|
Warning to rec.boats
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:14:31 -0500, L G wrote:
Harryk wrote: On 2/13/11 2:38 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 2/13/11 2:14 PM, BAR wrote: In articleJKKdnX6iAb_GsMXQnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... On 2/13/11 2:10 PM, BAR wrote: In , payer3389 @mypacks.net says... Maybe you should give credit when you plagiarize. Harry's aversion to URLs is intended to hide the source of his information. Actually, Mr. IQ, I posted again on this subject, pointing out the military's trashing of Aberdeen with yet another superfund site. I did include the URL there. I assume the article was anti-miliatry and anti-business. It most likely fit your political goals. Of course, neither you nor the other right-wing retard are interested in the URLs or the military's involvement in trashing the environment. That's the real issue. not your deflection of it. The military is run by civilians. I remember reading and seeing many news items about that Navy site in Jax. It was adjacent to the river there, and a major polluter of some really horrific chemicals. I see. Where does the I was just following orders excuse apply. Telling the truth about military pollution is, naturally, anti-military. D'oh. Where does the excuse, I was just following orders apply/ Probably every day during your entirely stateside stint with the marines. It's not as if original thinking is a requirement, eh? Just as I thought. You can't think past your biases. Actually, I had a much higher opinion of the military until I encountered you, Herring and flajim here. I've known a few retired military guys in my lifetime and all of them seemed quite honorable to me. I suppose the military lowered its standards significantly to let you boys in, eh? You really like that line, eh? Try for some originality next time. It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. |
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/15/11 8:34 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:14:31 -0500, L wrote: Harryk wrote: On 2/13/11 2:38 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 2/13/11 2:14 PM, BAR wrote: In articleJKKdnX6iAb_GsMXQnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... On 2/13/11 2:10 PM, BAR wrote: In , payer3389 @mypacks.net says... Maybe you should give credit when you plagiarize. Harry's aversion to URLs is intended to hide the source of his information. Actually, Mr. IQ, I posted again on this subject, pointing out the military's trashing of Aberdeen with yet another superfund site. I did include the URL there. I assume the article was anti-miliatry and anti-business. It most likely fit your political goals. Of course, neither you nor the other right-wing retard are interested in the URLs or the military's involvement in trashing the environment. That's the real issue. not your deflection of it. The military is run by civilians. I remember reading and seeing many news items about that Navy site in Jax. It was adjacent to the river there, and a major polluter of some really horrific chemicals. I see. Where does the I was just following orders excuse apply. Telling the truth about military pollution is, naturally, anti-military. D'oh. Where does the excuse, I was just following orders apply/ Probably every day during your entirely stateside stint with the marines. It's not as if original thinking is a requirement, eh? Just as I thought. You can't think past your biases. Actually, I had a much higher opinion of the military until I encountered you, Herring and flajim here. I've known a few retired military guys in my lifetime and all of them seemed quite honorable to me. I suppose the military lowered its standards significantly to let you boys in, eh? You really like that line, eh? Try for some originality next time. It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. You are a racist. There is no valid rationale for your opinions. |
Warning to rec.boats
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says... Just as I thought. You can't think past your biases. Actually, I had a much higher opinion of the military until I encountered you, Herring and flajim here. I've known a few retired military guys in my lifetime and all of them seemed quite honorable to me. I suppose the military lowered its standards significantly to let you boys in, eh? You really like that line, eh? Try for some originality next time. It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. You are a racist. There is no valid rationale for your opinions. The knee jerk liberal strikes again. If you don't agree with me your are a racist response. It is getting very tiresome to always hear the same thing coming from you Harry. Why don't you and Paul get together and come up with some new material. |
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/16/11 8:29 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlewNGdnfz0EPsuocbQnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... Just as I thought. You can't think past your biases. Actually, I had a much higher opinion of the military until I encountered you, Herring and flajim here. I've known a few retired military guys in my lifetime and all of them seemed quite honorable to me. I suppose the military lowered its standards significantly to let you boys in, eh? You really like that line, eh? Try for some originality next time. It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. You are a racist. There is no valid rationale for your opinions. The knee jerk liberal strikes again. If you don't agree with me your are a racist response. It is getting very tiresome to always hear the same thing coming from you Harry. Why don't you and Paul get together and come up with some new material. You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist. |
Warning to rec.boats
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John H
wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. |
Warning to rec.boats
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:47:11 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John H wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. You are correct. Actually, there are only a few here that I put in the same category as Harry - deplume and Donnie. Slammer, although a Harry follower, gets his own category. I'm supposing that he doesn't realize he really does need some help. Of course, most alcoholics have to hit there own 'bottom' before they seek help. Some hit there 'bottom' early, some don't. I find it best to ignore the great majority of his taunts, name-calling, and personal insults. |
Warning to rec.boats
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500, Harryk
wrote: You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur Logic police, please take note. |
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/16/11 8:47 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. The "free enterprise system" is out of control and, in the last decade especially, has been milking this country and the middle class dry. The system has done little lately but promote the wretched excess the rich relish at the expense of the middle and lower income classes. I do not advocate general "nationalization" of corporations. I do advocate much more control of corporations, especially those corporations in the areas of energy production and delivery, health insurance, hospitalization and transportation. I will admit to being intrigued with the idea of public control of natural resources, especially those resources in the field of energy. I am impressed with what the Norwegians have done with their oil resources. Your final comment in your personal attack (and that is what it is, after all), is just wishful thinking on your part. I was neither tormented nor a tormentor in my youth...or since. I simply find today's conservatives disgusting. I mentioned here several times my mother was a lifelong Republican and a minor functionary in the party in our home state. If she were alive today, she'd have nothing to do with the national GOP and its small-mindedness, racism, and hate-mongering. |
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/16/11 9:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500, wrote: You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur Logic police, please take note. D'oh. What do *you* think is behind the birthers, dip****? Hint: it is Obama's skin color. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com