On Mar 13, 7:32*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 18:21:14 -0400, Ernie wrote:
On 3/13/2011 6:06 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 17:03:25 -0400, *wrote:

On 3/13/2011 4:50 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:21:05 -0500, Wayne.B
* wrote:

On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:38:57 -0800, wrote:

In good economic times, I would agree that projects should "stand on
their own" financially and without gov't backing. But these are not
good times, and it seems to me that most anything that creates or
preserves jobs right now is better than continued unemployment and all
the attendant consequences.

Building unneeded/unwanted infrastructure with public funds is not
good policy, good times or bad. * There are plenty of worthwhile
projects that need funding.

All of which are opposed by Republicans, unless it's in their
district. Then, they're opposed to it before they're for it.

Yeah, yeah, yeah... Righties, righties, righties.. But you don't have an
idea of your own...

She took a colon cleanse and that's what came out.

Looks like you have a lot of experience with what comes out.

GFY

Poor baby... you can dish it but you can't take it. Typical little
boy.

And who is this "poor baby" who can dish it out but can't take it?



On Mar 13, 7:32 pm, wrote:


Poor baby... you can dish it but you can't take it. Typical little
boy.

From:
Date: Dec 15 2010, 2:56 am
Subject: Rare Native American canoe discovered in Cornwall
To: rec.boats

On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:12:16 -0800 (PST),TopBassDog
You may wish to try civility in your due courses, D'Plume. It travels
so much further in a debate than calling people liars with no founded
precedence.

Your insults are nothing new. You're a lowlife. Sorry I bothered.

Oh, and go **** yourself... have a field day with that.

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 01:47:16 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:05:43 -0700, wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:46:09 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:55:44 -0700, wrote:

On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:21:05 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:38:57 -0800, wrote:

In good economic times, I would agree that projects should "stand on
their own" financially and without gov't backing. But these are not
good times, and it seems to me that most anything that creates or
preserves jobs right now is better than continued unemployment and all
the attendant consequences.

Building unneeded/unwanted infrastructure with public funds is not
good policy, good times or bad. There are plenty of worthwhile
projects that need funding.

All of which are opposed by Republicans, unless it's in their
district. Then, they're opposed to it before they're for it.

The pork barrel is no stranger to either side of the aisle. Just as
an FYI, I do no consider myself to be a Republican or a Democrat.
They have both become way too polarized and polarizing for my taste.
We need someone who can pull the country back together and I don't see
much of that on the horizon.

So how are you and Wilbur getting on?

FYI, you're the one who claimed that there are "worthwhile" projects.
All of them have been opposed by Republicans as I said.


Which projects were opposed? I think you are just making things up
now.

Next time do your own Google search instead of relying on Faux News.

http://thinkprogress.org/2011/02/09/...d-republicans/
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=aPeLiub0jnQE
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_468089.html
http://www.wusf.usf.edu/news/2010/10..._ask_for_money

And it goes on and on.

On Mar 14, 2:11*am, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 01:47:16 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:05:43 -0700, wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:46:09 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:55:44 -0700, wrote:

On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:21:05 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:38:57 -0800, wrote:

In good economic times, I would agree that projects should "stand on
their own" financially and without gov't backing. But these are not
good times, and it seems to me that most anything that creates or
preserves jobs right now is better than continued unemployment and all
the attendant consequences.

Building unneeded/unwanted infrastructure with public funds is not
good policy, good times or bad. * There are plenty of worthwhile
projects that need funding.

All of which are opposed by Republicans, unless it's in their
district. Then, they're opposed to it before they're for it.

The pork barrel is no stranger to either side of the aisle. *Just as
an FYI, I do no consider myself to be a Republican or a Democrat.
They have both become way too polarized and polarizing for my taste.
We need someone who can pull the country back together and I don't see
much of that on the horizon.

So how are you and Wilbur getting on?

FYI, you're the one who claimed that there are "worthwhile" projects.
All of them have been opposed by Republicans as I said.

Which projects were opposed? I think you are just making things up
now.

Next time do your own Google search instead of relying on Faux News.

http://thinkprogress.org/2011/02/09/..._criticize_sti...

And it goes on and on.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Think Progress, Huffington Hoax? Pfffft. and you call Fox, Faux??

On 3/14/2011 2:11 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 01:47:16 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:05:43 -0700, wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:46:09 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:55:44 -0700, wrote:

On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:21:05 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:38:57 -0800, wrote:

In good economic times, I would agree that projects should "stand on
their own" financially and without gov't backing. But these are not
good times, and it seems to me that most anything that creates or
preserves jobs right now is better than continued unemployment and all
the attendant consequences.

Building unneeded/unwanted infrastructure with public funds is not
good policy, good times or bad. There are plenty of worthwhile
projects that need funding.

All of which are opposed by Republicans, unless it's in their
district. Then, they're opposed to it before they're for it.

The pork barrel is no stranger to either side of the aisle. Just as
an FYI, I do no consider myself to be a Republican or a Democrat.
They have both become way too polarized and polarizing for my taste.
We need someone who can pull the country back together and I don't see
much of that on the horizon.

So how are you and Wilbur getting on?

FYI, you're the one who claimed that there are "worthwhile" projects.
All of them have been opposed by Republicans as I said.


Which projects were opposed? I think you are just making things up
now.

Next time do your own Google search instead of relying on Faux News.

http://thinkprogress.org/2011/02/09/...d-republicans/
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=aPeLiub0jnQE
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_468089.html
http://www.wusf.usf.edu/news/2010/10..._ask_for_money

And it goes on and on.

Fair and balanced reporting? What a moron you are.

On 3/14/11 7:05 AM, Ernie wrote:
On 3/14/2011 2:11 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 01:47:16 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:05:43 -0700, wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:46:09 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:55:44 -0700, wrote:

On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:21:05 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:38:57 -0800, wrote:

In good economic times, I would agree that projects should
"stand on
their own" financially and without gov't backing. But these are not
good times, and it seems to me that most anything that creates or
preserves jobs right now is better than continued unemployment
and all
the attendant consequences.

Building unneeded/unwanted infrastructure with public funds is not
good policy, good times or bad. There are plenty of worthwhile
projects that need funding.

All of which are opposed by Republicans, unless it's in their
district. Then, they're opposed to it before they're for it.

The pork barrel is no stranger to either side of the aisle. Just as
an FYI, I do no consider myself to be a Republican or a Democrat.
They have both become way too polarized and polarizing for my taste.
We need someone who can pull the country back together and I don't see
much of that on the horizon.

So how are you and Wilbur getting on?

FYI, you're the one who claimed that there are "worthwhile" projects.
All of them have been opposed by Republicans as I said.


Which projects were opposed? I think you are just making things up
now.

Next time do your own Google search instead of relying on Faux News.

http://thinkprogress.org/2011/02/09/...d-republicans/
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=aPeLiub0jnQE
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_468089.html

http://www.wusf.usf.edu/news/2010/10..._ask_for_money


And it goes on and on.

Fair and balanced reporting? What a moron you are.


The old Soviet "Pravda" was more fair and balanced than Fox. Fox is the
made-up news source of angry white men, teabaggers, racists, and the
seriously mis-educated. It's a right-wing propaganda outlet,
spoonfeeding its millions of discontented white viewers a steady diet of
absolutely made-up bull****. Scott Ingersoll here is a perfect example
of a Fox News viewer. His political and news posts are nothing more than
regurgitated Fox News vomitus, and it is apparent he actually believes
the b.s. he's being sold.

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...



More spew from Harry Krause, of 2015 Rosedale Lane
Huntington Maryland.. Phone410-535-1594 or 202-365-0164

Harry Krause is a dangerous man if you have children, even his own
children abandoned him to protect their babies from his sick pedophile
fantasies. Harry Krause thinks it's perfectly ok for a old man like
himself to rape your little baby as young as 10 years old and spirit her
off over state lines to hide the crime from the parents of authorities.
He also thinks it's ok to shoot anybody who comes on his property
"including police officers".. if they are not clearly announced.. This
is a sick man who is stalking me, hopefully if you live close to him,
you will watch your own children....

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:24:04 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 23:11:20 -0700, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 01:47:16 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:05:43 -0700, wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:46:09 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:55:44 -0700, wrote:

On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:21:05 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:38:57 -0800, wrote:

In good economic times, I would agree that projects should "stand on
their own" financially and without gov't backing. But these are not
good times, and it seems to me that most anything that creates or
preserves jobs right now is better than continued unemployment and all
the attendant consequences.

Building unneeded/unwanted infrastructure with public funds is not
good policy, good times or bad. There are plenty of worthwhile
projects that need funding.

All of which are opposed by Republicans, unless it's in their
district. Then, they're opposed to it before they're for it.

The pork barrel is no stranger to either side of the aisle. Just as
an FYI, I do no consider myself to be a Republican or a Democrat.
They have both become way too polarized and polarizing for my taste.
We need someone who can pull the country back together and I don't see
much of that on the horizon.

So how are you and Wilbur getting on?

FYI, you're the one who claimed that there are "worthwhile" projects.
All of them have been opposed by Republicans as I said.


Which projects were opposed? I think you are just making things up
now.

Next time do your own Google search instead of relying on Faux News.

http://thinkprogress.org/2011/02/09/...d-republicans/
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=aPeLiub0jnQE
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_468089.html
http://www.wusf.usf.edu/news/2010/10..._ask_for_money

And it goes on and on.


We were talking about Florida

Didn't even read them did you. Try again!

http://www.wusf.usf.edu/news/2010/10..._ask_for_money

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:47:46 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:39:57 -0700, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:24:04 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 23:11:20 -0700, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 01:47:16 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:05:43 -0700, wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:46:09 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:55:44 -0700, wrote:

On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 09:21:05 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:38:57 -0800, wrote:

In good economic times, I would agree that projects should "stand on
their own" financially and without gov't backing. But these are not
good times, and it seems to me that most anything that creates or
preserves jobs right now is better than continued unemployment and all
the attendant consequences.

Building unneeded/unwanted infrastructure with public funds is not
good policy, good times or bad. There are plenty of worthwhile
projects that need funding.

All of which are opposed by Republicans, unless it's in their
district. Then, they're opposed to it before they're for it.

The pork barrel is no stranger to either side of the aisle. Just as
an FYI, I do no consider myself to be a Republican or a Democrat.
They have both become way too polarized and polarizing for my taste.
We need someone who can pull the country back together and I don't see
much of that on the horizon.

So how are you and Wilbur getting on?

FYI, you're the one who claimed that there are "worthwhile" projects.
All of them have been opposed by Republicans as I said.


Which projects were opposed? I think you are just making things up
now.

Next time do your own Google search instead of relying on Faux News.

http://thinkprogress.org/2011/02/09/...d-republicans/
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...d=aPeLiub0jnQE
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_468089.html
http://www.wusf.usf.edu/news/2010/10..._ask_for_money

And it goes on and on.


We were talking about Florida

Didn't even read them did you. Try again!

http://www.wusf.usf.edu/news/2010/10..._ask_for_money


When you front end load you list of Google hits with off topic
articles I am not going to read them all.

The last one said what I have been saying We like stimulus money that
does things people want like road improvements. It was that train
boondoggle we rejected.

Didn't realize bloomberg was off topic.

"Republicans Voting Against Stimulus Then Asked Obama for Money"

Sorry if you're having comprehension problems.

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:28:49 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:01:08 -0700, wrote:


Didn't realize bloomberg was off topic.

"Republicans Voting Against Stimulus Then Asked Obama for Money"

Sorry if you're having comprehension problems.

This topic is about one train in Florida, you are the one who is
trying to make it about something else you want to argue about.

You are the one who apparently doesn't match the news. The Republicans
have blocked just about every stim package they could find, then had
their hands out for the money. Feel free to live in a reality-free
zone.

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:28:40 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:40:38 -0700, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 21:28:49 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:01:08 -0700, wrote:


Didn't realize bloomberg was off topic.

"Republicans Voting Against Stimulus Then Asked Obama for Money"

Sorry if you're having comprehension problems.

This topic is about one train in Florida, you are the one who is
trying to make it about something else you want to argue about.

You are the one who apparently doesn't match the news. The Republicans
have blocked just about every stim package they could find, then had
their hands out for the money. Feel free to live in a reality-free
zone.

Having absolutely nothing to do with this conversation.
We are talking about one particular boondoggle not some generalized
hatred for the GOP that you harbor and want to argue about.

Even if I did want to comment on your links I would point out this is
not a case of a GOP legislator fighting "stim" legislation and then
taking the money. Scott does not want the money so your links are off
topic or you do not understand what you are posting.

I have no hatred for the GOP, but you seem to have some for anything
liberal.

As I said, all (or nearly all) Republicans voted against the stim, and
most of them then put their hand out to want some of it after it
passed.

Scott is a, apparently, a criminal. Feel free to defend him.