google the story

On 22/02/2011 9:14 AM, HarryK wrote:

google the story

Ya, and they should have just fed the fish with the 13 they caught.

Send out a training carrier. Park it right off Somalia. Drove some
fliers of in Mogadishu to whatever the hole is called. The message
should read, "If you are outside of the 25nm shore limit, we shoot
without notice.

Every few hours an Apache or tomcat takes off and shoots up anything
outside of the 25mn limit it can't identify as friendly.

When pirates cease coming home, they will cease pirating.

To get things on the roll, send in the Delta Force and Special Ops to
clean up and move the 35 shops or so in the ransom queue. If they are
not friendly, shoot.

I really think it is time to nail them hard.
--
Socialism is a great ideal as long as someone else pays for it. And when
no one is left to pay for it, they all can share nothing.

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500, HarryK
wrote:

google the story

i'm a ham radio operator. about 10 years ago i was on the 'maritme'
net when we got a call that a sailboat had been attacked by pirates
off the coast of honduras. a 17 year old boy had been shot. the
honduran navy does not go out at night so there was no relief until
the next day...very touch and go...

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500, HarryK
wrote:

google the story

If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.

They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.

On 2/22/2011 4:36 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500,
wrote:

google the story
If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.
They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.
They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.
Then what?Pirating is 100% of the Somali GNP.

On 22/02/2011 3:31 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 2/22/2011 4:36 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500,
wrote:

google the story
If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.
They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.
They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.
Then what?Pirating is 100% of the Somali GNP.

It isn't, dope is the other part.

--
Socialism is a great ideal as long as someone else pays for it. And when
no one is left to pay for it, they all can share nothing.

In article ,
says...

On 2/22/2011 4:36 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500,
wrote:

google the story
If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.
They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.
They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.
Then what?Pirating is 100% of the Somali GNP.

Then pirating will just be in South East Asian waters.

Pirates need to be dealt with swiftly and harshly regardless of their
location in the world.

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500, HarryK
wrote:

google the story

If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.

They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.

They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.

We need to recover the sailboat so we can tax it as an asset as it's
going from parents to children.

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:19:18 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500, HarryK
wrote:

google the story

If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.

They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.

They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.

We need to recover the sailboat so we can tax it as an asset as it's
going from parents to children.

LOL!

Very liberal of you!

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:24:56 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:36:23 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:19:18 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:36:17 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:46:03 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:04:06 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:14:09 -0500, HarryK
wrote:

google the story

If they killed all the hostages the answer is simple, sink the boat
and leave the survivors bobbing in the sea.

They're on a very nice sailboat owned by the dead hostage.

They no longer have need of it. The sailboat is a pirate ship now. Lob
a few 5" HE rounds into it from a couple miles away and come home.

If we really want to stop this crap we can.
Use aerial surveillance to profile the mother ships, monitor them from
over the horizon and when they start an attack, be there with air
power.. If you sink a few of these, the pirates may decide pirating is
not worth the risk.

We need to recover the sailboat so we can tax it as an asset as it's
going from parents to children.

LOL!

Very liberal of you!

Yeah, that is a cruel joke. Not only will we tax the kids for their
parent's boat, we also tax them to keep their parent's killers in
prison for 50 years or so.

What's needed is an anchor that can be transformed into a .50 cal. It is really
hard to believe that we're bringing those f**kers back here for a trial.