|
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
just got back from a weekend visiting my son and his family in
Tennessee. Took the wife's, 2009 Honda CRV and it did the job flawlessly. I would have liked to taken the '95 town car because the ride and comfort is unsurpassed compared to the Honda, though the mileage would have been about 5 mpg less. But the main reason i wanted to take the Lincoln was because of it's age, mileage means nothing to it. But the wife wanted to take the Honda, so .... i just hate to rack miles up on something that might make a difference on trade in. BUT! We bought the car to drive and not to look at besides, being a small SUV it sits higher and it's easier for her to get in and out of, unlike a low slung car. Unless gas shoots up over $4.00 buck$ a gallon, next time the Lincoln will roll. The Honda is nice, but the Lincoln rules. Man, I love that car! |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Mar 6, 10:33*pm, Tim wrote:
just got back from a weekend visiting my son and his family in Tennessee. Took the wife's, 2009 Honda CRV and it did the job flawlessly. I would have liked to taken the '95 town car because the ride and comfort is unsurpassed compared to the Honda, though the mileage *would have been about 5 mpg less. But the main reason i wanted to take the Lincoln was because of it's age, mileage means nothing to it. But the wife wanted to take the Honda, so .... i just hate to rack miles up on something that might make a difference on trade in. BUT! We bought the car to drive and not to look at besides, being a small SUV it sits higher and it's easier for her to get in and out of, unlike a low slung car. *Unless gas shoots up over $4.00 buck$ a gallon, next time the Lincoln will roll. The Honda is nice, but the Lincoln rules. *Man, I love that car! So, according to your buddies in here, you drive a " chic car ". |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Mar 7, 12:00*am, "*e#c" wrote:
On Mar 6, 10:33*pm, Tim wrote: just got back from a weekend visiting my son and his family in Tennessee. Took the wife's, 2009 Honda CRV and it did the job flawlessly. I would have liked to taken the '95 town car because the ride and comfort is unsurpassed compared to the Honda, though the mileage *would have been about 5 mpg less. But the main reason i wanted to take the Lincoln was because of it's age, mileage means nothing to it. But the wife wanted to take the Honda, so .... i just hate to rack miles up on something that might make a difference on trade in. BUT! We bought the car to drive and not to look at besides, being a small SUV it sits higher and it's easier for her to get in and out of, unlike a low slung car. *Unless gas shoots up over $4.00 buck$ a gallon, next time the Lincoln will roll. The Honda is nice, but the Lincoln rules. *Man, I love that car! So, according to your buddies in here, you drive a " chic car ". Uh, maybe you and Donny missed something. He said it's his wife's car. That would seem to indicate it belongs to a chick. Cute one, too! |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On 3/7/2011 12:00 AM, *e#c wrote:
On Mar 6, 10:33 pm, wrote: just got back from a weekend visiting my son and his family in Tennessee. Took the wife's, 2009 Honda CRV and it did the job flawlessly. I would have liked to taken the '95 town car because the ride and comfort is unsurpassed compared to the Honda, though the mileage would have been about 5 mpg less. But the main reason i wanted to take the Lincoln was because of it's age, mileage means nothing to it. But the wife wanted to take the Honda, so .... i just hate to rack miles up on something that might make a difference on trade in. BUT! We bought the car to drive and not to look at besides, being a small SUV it sits higher and it's easier for her to get in and out of, unlike a low slung car. Unless gas shoots up over $4.00 buck$ a gallon, next time the Lincoln will roll. The Honda is nice, but the Lincoln rules. Man, I love that car! So, according to your buddies in here, you drive a " chic car ". Try to read for content, pea brain. The "chic car" is his wife's daily driver. Yes, he drove it on that occasion to keep peace in the family. So, why are you picking on Tim, anyway? |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Mar 6, 10:33*pm, Tim wrote:
just got back from a weekend visiting my son and his family in Tennessee. Took the wife's, 2009 Honda CRV and it did the job flawlessly. I would have liked to taken the '95 town car because the ride and comfort is unsurpassed compared to the Honda, though the mileage *would have been about 5 mpg less. But the main reason i wanted to take the Lincoln was because of it's age, mileage means nothing to it. But the wife wanted to take the Honda, so .... i just hate to rack miles up on something that might make a difference on trade in. BUT! We bought the car to drive and not to look at besides, being a small SUV it sits higher and it's easier for her to get in and out of, unlike a low slung car. *Unless gas shoots up over $4.00 buck$ a gallon, next time the Lincoln will roll. The Honda is nice, but the Lincoln rules. *Man, I love that car! I tried to talk my wife into a CRV or a RAV4, but she wanted something bigger. So she got the Highlander. I think either the CRV or RAV4 would be great cars for a wife. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
|
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
|
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On 3/7/2011 9:31 AM, John H wrote:
On Mar 7, 12:00 am, wrote: On Mar 6, 10:33 pm, wrote: just got back from a weekend visiting my son and his family in Tennessee. Took the wife's, 2009 Honda CRV and it did the job flawlessly. I would have liked to taken the '95 town car because the ride and comfort is unsurpassed compared to the Honda, though the mileage would have been about 5 mpg less. But the main reason i wanted to take the Lincoln was because of it's age, mileage means nothing to it. But the wife wanted to take the Honda, so .... i just hate to rack miles up on something that might make a difference on trade in. BUT! We bought the car to drive and not to look at besides, being a small SUV it sits higher and it's easier for her to get in and out of, unlike a low slung car. Unless gas shoots up over $4.00 buck$ a gallon, next time the Lincoln will roll. The Honda is nice, but the Lincoln rules. Man, I love that car! So, according to your buddies in here, you drive a " chic car ". Uh, maybe you and Donny missed something. He said it's his wife's car. That would seem to indicate it belongs to a chick. Cute one, too! I don't know where Donny ever got the notion that The Rav 4 is anything but a chick car. The Rav 4 he claims as his is Donny's wife's car. He really doesn't need a car since he lives in the big city and the senior bus takes him anywhere he needs to go. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Mar 7, 9:32*am, HenryK wrote:
On 3/7/2011 12:00 AM, *e#c wrote: On Mar 6, 10:33 pm, *wrote: just got back from a weekend visiting my son and his family in Tennessee. Took the wife's, 2009 Honda CRV and it did the job flawlessly. I would have liked to taken the '95 town car because the ride and comfort is unsurpassed compared to the Honda, though the mileage *would have been about 5 mpg less. But the main reason i wanted to take the Lincoln was because of it's age, mileage means nothing to it. But the wife wanted to take the Honda, so .... i just hate to rack miles up on something that might make a difference on trade in. BUT! We bought the car to drive and not to look at besides, being a small SUV it sits higher and it's easier for her to get in and out of, unlike a low slung car. *Unless gas shoots up over $4.00 buck$ a gallon, next time the Lincoln will roll. The Honda is nice, but the Lincoln rules. *Man, I love that car! So, according to your buddies in here, you drive a " chic car ". Try to read for content, pea brain. The "chic car" is his wife's daily driver. Yes, he drove it on that occasion to keep peace in the family. So, why are you picking on Tim, anyway? Just using the other trolls own words. Is that a problem? Oh wait.... it's only a problem when someone ELSE uses the term. I see. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Mar 7, 9:31*am, John H wrote:
On Mar 7, 12:00*am, "*e#c" wrote: On Mar 6, 10:33*pm, Tim wrote: just got back from a weekend visiting my son and his family in Tennessee. Took the wife's, 2009 Honda CRV and it did the job flawlessly. I would have liked to taken the '95 town car because the ride and comfort is unsurpassed compared to the Honda, though the mileage *would have been about 5 mpg less. But the main reason i wanted to take the Lincoln was because of it's age, mileage means nothing to it. But the wife wanted to take the Honda, so .... i just hate to rack miles up on something that might make a difference on trade in. BUT! We bought the car to drive and not to look at besides, being a small SUV it sits higher and it's easier for her to get in and out of, unlike a low slung car. *Unless gas shoots up over $4.00 buck$ a gallon, next time the Lincoln will roll. The Honda is nice, but the Lincoln rules. *Man, I love that car! So, according to your buddies in here, you drive a " chic car ". Uh, maybe you and Donny missed something. He said it's his wife's car. That would seem to indicate it belongs to a chick. Cute one, too! I think you, and the other anonymous trolls missed something. He drives a " chic car". Plain and simple. It doesn't matter if it's HIS car, or his Wifes car. He still DRIVES it. I'll repeat the sentence so your neanderthal brain can absorb it... " So, according to your buddies on here, you drive a " chic car". You ****ers are really dense, huh? You bunch are also really easy to rile. Better take your meds, and have a nap. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
I suppose the Honda CRV could be rather 'chic' if you want it to be.
And this is the first time I've really "driven" it for any distance farther than the three block trip to the gas station to refuel it, and that's because my wife loves to run the tank down to fumes. Otherwise I've never piloted the car more than 3 blocks at a time. Any other time Ive been in her Honda was while occupying the passenger side. With the exception of this trip, If I'm going to "drive" any real distance, further than the gas station, it's either in the Mercury wagon or the Lincoln. rarely do I accept any substitutes. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Mar 7, 6:26*pm, Tim wrote:
I suppose the Honda CRV could be rather 'chic' if you want it to be. And this is the first time I've really "driven" it for any distance farther than the three block trip to the gas station to refuel it, and that's because my wife loves to run the tank down to fumes. Otherwise I've never piloted the car more than 3 blocks at a time. Any other time Ive been in her Honda was while occupying the passenger side. With the exception of this trip, If I'm going to "drive" any real distance, further than the gas station, it's either in the Mercury wagon or the Lincoln. rarely do I accept any substitutes. Well, you see how Herring, and the other anonymous trolls react when their own words are slung back at them, huh? Herring is like one of those dogs you meet while out walking. No matter how many times you smack it in the head with a stick, it still comes back, stupidly wagging its tail. I think he learned that in Namm. But it could be his contamination from Agent Orange. It's a good thing he's been shelved by the Army....they wouldn't put up with his racism, and chauvinistic views. I'll bet he was on Latrine Duty exclusively in Namm. Maybe one of these weeks, Herring will actually make a " boating- related" post, instead of his usual puke. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 09:52:59 -0500, "paul@byc"
wrote: How's that high mileage Jeep vehicle you and your moron alter ego Loogy share, Loogy? Do you share wives and children, too? "Professor Paul", please give Harry a passing grade in his creative writing course so he can drop the sock puppet nonsense and get back to his "normal" self. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On 3/8/2011 11:29 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 09:52:59 -0500, wrote: How's that high mileage Jeep vehicle you and your moron alter ego Loogy share, Loogy? Do you share wives and children, too? "Professor Paul", please give Harry a passing grade in his creative writing course so he can drop the sock puppet nonsense and get back to his "normal" self. Just because I didn't see any need to "meet" you on your trip up here this summer is no reason for you to behave like an ass, Wayne. Your snarky behavior here is all the disincentive for a meeting that is needed. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:39:32 -0500, "paul@byc"
wrote: "Professor Paul", please give Harry a passing grade in his creative writing course so he can drop the sock puppet nonsense and get back to his "normal" self. Just because I didn't see any need to "meet" you on your trip up here this summer is no reason for you to behave like an ass, Wayne. Your snarky behavior here is all the disincentive for a meeting that is needed. A *real* creative writer would be careful not to copy the phrasing and style of the *real* author. Who do you think you are fooling Harold? Have the people at eternal-september.org been informed that you are violating their terms of service? |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On 3/8/11 1:28 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:39:32 -0500, wrote: "Professor Paul", please give Harry a passing grade in his creative writing course so he can drop the sock puppet nonsense and get back to his "normal" self. Just because I didn't see any need to "meet" you on your trip up here this summer is no reason for you to behave like an ass, Wayne. Your snarky behavior here is all the disincentive for a meeting that is needed. A *real* creative writer would be careful not to copy the phrasing and style of the *real* author. Who do you think you are fooling Harold? Have the people at eternal-september.org been informed that you are violating their terms of service? Sorry, W'hine. I'm not Paul and I'm not Harold. Are you Loogy or Scotty? You should be more careful and not copy their "phrasing and style." Or, should I say, lack of style. |
Hey, Paul...
W'hine, the great corporate apologist, thinks you are me or I am you.
I'm not sure which. You need to spend either more or less time here to develop a more distinctive style. Personally, I think it would be more fun to write as badly as loogy, snotty, bertie, canuck, et cetera. On 3/8/11 1:28 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:39:32 -0500, wrote: "Professor Paul", please give Harry a passing grade in his creative writing course so he can drop the sock puppet nonsense and get back to his "normal" self. Just because I didn't see any need to "meet" you on your trip up here this summer is no reason for you to behave like an ass, Wayne. Your snarky behavior here is all the disincentive for a meeting that is needed. A *real* creative writer would be careful not to copy the phrasing and style of the *real* author. Who do you think you are fooling Harold? Have the people at eternal-september.org been informed that you are violating their terms of service? |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
|
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says... On 3/8/11 1:28 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:39:32 -0500, wrote: "Professor Paul", please give Harry a passing grade in his creative writing course so he can drop the sock puppet nonsense and get back to his "normal" self. Just because I didn't see any need to "meet" you on your trip up here this summer is no reason for you to behave like an ass, Wayne. Your snarky behavior here is all the disincentive for a meeting that is needed. A *real* creative writer would be careful not to copy the phrasing and style of the *real* author. Who do you think you are fooling Harold? Have the people at eternal-september.org been informed that you are violating their terms of service? Sorry, W'hine. I'm not Paul and I'm not Harold. Are you Loogy or Scotty? You should be more careful and not copy their "phrasing and style." Or, should I say, lack of style. I thought I was loogy? |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 13:54:31 -0500, HarryisPaul wrote:
In article , payer3389 says... On 3/8/11 1:28 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:39:32 -0500, wrote: "Professor Paul", please give Harry a passing grade in his creative writing course so he can drop the sock puppet nonsense and get back to his "normal" self. Just because I didn't see any need to "meet" you on your trip up here this summer is no reason for you to behave like an ass, Wayne. Your snarky behavior here is all the disincentive for a meeting that is needed. A *real* creative writer would be careful not to copy the phrasing and style of the *real* author. Who do you think you are fooling Harold? Have the people at eternal-september.org been informed that you are violating their terms of service? Sorry, W'hine. I'm not Paul and I'm not Harold. Are you Loogy or Scotty? You should be more careful and not copy their "phrasing and style." Or, should I say, lack of style. I thought I was loogy? I thought I was Harry? |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Mar 9, 6:54*am, "paul@byc" wrote:
I wonder if that is what is behind the obvious hatred of those on the far right here for those who do not share their beliefs. That those of us who do not share your political beliefs, beliefs you believe are universal, make you nervous, at least subconsciously, and you strike out at us. Wow, I didn't know that voicing an opposing opinion showed a sign of hateful paranoia. Why don't you leave the 'striking ' to JPS and Frogwatch. Well that really couldnt' be fair, because Frog actually does put forth a boating post occasionally. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On 3/9/11 8:14 AM, Tim wrote:
On Mar 9, 6:54 am, wrote: I wonder if that is what is behind the obvious hatred of those on the far right here for those who do not share their beliefs. That those of us who do not share your political beliefs, beliefs you believe are universal, make you nervous, at least subconsciously, and you strike out at us. Wow, I didn't know that voicing an opposing opinion showed a sign of hateful paranoia. Why don't you leave the 'striking ' to JPS and Frogwatch. Well that really couldnt' be fair, because Frog actually does put forth a boating post occasionally. I'm not sure he meant paranoia, Tim-ster. Paranoia implies persecution, someone or something is "out to get you." I think Paul was referring to internalized demons, that is, "I believe in X. But he doesn't. Why doesn't he? It should be obvious. It is to me. But wait, if he doesn't believe it, maybe it is worth doubting. I'll compensate by trying to slam him to the mat." That sort of thinking. :) No threat from the outside, just inner doubts. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:37:24 -0500, Harryk wrote:
On 3/9/11 8:14 AM, Tim wrote: On Mar 9, 6:54 am, wrote: I wonder if that is what is behind the obvious hatred of those on the far right here for those who do not share their beliefs. That those of us who do not share your political beliefs, beliefs you believe are universal, make you nervous, at least subconsciously, and you strike out at us. Wow, I didn't know that voicing an opposing opinion showed a sign of hateful paranoia. Why don't you leave the 'striking ' to JPS and Frogwatch. Well that really couldnt' be fair, because Frog actually does put forth a boating post occasionally. I'm not sure he meant paranoia, Tim-ster. Paranoia implies persecution, someone or something is "out to get you." I think Paul was referring to internalized demons, that is, "I believe in X. But he doesn't. Why doesn't he? It should be obvious. It is to me. But wait, if he doesn't believe it, maybe it is worth doubting. I'll compensate by trying to slam him to the mat." That sort of thinking. :) No threat from the outside, just inner doubts. Tim is quite capable of his own thinking. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 05:14:41 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: On Mar 9, 6:54*am, "paul@byc" wrote: I wonder if that is what is behind the obvious hatred of those on the far right here for those who do not share their beliefs. That those of us who do not share your political beliefs, beliefs you believe are universal, make you nervous, at least subconsciously, and you strike out at us. Wow, I didn't know that voicing an opposing opinion showed a sign of hateful paranoia. Why don't you leave the 'striking ' to JPS and Frogwatch. Well that really couldnt' be fair, because Frog actually does put forth a boating post occasionally. Tim, I don't strike because other's thoughts make me nervous about my own beliefs. I strike because I don't suffer fools lightly and there are a gaggle of fools frequenting rec.boats. Most of them are in my bozo bin but I still occassionally see their comments. Most of these idiots supported Bush's wars, think Obama is a muslim, think liberals are out to destroy the country. They deserve a good thrashiing for their willful ignorance. I'm standing by to oblige. There are plenty here who I also disagree with but they're not prickly assholes flinging wild statements. I enjoy those exchanges because they can and have expanded my own thinking. And, as far as boats are concerned, there are many who have significantly more experience than I so most of my interest is in listening rather than spouting. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
|
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
|
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Mar 9, 12:02*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 05:14:41 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Mar 9, 6:54 am, "paul@byc" wrote: I wonder if that is what is behind the obvious hatred of those on the far right here for those who do not share their beliefs. That those of us who do not share your political beliefs, beliefs you believe are universal, make you nervous, at least subconsciously, and you strike out at us. Wow, I didn't know that voicing an opposing opinion showed a sign of hateful paranoia. Why don't you leave the 'striking ' to JPS and Frogwatch. Well that really couldnt' be fair, because Frog actually does put forth a boating post occasionally. Tim, I don't strike because other's thoughts make me nervous about my own beliefs. *I strike because I don't suffer fools lightly and there are a gaggle of fools frequenting rec.boats. *Most of them are in my bozo bin but I still occassionally see their comments. Most of these idiots supported Bush's wars, think Obama is a muslim, think liberals are out to destroy the country. *They deserve a good thrashiing for their willful ignorance. *I'm standing by to oblige. Ok, so... what is it that you deserve? There are plenty here who I also disagree with but they're not prickly assholes flinging wild statements. *I enjoy those exchanges because they can and have expanded my own thinking. And, as far as boats are concerned, there are many who have significantly more experience than I so most of my interest is in listening rather than spouting. Interesting, but a lot of those experienced boaters, are deemed as 'prickly a$$holes' by a few of your compatriots due to their opposing political opinions. isn't that criteria also balanced into your consideration? |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:33:54 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: On Mar 9, 12:02*pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 05:14:41 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Mar 9, 6:54 am, "paul@byc" wrote: I wonder if that is what is behind the obvious hatred of those on the far right here for those who do not share their beliefs. That those of us who do not share your political beliefs, beliefs you believe are universal, make you nervous, at least subconsciously, and you strike out at us. Wow, I didn't know that voicing an opposing opinion showed a sign of hateful paranoia. Why don't you leave the 'striking ' to JPS and Frogwatch. Well that really couldnt' be fair, because Frog actually does put forth a boating post occasionally. Tim, I don't strike because other's thoughts make me nervous about my own beliefs. *I strike because I don't suffer fools lightly and there are a gaggle of fools frequenting rec.boats. *Most of them are in my bozo bin but I still occassionally see their comments. Most of these idiots supported Bush's wars, think Obama is a muslim, think liberals are out to destroy the country. *They deserve a good thrashiing for their willful ignorance. *I'm standing by to oblige. Ok, so... what is it that you deserve? I'm open to learning but not from a pack of blowhard fools who subscribe to anything the likes of Sean Hannity or Glenn Beck preach. There are plenty here who I also disagree with but they're not prickly assholes flinging wild statements. *I enjoy those exchanges because they can and have expanded my own thinking. And, as far as boats are concerned, there are many who have significantly more experience than I so most of my interest is in listening rather than spouting. Interesting, but a lot of those experienced boaters, are deemed as 'prickly a$$holes' by a few of your compatriots due to their opposing political opinions. isn't that criteria also balanced into your consideration? Like I said, there are folks here who I disagree with on a fundamental level who I still respect for the way they carry themselves and I act accordingly. For those that deserve contempt for their willful ignorance and idiotic bluster, I've got barrels to share. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 18:27:23 -0500, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 05:14:41 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Mar 9, 6:54*am, "paul@byc" wrote: I wonder if that is what is behind the obvious hatred of those on the far right here for those who do not share their beliefs. That those of us who do not share your political beliefs, beliefs you believe are universal, make you nervous, at least subconsciously, and you strike out at us. Wow, I didn't know that voicing an opposing opinion showed a sign of hateful paranoia. Why don't you leave the 'striking ' to JPS and Frogwatch. Well that really couldnt' be fair, because Frog actually does put forth a boating post occasionally. Tim, I don't strike because other's thoughts make me nervous about my own beliefs. I strike because I don't suffer fools lightly and there are a gaggle of fools frequenting rec.boats. Most of them are in my bozo bin but I still occassionally see their comments. You don't have a bozo bin. Most of these idiots supported Bush's wars, think Obama is a muslim, think liberals are out to destroy the country. They deserve a good thrashiing for their willful ignorance. I'm standing by to oblige. The same wars that Obama has increased the troop levels. Decreased combat troops to zero in Iraq. Increase them in Afg. which is where they should have been to begin with. Is Gitmo closed? Did Bush authorize torture? That's the problem. Are the detainees at Gitmo being tried in Military Tribunals or Civilians courts? Soon to be yet again. There are plenty here who I also disagree with but they're not prickly assholes flinging wild statements. I enjoy those exchanges because they can and have expanded my own thinking. You suffer from from severe paranoia as Harry explained. You're delusional. And, as far as boats are concerned, there are many who have significantly more experience than I so most of my interest is in listening rather than spouting. Except when it comes to fine German screw drivers, which you are the expert. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Mar 8, 5:07*pm, wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 13:54:31 -0500, HarryisPaul wrote: In article , payer3389 says... On 3/8/11 1:28 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:39:32 -0500, wrote: "Professor Paul", please give Harry a passing grade in his creative writing course so he can drop the sock puppet nonsense and get back to his "normal" self. Just because I didn't see any need to "meet" you on your trip up here this summer is no reason for you to behave like an ass, Wayne. Your snarky behavior here is all the disincentive for a meeting that is needed. A *real* creative writer would be careful not to copy the phrasing and style of the *real* author. *Who do you think you are fooling Harold? Have the people at eternal-september.org been informed that you are violating their terms of service? Sorry, W'hine. I'm not Paul and I'm not Harold. Are you Loogy or Scotty? You should be more careful and not copy their "phrasing and style." Or, should I say, lack of style. I thought I was loogy? I thought I was Harry? You misspelled "hairy" D'Plume. Unless you were the recent recipient of a full body shave, then hairy you still are. |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Mar 9, 12:02*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 05:14:41 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Mar 9, 6:54 am, "paul@byc" wrote: I wonder if that is what is behind the obvious hatred of those on the far right here for those who do not share their beliefs. That those of us who do not share your political beliefs, beliefs you believe are universal, make you nervous, at least subconsciously, and you strike out at us. Wow, I didn't know that voicing an opposing opinion showed a sign of hateful paranoia. Why don't you leave the 'striking ' to JPS and Frogwatch. Well that really couldnt' be fair, because Frog actually does put forth a boating post occasionally. Tim, I don't strike because other's thoughts make me nervous about my own beliefs. *I strike because I don't suffer fools lightly and there are a gaggle of fools frequenting rec.boats. *Most of them are in my bozo bin but I still occassionally see their comments. Most of these idiots supported Bush's wars, think Obama is a muslim, think liberals are out to destroy the country. *They deserve a good thrashiing for their willful ignorance. *I'm standing by to oblige. So, by using D'Plume's logic, this makes you king of fools! |
678 miles, 26.2 mpg, and $3.39 fuel cost average.
On Mar 9, 8:09*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:33:54 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Mar 9, 12:02 pm, jps wrote: On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 05:14:41 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Mar 9, 6:54 am, "paul@byc" wrote: I wonder if that is what is behind the obvious hatred of those on the far right here for those who do not share their beliefs. That those of us who do not share your political beliefs, beliefs you believe are universal, make you nervous, at least subconsciously, and you strike out at us. Wow, I didn't know that voicing an opposing opinion showed a sign of hateful paranoia. Why don't you leave the 'striking ' to JPS and Frogwatch. Well that really couldnt' be fair, because Frog actually does put forth a boating post occasionally. Tim, I don't strike because other's thoughts make me nervous about my own beliefs. I strike because I don't suffer fools lightly and there are a gaggle of fools frequenting rec.boats. Most of them are in my bozo bin but I still occassionally see their comments. Most of these idiots supported Bush's wars, think Obama is a muslim, think liberals are out to destroy the country. They deserve a good thrashiing for their willful ignorance. I'm standing by to oblige. Ok, so... what is it that you deserve? I'm open to learning but not from a pack of blowhard fools who subscribe to anything the likes of Sean Hannity or Glenn Beck preach. There are plenty here who I also disagree with but they're not prickly assholes flinging wild statements. I enjoy those exchanges because they can and have expanded my own thinking. And, as far as boats are concerned, there are many who have significantly more experience than I so most of my interest is in listening rather than spouting. Interesting, but a lot of those experienced boaters, are deemed as 'prickly a$$holes' by a few of your compatriots due to *their opposing political opinions. isn't that criteria also balanced into your consideration? Like I said, there are folks here who I disagree with on a fundamental level who I still respect for the way they carry themselves and I act accordingly. *For those that deserve contempt for their willful ignorance and idiotic bluster, I've got barrels to share. So far, you have shown that you respect no one except, those who would stave by your ideology. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com