|
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
just got back from a weekend visiting my son and his family in
Tennessee. Took the wife's, 2009 Honda CRV and it did the job flawlessly. I would have liked to taken the '95 town car because the ride and comfort is unsurpassed compared to the Honda, though the mileage would have been about 5 mpg less. But the main reason i wanted to take the Lincoln was because of it's age, mileage means nothing to it. But the wife wanted to take the Honda, so .... i just hate to rack miles up on something that might make a difference on trade in. BUT! We bought the car to drive and not to look at besides, being a small SUV it sits higher and it's easier for her to get in and out of, unlike a low slung car. Unless gas shoots up over $4.00 buck$ a gallon, next time the Lincoln will roll. The Honda is nice, but the Lincoln rules. Man, I love that car! |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Mar 6, 10:33*pm, Tim wrote:
just got back from a weekend visiting my son and his family in Tennessee. Took the wife's, 2009 Honda CRV and it did the job flawlessly. I would have liked to taken the '95 town car because the ride and comfort is unsurpassed compared to the Honda, though the mileage *would have been about 5 mpg less. But the main reason i wanted to take the Lincoln was because of it's age, mileage means nothing to it. But the wife wanted to take the Honda, so .... i just hate to rack miles up on something that might make a difference on trade in. BUT! We bought the car to drive and not to look at besides, being a small SUV it sits higher and it's easier for her to get in and out of, unlike a low slung car. *Unless gas shoots up over $4.00 buck$ a gallon, next time the Lincoln will roll. The Honda is nice, but the Lincoln rules. *Man, I love that car! So, according to your buddies in here, you drive a " chic car ". |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Mar 7, 12:00*am, "*e#c" wrote:
On Mar 6, 10:33*pm, Tim wrote: just got back from a weekend visiting my son and his family in Tennessee. Took the wife's, 2009 Honda CRV and it did the job flawlessly. I would have liked to taken the '95 town car because the ride and comfort is unsurpassed compared to the Honda, though the mileage *would have been about 5 mpg less. But the main reason i wanted to take the Lincoln was because of it's age, mileage means nothing to it. But the wife wanted to take the Honda, so .... i just hate to rack miles up on something that might make a difference on trade in. BUT! We bought the car to drive and not to look at besides, being a small SUV it sits higher and it's easier for her to get in and out of, unlike a low slung car. *Unless gas shoots up over $4.00 buck$ a gallon, next time the Lincoln will roll. The Honda is nice, but the Lincoln rules. *Man, I love that car! So, according to your buddies in here, you drive a " chic car ". Uh, maybe you and Donny missed something. He said it's his wife's car. That would seem to indicate it belongs to a chick. Cute one, too! |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On 3/7/2011 12:00 AM, *e#c wrote:
On Mar 6, 10:33 pm, wrote: just got back from a weekend visiting my son and his family in Tennessee. Took the wife's, 2009 Honda CRV and it did the job flawlessly. I would have liked to taken the '95 town car because the ride and comfort is unsurpassed compared to the Honda, though the mileage would have been about 5 mpg less. But the main reason i wanted to take the Lincoln was because of it's age, mileage means nothing to it. But the wife wanted to take the Honda, so .... i just hate to rack miles up on something that might make a difference on trade in. BUT! We bought the car to drive and not to look at besides, being a small SUV it sits higher and it's easier for her to get in and out of, unlike a low slung car. Unless gas shoots up over $4.00 buck$ a gallon, next time the Lincoln will roll. The Honda is nice, but the Lincoln rules. Man, I love that car! So, according to your buddies in here, you drive a " chic car ". Try to read for content, pea brain. The "chic car" is his wife's daily driver. Yes, he drove it on that occasion to keep peace in the family. So, why are you picking on Tim, anyway? |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Mar 6, 10:33*pm, Tim wrote:
just got back from a weekend visiting my son and his family in Tennessee. Took the wife's, 2009 Honda CRV and it did the job flawlessly. I would have liked to taken the '95 town car because the ride and comfort is unsurpassed compared to the Honda, though the mileage *would have been about 5 mpg less. But the main reason i wanted to take the Lincoln was because of it's age, mileage means nothing to it. But the wife wanted to take the Honda, so .... i just hate to rack miles up on something that might make a difference on trade in. BUT! We bought the car to drive and not to look at besides, being a small SUV it sits higher and it's easier for her to get in and out of, unlike a low slung car. *Unless gas shoots up over $4.00 buck$ a gallon, next time the Lincoln will roll. The Honda is nice, but the Lincoln rules. *Man, I love that car! I tried to talk my wife into a CRV or a RAV4, but she wanted something bigger. So she got the Highlander. I think either the CRV or RAV4 would be great cars for a wife. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
|
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
|
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On 3/7/2011 9:31 AM, John H wrote:
On Mar 7, 12:00 am, wrote: On Mar 6, 10:33 pm, wrote: just got back from a weekend visiting my son and his family in Tennessee. Took the wife's, 2009 Honda CRV and it did the job flawlessly. I would have liked to taken the '95 town car because the ride and comfort is unsurpassed compared to the Honda, though the mileage would have been about 5 mpg less. But the main reason i wanted to take the Lincoln was because of it's age, mileage means nothing to it. But the wife wanted to take the Honda, so .... i just hate to rack miles up on something that might make a difference on trade in. BUT! We bought the car to drive and not to look at besides, being a small SUV it sits higher and it's easier for her to get in and out of, unlike a low slung car. Unless gas shoots up over $4.00 buck$ a gallon, next time the Lincoln will roll. The Honda is nice, but the Lincoln rules. Man, I love that car! So, according to your buddies in here, you drive a " chic car ". Uh, maybe you and Donny missed something. He said it's his wife's car. That would seem to indicate it belongs to a chick. Cute one, too! I don't know where Donny ever got the notion that The Rav 4 is anything but a chick car. The Rav 4 he claims as his is Donny's wife's car. He really doesn't need a car since he lives in the big city and the senior bus takes him anywhere he needs to go. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Mar 7, 9:32*am, HenryK wrote:
On 3/7/2011 12:00 AM, *e#c wrote: On Mar 6, 10:33 pm, *wrote: just got back from a weekend visiting my son and his family in Tennessee. Took the wife's, 2009 Honda CRV and it did the job flawlessly. I would have liked to taken the '95 town car because the ride and comfort is unsurpassed compared to the Honda, though the mileage *would have been about 5 mpg less. But the main reason i wanted to take the Lincoln was because of it's age, mileage means nothing to it. But the wife wanted to take the Honda, so .... i just hate to rack miles up on something that might make a difference on trade in. BUT! We bought the car to drive and not to look at besides, being a small SUV it sits higher and it's easier for her to get in and out of, unlike a low slung car. *Unless gas shoots up over $4.00 buck$ a gallon, next time the Lincoln will roll. The Honda is nice, but the Lincoln rules. *Man, I love that car! So, according to your buddies in here, you drive a " chic car ". Try to read for content, pea brain. The "chic car" is his wife's daily driver. Yes, he drove it on that occasion to keep peace in the family. So, why are you picking on Tim, anyway? Just using the other trolls own words. Is that a problem? Oh wait.... it's only a problem when someone ELSE uses the term. I see. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Mar 7, 9:31*am, John H wrote:
On Mar 7, 12:00*am, "*e#c" wrote: On Mar 6, 10:33*pm, Tim wrote: just got back from a weekend visiting my son and his family in Tennessee. Took the wife's, 2009 Honda CRV and it did the job flawlessly. I would have liked to taken the '95 town car because the ride and comfort is unsurpassed compared to the Honda, though the mileage *would have been about 5 mpg less. But the main reason i wanted to take the Lincoln was because of it's age, mileage means nothing to it. But the wife wanted to take the Honda, so .... i just hate to rack miles up on something that might make a difference on trade in. BUT! We bought the car to drive and not to look at besides, being a small SUV it sits higher and it's easier for her to get in and out of, unlike a low slung car. *Unless gas shoots up over $4.00 buck$ a gallon, next time the Lincoln will roll. The Honda is nice, but the Lincoln rules. *Man, I love that car! So, according to your buddies in here, you drive a " chic car ". Uh, maybe you and Donny missed something. He said it's his wife's car. That would seem to indicate it belongs to a chick. Cute one, too! I think you, and the other anonymous trolls missed something. He drives a " chic car". Plain and simple. It doesn't matter if it's HIS car, or his Wifes car. He still DRIVES it. I'll repeat the sentence so your neanderthal brain can absorb it... " So, according to your buddies on here, you drive a " chic car". You ****ers are really dense, huh? You bunch are also really easy to rile. Better take your meds, and have a nap. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com