On Mar 7, 9:32*am, HenryK wrote:
On 3/7/2011 12:00 AM, *e#c wrote:









On Mar 6, 10:33 pm, *wrote:
just got back from a weekend visiting my son and his family in
Tennessee. Took the wife's, 2009 Honda CRV and it did the job
flawlessly. I would have liked to taken the '95 town car because the
ride and comfort is unsurpassed compared to the Honda, though the
mileage *would have been about 5 mpg less. But the main reason i
wanted to take the Lincoln was because of it's age, mileage means
nothing to it. But the wife wanted to take the Honda, so .... i just
hate to rack miles up on something that might make a difference on
trade in. BUT! We bought the car to drive and not to look at besides,
being a small SUV it sits higher and it's easier for her to get in and
out of, unlike a low slung car. *Unless gas shoots up over $4.00 buck$
a gallon, next time the Lincoln will roll.

The Honda is nice, but the Lincoln rules. *Man, I love that car!

So, according to your buddies in here, you drive a " chic car ".

Try to read for content, pea brain. The "chic car" is his wife's daily
driver. Yes, he drove it on that occasion to keep peace in the family.
So, why are you picking on Tim, anyway?

Just using the other trolls own words. Is that a problem? Oh wait....
it's only a problem when someone ELSE uses the term. I see.