| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 3/27/2011 1:23 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 22:51:41 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:47:43 -0400, wrote: On 3/25/2011 10:25 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:40:23 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:23:02 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:17:34 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:29:34 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:03:29 -0700, wrote: The 2012-2016 president will have to tell 83 million boomers they are not going to get everything they were promised. That may get ugly. Nobody ever gets "everything" they're promised. It's the nature of democracy and compromise to achieve the best for everyone. So far the SS/MC recipients have received more than they were promised but that is going to turn around. So, you don't mind giving back some of your ill-gotten gains? Cool! I fully expect to. It is already happening tho. They are taxing the hell out of my "tax free" social security and when I get to Medicare I expect the part B and "gap" insurance to be higher than it is now. I have already been told part D is not as good as buying the Medco/WalMart plan. Since I don't really use any drugs, I don't care about that. $25 a year pretty much covers my fish oil and a multivitamin every day. Why do you allow this little girl to suck you into these dumb off topic discussions? I enjoy bantering with Plume. The naivete of youth is always refreshing. Gee I didn't realize senility was considered an advantage! LOL Well there's a dumb remark, dear. It's funny that you find that amusing. One day you will be dealing with senility in one way or another and I'm certain you wont be finding that funny. Have a nice life dear. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 22:23:04 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 22:51:41 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:47:43 -0400, wrote: On 3/25/2011 10:25 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:40:23 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:23:02 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:17:34 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:29:34 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:03:29 -0700, wrote: The 2012-2016 president will have to tell 83 million boomers they are not going to get everything they were promised. That may get ugly. Nobody ever gets "everything" they're promised. It's the nature of democracy and compromise to achieve the best for everyone. So far the SS/MC recipients have received more than they were promised but that is going to turn around. So, you don't mind giving back some of your ill-gotten gains? Cool! I fully expect to. It is already happening tho. They are taxing the hell out of my "tax free" social security and when I get to Medicare I expect the part B and "gap" insurance to be higher than it is now. I have already been told part D is not as good as buying the Medco/WalMart plan. Since I don't really use any drugs, I don't care about that. $25 a year pretty much covers my fish oil and a multivitamin every day. Why do you allow this little girl to suck you into these dumb off topic discussions? I enjoy bantering with Plume. The naivete of youth is always refreshing. Gee I didn't realize senility was considered an advantage! LOL I am not the one who has trouble remembering what we were talking about ;-) It is a strange comment from a person who believes in the unions and their policy of paying the oldest and longest serving employees the most, regardless of performance. It must really aggravate you retired corporate slugs that there are still a few employees around who are not at-will serfs, to be disposed of on a whim so the boys in the suits can take home bigger "bonuses." BTW, are you also imposed to military personnel getting paid more the longer they serve? |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
says... wrote: On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 22:23:04 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 22:51:41 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:47:43 -0400, wrote: On 3/25/2011 10:25 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:40:23 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:23:02 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:17:34 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:29:34 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:03:29 -0700, wrote: The 2012-2016 president will have to tell 83 million boomers they are not going to get everything they were promised. That may get ugly. Nobody ever gets "everything" they're promised. It's the nature of democracy and compromise to achieve the best for everyone. So far the SS/MC recipients have received more than they were promised but that is going to turn around. So, you don't mind giving back some of your ill-gotten gains? Cool! I fully expect to. It is already happening tho. They are taxing the hell out of my "tax free" social security and when I get to Medicare I expect the part B and "gap" insurance to be higher than it is now. I have already been told part D is not as good as buying the Medco/WalMart plan. Since I don't really use any drugs, I don't care about that. $25 a year pretty much covers my fish oil and a multivitamin every day. Why do you allow this little girl to suck you into these dumb off topic discussions? I enjoy bantering with Plume. The naivete of youth is always refreshing. Gee I didn't realize senility was considered an advantage! LOL I am not the one who has trouble remembering what we were talking about ;-) It is a strange comment from a person who believes in the unions and their policy of paying the oldest and longest serving employees the most, regardless of performance. It must really aggravate you retired corporate slugs that there are still a few employees around who are not at-will serfs, to be disposed of on a whim so the boys in the suits can take home bigger "bonuses." BTW, are you also imposed to military personnel getting paid more the longer they serve? Imposed?? Don, come quick! |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Harryk wrote:
wrote: On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 22:23:04 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 22:51:41 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:47:43 -0400, wrote: On 3/25/2011 10:25 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:40:23 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:23:02 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:17:34 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:29:34 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:03:29 -0700, wrote: The 2012-2016 president will have to tell 83 million boomers they are not going to get everything they were promised. That may get ugly. Nobody ever gets "everything" they're promised. It's the nature of democracy and compromise to achieve the best for everyone. So far the SS/MC recipients have received more than they were promised but that is going to turn around. So, you don't mind giving back some of your ill-gotten gains? Cool! I fully expect to. It is already happening tho. They are taxing the hell out of my "tax free" social security and when I get to Medicare I expect the part B and "gap" insurance to be higher than it is now. I have already been told part D is not as good as buying the Medco/WalMart plan. Since I don't really use any drugs, I don't care about that. $25 a year pretty much covers my fish oil and a multivitamin every day. Why do you allow this little girl to suck you into these dumb off topic discussions? I enjoy bantering with Plume. The naivete of youth is always refreshing. Gee I didn't realize senility was considered an advantage! LOL I am not the one who has trouble remembering what we were talking about ;-) It is a strange comment from a person who believes in the unions and their policy of paying the oldest and longest serving employees the most, regardless of performance. It must really aggravate you retired corporate slugs that there are still a few employees around who are not at-will serfs, to be disposed of on a whim so the boys in the suits can take home bigger "bonuses." BTW, are you also imposed to military personnel getting paid more the longer they serve? Their promotions rely on merit, dumbass. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:48:08 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:59:04 -0400, Harryk wrote: wrote: On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 22:23:04 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 22:51:41 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:47:43 -0400, wrote: On 3/25/2011 10:25 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:40:23 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:23:02 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:17:34 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:29:34 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:03:29 -0700, wrote: The 2012-2016 president will have to tell 83 million boomers they are not going to get everything they were promised. That may get ugly. Nobody ever gets "everything" they're promised. It's the nature of democracy and compromise to achieve the best for everyone. So far the SS/MC recipients have received more than they were promised but that is going to turn around. So, you don't mind giving back some of your ill-gotten gains? Cool! I fully expect to. It is already happening tho. They are taxing the hell out of my "tax free" social security and when I get to Medicare I expect the part B and "gap" insurance to be higher than it is now. I have already been told part D is not as good as buying the Medco/WalMart plan. Since I don't really use any drugs, I don't care about that. $25 a year pretty much covers my fish oil and a multivitamin every day. Why do you allow this little girl to suck you into these dumb off topic discussions? I enjoy bantering with Plume. The naivete of youth is always refreshing. Gee I didn't realize senility was considered an advantage! LOL I am not the one who has trouble remembering what we were talking about ;-) It is a strange comment from a person who believes in the unions and their policy of paying the oldest and longest serving employees the most, regardless of performance. BTW, are you also imposed to military personnel getting paid more the longer they serve? Most military people get promoted by performance reports and when they are passed over too many times they are usually pressured to get out. Yup, that's the way it's done. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
says... On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:48:08 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:59:04 -0400, Harryk wrote: wrote: On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 22:23:04 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 22:51:41 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:47:43 -0400, wrote: On 3/25/2011 10:25 PM, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:40:23 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:23:02 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:17:34 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:29:34 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:03:29 -0700, wrote: The 2012-2016 president will have to tell 83 million boomers they are not going to get everything they were promised. That may get ugly. Nobody ever gets "everything" they're promised. It's the nature of democracy and compromise to achieve the best for everyone. So far the SS/MC recipients have received more than they were promised but that is going to turn around. So, you don't mind giving back some of your ill-gotten gains? Cool! I fully expect to. It is already happening tho. They are taxing the hell out of my "tax free" social security and when I get to Medicare I expect the part B and "gap" insurance to be higher than it is now. I have already been told part D is not as good as buying the Medco/WalMart plan. Since I don't really use any drugs, I don't care about that. $25 a year pretty much covers my fish oil and a multivitamin every day. Why do you allow this little girl to suck you into these dumb off topic discussions? I enjoy bantering with Plume. The naivete of youth is always refreshing. Gee I didn't realize senility was considered an advantage! LOL I am not the one who has trouble remembering what we were talking about ;-) It is a strange comment from a person who believes in the unions and their policy of paying the oldest and longest serving employees the most, regardless of performance. BTW, are you also imposed to military personnel getting paid more the longer they serve? Most military people get promoted by performance reports and when they are passed over too many times they are usually pressured to get out. Yup, that's the way it's done. And the way it should be.. If there was a union in the service those "underperformers" would be handed a broom and a raise and be allowed to work until retirement making more pay than the guys really doing the work.. ![]() |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
I_am_Tosk wrote:
And the way it should be.. If there was a union in the service those "underperformers" would be handed a broom and a raise and be allowed to work until retirement making more pay than the guys really doing the work.. ![]() This from a little man whose only real job in life was working as an unskilled laborer in a food warehouse. And he couldn't hang onto that job. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says... I_am_Tosk wrote: And the way it should be.. If there was a union in the service those "underperformers" would be handed a broom and a raise and be allowed to work until retirement making more pay than the guys really doing the work.. ![]() This from a little man whose only real job in life was working as an unskilled laborer in a food warehouse. And he couldn't hang onto that job. And as usual, Harry has no intelligent rebuttal, so he calls names and insults. Gee, I'll be no one seen THAT coming! |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says... I_am_Tosk wrote: And the way it should be.. If there was a union in the service those "underperformers" would be handed a broom and a raise and be allowed to work until retirement making more pay than the guys really doing the work.. ![]() This from a little man whose only real job in life was working as an unskilled laborer in a food warehouse. And he couldn't hang onto that job. You make this **** up as you go along. You are one creepy old man for sure.. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Impeach em all! | General | |||
| Free Obama/Biden Bumper Sticker!! | General | |||
| Interesting analysis .... Obama/Biden | General | |||
| For pure love of Obama and Biden... | General | |||
| Oh No! They Are Going to Impeach Bush! | General | |||