| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
An OT question
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:26:23 -0700, wrote: On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:50:32 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 23:16:28 -0700, wrote: On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 01:42:10 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 22:06:50 -0700, wrote: On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:25:41 -0400, wrote: As distasteful as it is, those wackos apparently have the right to protest. At a certain point the reach the level of "fire in a crowded theater". The Supreme Court spoke on this subject. They have the right to do it. As I said, bikers have become sissies. I would expect Rolling Thunder to explain they also have the right to get their ass kicked if they don't take their protest down the road. They don't have such a right. That's a threat. Duh ... BIKERS. They are supposed to be a little threatening. LOL Well, some are some aren't I guess. Less the "Wild One" and more like the "Wild Hogs". I do wonder how this plays in a "fighting words" state where it is determined that some speech is egregious enough to justify assault. Connecticut and Georgia? Snotty Ingersoll* at several points threatened to show up here and teach me a lesson, and so did the Loogy moron. * It is embarrassing to me that Ingersoll lives in the state of my birth. I no longer can claim that Connecticut Yankees are smarter than the average bear since, with Ingersoll posting here, that obviously is not true. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
An OT question
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 15:31:53 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:26:23 -0700, wrote: On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:50:32 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 23:16:28 -0700, wrote: On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 01:42:10 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 22:06:50 -0700, wrote: On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:25:41 -0400, wrote: As distasteful as it is, those wackos apparently have the right to protest. At a certain point the reach the level of "fire in a crowded theater". The Supreme Court spoke on this subject. They have the right to do it. As I said, bikers have become sissies. I would expect Rolling Thunder to explain they also have the right to get their ass kicked if they don't take their protest down the road. They don't have such a right. That's a threat. Duh ... BIKERS. They are supposed to be a little threatening. LOL Well, some are some aren't I guess. Less the "Wild One" and more like the "Wild Hogs". I do wonder how this plays in a "fighting words" state where it is determined that some speech is egregious enough to justify assault. It depends a lot on the presiding authority. Different places define them differently. Basically, it's when they're used to incite violence or express hatred by the person to whom they're directed, but that's very broad. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
An OT question
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:06:51 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:13:00 -0700, wrote: On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 15:31:53 -0400, wrote: I do wonder how this plays in a "fighting words" state where it is determined that some speech is egregious enough to justify assault. It depends a lot on the presiding authority. Different places define them differently. Basically, it's when they're used to incite violence or express hatred by the person to whom they're directed, but that's very broad. I think standing next to a funeral telling some family that their son died because god killed him for supporting fags is "inciting violence". I agree, but the Supreme's disagreed. It was one of the few times that I actually agreed with Alito. They decided that it was a public statement vs. one to specific person. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
An OT question
In article ,
says... On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:13:00 -0700, wrote: On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 15:31:53 -0400, wrote: I do wonder how this plays in a "fighting words" state where it is determined that some speech is egregious enough to justify assault. It depends a lot on the presiding authority. Different places define them differently. Basically, it's when they're used to incite violence or express hatred by the person to whom they're directed, but that's very broad. I think standing next to a funeral telling some family that their son died because god killed him for supporting fags is "inciting violence". A few thugs in masks should pop out of a crowd and give a few of them hideous beat downs and disappear back into the crowd.. A couple incidents like that and the cowards would go find something else to do to try to impress each other... That is when they got out of the hospital. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Refinish Deck Question , for sailboat ,, for spring ,, Paint question | Boat Building | |||
| Deck delamination, purchase question, how to do the deal .. question | Boat Building | |||
| Newbie Question: 40' Performance Cruiser question (including powerplant) | Cruising | |||
| Seamanship Question 2 pts plus bonus question. | ASA | |||
Hybrid Mode
