 -0400, sent the
following message
On Wed, 04 May 2011 12:42:22 -0700, wrote:


On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:25:15 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 04 May 2011 11:38:43 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 04/05/2011 9:46 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2011 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Here, just for the fun of it...



http://utopianist.com/wp-content/upl...ama-bin-laden-
killed-trump.jpg

Careful, Tim. The liberals are already *extremely* upset that
Osama didn't receive a fair trial, but
was instead shot while defenseless.

You know, I've reached a decision. When Harry accuses Scotty
of pedophilia, and therefore is
accusing Scotty's daughter of incest, I think he's committing
a vile act. Likewise, when Scotty
accuses Harry of pedophilia, without any basis, Scotty is
committing a vile act.

Therefore, I've decided to have nothing to do with either of
them. They both owe each other an
apology. Hopefully they're both man enough to do so.

Freaking fleabagger lefties, didn't get to spend millions on
useless
liberal lawyers? Wow, my sympathies not. Osama needed it.
Over 300
indictments and warrants properly processed from multiple
countries...Osama just needed a bullet.

Think of the money it saved taxpayers, the chopper loss was
peanuts.
Keeping Osama for trial then incareration costs... best spent
bullets
were the ones sent to Osama.


I am happy that Obama has repealed the flawed Carter policy of not
targeting people for assassination.
Maybe some day we can return to the Eisenhower policy of shaping
civil
war outcomes using covert means and without sending in a 150,000
troops.

It was certainly clear that we could have taken OBL alive but they
made the right choice and blew his head off on site.

Plume, before you protest that, are you really saying a SEAL
could
not have wrestled a sickly, 54 year old, unarmed man to the
ground if
he wanted to? They saw him, they shot him end of story.

There was no such repeal of any policy. We target people all the
time.
I believe it's mostly appropriate, given what they've done or are
doing.

So, you're claiming to know all the details of the raid, including
the
motion by motion action? Sounds to me like you really don't give
Obama
an "A". Rather, you're just looking for a way to put him down.




Not at all but it is clear this was a hit, no more, no less. The
SEALs
have reported that there was only one armed person there, the
courier,
who they shot right away, then they shot 3 more unarmed people,
including Bin Laden. This is the report the government has
released.
I think they all needed killing.

Silly you. You say the murders of obl and company were premeditated.
Like a mob hit? Or first degree murder? The libbers ain't gonna like
their pres. being named a common fellon. There must be some way to
blame it on GWB.

wrote:
On Thu, 05 May 2011 14:17:11 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 05 May 2011 13:55:37 -0400, sent the
following message
On Wed, 04 May 2011 12:42:22 -0700, wrote:




Not at all but it is clear this was a hit, no more, no less. The
SEALs
have reported that there was only one armed person there, the
courier,
who they shot right away, then they shot 3 more unarmed people,
including Bin Laden. This is the report the government has
released.
I think they all needed killing.
Silly you. You say the murders of obl and company were premeditated.
Like a mob hit? Or first degree murder? The libbers ain't gonna like
their pres. being named a common fellon. There must be some way to
blame it on GWB.


I think the correct term is "executive action"




I think the correct procedure is to ignore a "regular" hiding behind a
new id and who can't spell a simple word like felon.

On Thu, 05 May 2011 15:57:16 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 05 May 2011 14:17:11 -0400, Percy wrote:

On Thu, 05 May 2011 13:55:37 -0400, sent the
following message
On Wed, 04 May 2011 12:42:22 -0700, wrote:






Not at all but it is clear this was a hit, no more, no less. The
SEALs
have reported that there was only one armed person there, the
courier,
who they shot right away, then they shot 3 more unarmed people,
including Bin Laden. This is the report the government has
released.
I think they all needed killing.

Silly you. You say the murders of obl and company were premeditated.
Like a mob hit? Or first degree murder? The libbers ain't gonna like
their pres. being named a common fellon. There must be some way to
blame it on GWB.


I think the correct term is "executive action"


Actually, it's really easy to blame it on Bush. He wasn't really
interested in getting OBL after the first try. He said so publically.
If he had not invaded Iraq, he could have concentrated on the
situation in Afg.

On Thu, 05 May 2011 13:55:37 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 04 May 2011 12:42:22 -0700, wrote:

On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:25:15 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 04 May 2011 11:38:43 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 04/05/2011 9:46 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2011 04:50:52 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Here, just for the fun of it...


http://utopianist.com/wp-content/upl...lled-trump.jpg

Careful, Tim. The liberals are already *extremely* upset that Osama didn't receive a fair trial, but
was instead shot while defenseless.

You know, I've reached a decision. When Harry accuses Scotty of pedophilia, and therefore is
accusing Scotty's daughter of incest, I think he's committing a vile act. Likewise, when Scotty
accuses Harry of pedophilia, without any basis, Scotty is committing a vile act.

Therefore, I've decided to have nothing to do with either of them. They both owe each other an
apology. Hopefully they're both man enough to do so.

Freaking fleabagger lefties, didn't get to spend millions on useless
liberal lawyers? Wow, my sympathies not. Osama needed it. Over 300
indictments and warrants properly processed from multiple
countries...Osama just needed a bullet.

Think of the money it saved taxpayers, the chopper loss was peanuts.
Keeping Osama for trial then incareration costs... best spent bullets
were the ones sent to Osama.


I am happy that Obama has repealed the flawed Carter policy of not
targeting people for assassination.
Maybe some day we can return to the Eisenhower policy of shaping civil
war outcomes using covert means and without sending in a 150,000
troops.

It was certainly clear that we could have taken OBL alive but they
made the right choice and blew his head off on site.

Plume, before you protest that, are you really saying a SEAL could
not have wrestled a sickly, 54 year old, unarmed man to the ground if
he wanted to? They saw him, they shot him end of story.

There was no such repeal of any policy. We target people all the time.
I believe it's mostly appropriate, given what they've done or are
doing.

So, you're claiming to know all the details of the raid, including the
motion by motion action? Sounds to me like you really don't give Obama
an "A". Rather, you're just looking for a way to put him down.


Not at all but it is clear this was a hit, no more, no less. The SEALs
have reported that there was only one armed person there, the courier,
who they shot right away, then they shot 3 more unarmed people,
including Bin Laden. This is the report the government has released.
I think they all needed killing.

So, you don't know all or even most of the details, yet you're
claiming you know it was a "hit." Sounds like you're just looking
around for an excuse to claim Obama is evil.