On 2/15/11 8:34 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:14:31 -0500, L wrote:

Harryk wrote:
On 2/13/11 2:38 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On 2/13/11 2:14 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleJKKdnX6iAb_GsMXQnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/13/11 2:10 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Maybe you should give credit when you plagiarize.

Harry's aversion to URLs is intended to hide the source of his
information.

Actually, Mr. IQ, I posted again on this subject, pointing out the
military's trashing of Aberdeen with yet another superfund site.
I did
include the URL there.

I assume the article was anti-miliatry and anti-business. It most
likely
fit your political goals.

Of course, neither you nor the other right-wing retard are
interested in
the URLs or the military's involvement in trashing the environment.
That's the real issue. not your deflection of it.

The military is run by civilians.

I remember reading and seeing many news items about that Navy
site in
Jax. It was adjacent to the river there, and a major polluter of
some
really horrific chemicals.

I see. Where does the I was just following orders excuse apply.


Telling the truth about military pollution is, naturally,
anti-military.
D'oh.

Where does the excuse, I was just following orders apply/

Probably every day during your entirely stateside stint with the
marines. It's not as if original thinking is a requirement, eh?

Just as I thought. You can't think past your biases.



Actually, I had a much higher opinion of the military until I
encountered you, Herring and flajim here. I've known a few retired
military guys in my lifetime and all of them seemed quite honorable to
me. I suppose the military lowered its standards significantly to let
you boys in, eh?


You really like that line, eh? Try for some originality next time.

It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et
al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my
opinion.

You are a racist. There is no valid rationale for your opinions.

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Just as I thought. You can't think past your biases.



Actually, I had a much higher opinion of the military until I
encountered you, Herring and flajim here. I've known a few retired
military guys in my lifetime and all of them seemed quite honorable to
me. I suppose the military lowered its standards significantly to let
you boys in, eh?


You really like that line, eh? Try for some originality next time.

It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et
al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my
opinion.

You are a racist. There is no valid rationale for your opinions.



The knee jerk liberal strikes again. If you don't agree with me your are
a racist response.

It is getting very tiresome to always hear the same thing coming from
you Harry.

Why don't you and Paul get together and come up with some new material.

On 2/16/11 8:29 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlewNGdnfz0EPsuocbQnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Just as I thought. You can't think past your biases.



Actually, I had a much higher opinion of the military until I
encountered you, Herring and flajim here. I've known a few retired
military guys in my lifetime and all of them seemed quite honorable to
me. I suppose the military lowered its standards significantly to let
you boys in, eh?


You really like that line, eh? Try for some originality next time.

It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et
al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my
opinion.

You are a racist. There is no valid rationale for your opinions.



The knee jerk liberal strikes again. If you don't agree with me your are
a racist response.

It is getting very tiresome to always hear the same thing coming from
you Harry.

Why don't you and Paul get together and come up with some new material.




You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist.

On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500, Harryk
wrote:

You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur

Logic police, please take note.

On 2/16/11 9:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500,
wrote:

You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur

Logic police, please take note.



D'oh. What do *you* think is behind the birthers, dip****? Hint: it is
Obama's skin color.

On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:20:59 -0500, Harryk
wrote:

On 2/16/11 9:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500,
wrote:

You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur

Logic police, please take note.


D'oh. What do *you* think is behind the birthers, dip****? Hint: it is
Obama's skin color.


There are quite a few people who legitimately don't care for him
regardless of race. That's what makes your statement a non sequitur
not to mention an ad hominem attack.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

Logic police, please take note.

On 2/16/11 9:58 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:20:59 -0500,
wrote:

On 2/16/11 9:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500,
wrote:

You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur

Logic police, please take note.


D'oh. What do *you* think is behind the birthers, dip****? Hint: it is
Obama's skin color.


There are quite a few people who legitimately don't care for him
regardless of race. That's what makes your statement a non sequitur
not to mention an ad hominem attack.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

Logic police, please take note.



You're talking about those who don't like Obama for reasons other than
race. Sure. Lots of those.

I'm talking about birthers. They don't like Obama because of his race.
Bertie is a birther.

On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:58:27 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:20:59 -0500, Harryk
wrote:

On 2/16/11 9:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500,
wrote:

You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur

Logic police, please take note.


D'oh. What do *you* think is behind the birthers, dip****? Hint: it is
Obama's skin color.


There are quite a few people who legitimately don't care for him
regardless of race. That's what makes your statement a non sequitur
not to mention an ad hominem attack.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

Logic police, please take note.

Yes, you're right .. there are quite a few people who don't like his
policies or even Obama as a person. That's not in question. The issue
is there are also a lot (many here) who are birthers and racists. They
aren't birthers because there's a legitimate question of his birth
place. They are birthers because they're racists and that's about all
they have to sustain them.

Harryk wrote:
On 2/16/11 9:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500,
wrote:

You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur

Logic police, please take note.



D'oh. What do *you* think is behind the birthers, dip****? Hint: it is
Obama's skin color.


He's half black. So what? That has nothing to do with his place of birth.

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/16/11 8:29 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlewNGdnfz0EPsuocbQnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Just as I thought. You can't think past your biases.



Actually, I had a much higher opinion of the military until I
encountered you, Herring and flajim here. I've known a few retired
military guys in my lifetime and all of them seemed quite honorable to
me. I suppose the military lowered its standards significantly to let
you boys in, eh?


You really like that line, eh? Try for some originality next time.

It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et
al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my
opinion.

You are a racist. There is no valid rationale for your opinions.



The knee jerk liberal strikes again. If you don't agree with me your are
a racist response.

It is getting very tiresome to always hear the same thing coming from
you Harry.

Why don't you and Paul get together and come up with some new material.




You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist.

You are a one trick pony.