|
Warning to rec.boats
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:14:31 -0500, L G wrote:
Harryk wrote: On 2/13/11 2:38 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 2/13/11 2:14 PM, BAR wrote: In articleJKKdnX6iAb_GsMXQnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... On 2/13/11 2:10 PM, BAR wrote: In , payer3389 @mypacks.net says... Maybe you should give credit when you plagiarize. Harry's aversion to URLs is intended to hide the source of his information. Actually, Mr. IQ, I posted again on this subject, pointing out the military's trashing of Aberdeen with yet another superfund site. I did include the URL there. I assume the article was anti-miliatry and anti-business. It most likely fit your political goals. Of course, neither you nor the other right-wing retard are interested in the URLs or the military's involvement in trashing the environment. That's the real issue. not your deflection of it. The military is run by civilians. I remember reading and seeing many news items about that Navy site in Jax. It was adjacent to the river there, and a major polluter of some really horrific chemicals. I see. Where does the I was just following orders excuse apply. Telling the truth about military pollution is, naturally, anti-military. D'oh. Where does the excuse, I was just following orders apply/ Probably every day during your entirely stateside stint with the marines. It's not as if original thinking is a requirement, eh? Just as I thought. You can't think past your biases. Actually, I had a much higher opinion of the military until I encountered you, Herring and flajim here. I've known a few retired military guys in my lifetime and all of them seemed quite honorable to me. I suppose the military lowered its standards significantly to let you boys in, eh? You really like that line, eh? Try for some originality next time. It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. |
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/15/11 8:34 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:14:31 -0500, L wrote: Harryk wrote: On 2/13/11 2:38 PM, BAR wrote: In , says... On 2/13/11 2:14 PM, BAR wrote: In articleJKKdnX6iAb_GsMXQnZ2dnUVZ_uudnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... On 2/13/11 2:10 PM, BAR wrote: In , payer3389 @mypacks.net says... Maybe you should give credit when you plagiarize. Harry's aversion to URLs is intended to hide the source of his information. Actually, Mr. IQ, I posted again on this subject, pointing out the military's trashing of Aberdeen with yet another superfund site. I did include the URL there. I assume the article was anti-miliatry and anti-business. It most likely fit your political goals. Of course, neither you nor the other right-wing retard are interested in the URLs or the military's involvement in trashing the environment. That's the real issue. not your deflection of it. The military is run by civilians. I remember reading and seeing many news items about that Navy site in Jax. It was adjacent to the river there, and a major polluter of some really horrific chemicals. I see. Where does the I was just following orders excuse apply. Telling the truth about military pollution is, naturally, anti-military. D'oh. Where does the excuse, I was just following orders apply/ Probably every day during your entirely stateside stint with the marines. It's not as if original thinking is a requirement, eh? Just as I thought. You can't think past your biases. Actually, I had a much higher opinion of the military until I encountered you, Herring and flajim here. I've known a few retired military guys in my lifetime and all of them seemed quite honorable to me. I suppose the military lowered its standards significantly to let you boys in, eh? You really like that line, eh? Try for some originality next time. It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. You are a racist. There is no valid rationale for your opinions. |
Warning to rec.boats
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says... Just as I thought. You can't think past your biases. Actually, I had a much higher opinion of the military until I encountered you, Herring and flajim here. I've known a few retired military guys in my lifetime and all of them seemed quite honorable to me. I suppose the military lowered its standards significantly to let you boys in, eh? You really like that line, eh? Try for some originality next time. It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. You are a racist. There is no valid rationale for your opinions. The knee jerk liberal strikes again. If you don't agree with me your are a racist response. It is getting very tiresome to always hear the same thing coming from you Harry. Why don't you and Paul get together and come up with some new material. |
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/16/11 8:29 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlewNGdnfz0EPsuocbQnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... Just as I thought. You can't think past your biases. Actually, I had a much higher opinion of the military until I encountered you, Herring and flajim here. I've known a few retired military guys in my lifetime and all of them seemed quite honorable to me. I suppose the military lowered its standards significantly to let you boys in, eh? You really like that line, eh? Try for some originality next time. It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. You are a racist. There is no valid rationale for your opinions. The knee jerk liberal strikes again. If you don't agree with me your are a racist response. It is getting very tiresome to always hear the same thing coming from you Harry. Why don't you and Paul get together and come up with some new material. You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist. |
Warning to rec.boats
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John H
wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. |
Warning to rec.boats
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:47:11 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John H wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. You are correct. Actually, there are only a few here that I put in the same category as Harry - deplume and Donnie. Slammer, although a Harry follower, gets his own category. I'm supposing that he doesn't realize he really does need some help. Of course, most alcoholics have to hit there own 'bottom' before they seek help. Some hit there 'bottom' early, some don't. I find it best to ignore the great majority of his taunts, name-calling, and personal insults. |
Warning to rec.boats
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500, Harryk
wrote: You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur Logic police, please take note. |
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/16/11 8:47 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. The "free enterprise system" is out of control and, in the last decade especially, has been milking this country and the middle class dry. The system has done little lately but promote the wretched excess the rich relish at the expense of the middle and lower income classes. I do not advocate general "nationalization" of corporations. I do advocate much more control of corporations, especially those corporations in the areas of energy production and delivery, health insurance, hospitalization and transportation. I will admit to being intrigued with the idea of public control of natural resources, especially those resources in the field of energy. I am impressed with what the Norwegians have done with their oil resources. Your final comment in your personal attack (and that is what it is, after all), is just wishful thinking on your part. I was neither tormented nor a tormentor in my youth...or since. I simply find today's conservatives disgusting. I mentioned here several times my mother was a lifelong Republican and a minor functionary in the party in our home state. If she were alive today, she'd have nothing to do with the national GOP and its small-mindedness, racism, and hate-mongering. |
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/16/11 9:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500, wrote: You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur Logic police, please take note. D'oh. What do *you* think is behind the birthers, dip****? Hint: it is Obama's skin color. |
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/16/11 8:47 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. Lil W'hine has thrown in with Scott Ingersoll and Loogy. |
Warning to rec.boats
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:20:59 -0500, Harryk
wrote: On 2/16/11 9:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500, wrote: You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur Logic police, please take note. D'oh. What do *you* think is behind the birthers, dip****? Hint: it is Obama's skin color. There are quite a few people who legitimately don't care for him regardless of race. That's what makes your statement a non sequitur not to mention an ad hominem attack. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem Logic police, please take note. |
Warning to rec.boats
|
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/16/11 9:58 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:20:59 -0500, wrote: On 2/16/11 9:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500, wrote: You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur Logic police, please take note. D'oh. What do *you* think is behind the birthers, dip****? Hint: it is Obama's skin color. There are quite a few people who legitimately don't care for him regardless of race. That's what makes your statement a non sequitur not to mention an ad hominem attack. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem Logic police, please take note. You're talking about those who don't like Obama for reasons other than race. Sure. Lots of those. I'm talking about birthers. They don't like Obama because of his race. Bertie is a birther. |
Warning to rec.boats
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:17:32 -0500, Harryk
wrote: Your final comment in your personal attack No one would doubt your expertise in that area. The only question is what created your hateful and unpleasant personality. We can only guess but it almost always stems from some childhood conflict, perhaps parental, or perhaps the fact that you really didn't fit in to the Yankee/WASP Connecticut culture where you grew up. Too bad you never got help for it. |
Warning to rec.boats
|
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/16/11 10:03 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:17:32 -0500, wrote: Your final comment in your personal attack No one would doubt your expertise in that area. The only question is what created your hateful and unpleasant personality. We can only guess but it almost always stems from some childhood conflict, perhaps parental, or perhaps the fact that you really didn't fit in to the Yankee/WASP Connecticut culture where you grew up. Too bad you never got help for it. You don't know much sociology, either. I didn't grow up in waspy Fairfield County, west of Bridgeport. I grew up in ethnic New Haven, a small manufacturing city at that time dominated religiously by Catholics and Jews, and ethnically by European immigrants and their children and their families, mainly from Italy, Ireland, Poland, Hungary, Greece and, interestingly, Portugal, and blacks. It was a polyglot culture. The mayor was of Italian descent, as were many of the Aldermen. Our Congressman was Italian. Hardly WASPs. I grew up in a New Haven suburb. Our neighbors on one side were Italian immigrants. The father became a lawyer, the mother was a traditional Italian homemaker and they had four kids, all of whom were pals of mine. The kids became lawyers, a doctor and a public school teacher. The house on the other side held a family of Americans of Greek heritage. They had one son who I remember as a superior athlete. After junior high was over for the day, most of us walked two blocks to the playground at a nearby Catholic church, mostly Irish Catholics. The nuns supervised the playground after hours, so it was a safe place for us kids to hang out with other kids of every race, religion and ethnic background. Our Boy Scout troop met in the classrooms of a synagogue and day school, because the scoutmaster, who was not Jewish, knew the head rabbi there. When we got to go swimming in the winter, we went to either the Boys' Club, the YMCA, or the Jewish Community Center, all of which had pretty nifty indoor pools. So, you see, W'hine, there wasn't much WASP culture around to give me that WASP feeling of entitlement. What explains your holier-than-thou persona, W'hine? Did your WASP parents imbue you with the concept that you were, somehow, superior, because of your heritage? With an attitude like that, you would have lasted two days at Hillhouse High School, which in those days, but not now, was the top public high school in the state. |
Warning to rec.boats
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says... On 2/16/11 10:03 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:17:32 -0500, wrote: Your final comment in your personal attack No one would doubt your expertise in that area. The only question is what created your hateful and unpleasant personality. We can only guess but it almost always stems from some childhood conflict, perhaps parental, or perhaps the fact that you really didn't fit in to the Yankee/WASP Connecticut culture where you grew up. Too bad you never got help for it. You don't know much sociology, either. I didn't grow up in waspy Fairfield County, west of Bridgeport. I grew up in ethnic New Haven, a small manufacturing city at that time dominated religiously by Catholics and Jews, and ethnically by European immigrants and their children and their families, mainly from Italy, Ireland, Poland, Hungary, Greece and, interestingly, Portugal, and blacks. It was a polyglot culture. The mayor was of Italian descent, as were many of the Aldermen. Our Congressman was Italian. Hardly WASPs. I grew up in a New Haven suburb. Our neighbors on one side were Italian immigrants. The father became a lawyer, the mother was a traditional Italian homemaker and they had four kids, all of whom were pals of mine. The kids became lawyers, a doctor and a public school teacher. The house on the other side held a family of Americans of Greek heritage. They had one son who I remember as a superior athlete. After junior high was over for the day, most of us walked two blocks to the playground at a nearby Catholic church, mostly Irish Catholics. The nuns supervised the playground after hours, so it was a safe place for us kids to hang out with other kids of every race, religion and ethnic background. Our Boy Scout troop met in the classrooms of a synagogue and day school, because the scoutmaster, who was not Jewish, knew the head rabbi there. When we got to go swimming in the winter, we went to either the Boys' Club, the YMCA, or the Jewish Community Center, all of which had pretty nifty indoor pools. So, you see, W'hine, there wasn't much WASP culture around to give me that WASP feeling of entitlement. What explains your holier-than-thou persona, W'hine? Did your WASP parents imbue you with the concept that you were, somehow, superior, because of your heritage? With an attitude like that, you would have lasted two days at Hillhouse High School, which in those days, but not now, was the top public high school in the state. Amazing! You were and are always surrounded by superior people! |
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/16/11 11:30 AM, New Giant Boat wrote:
In articlekdGdnVQMFYFJbcbQnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... On 2/16/11 10:03 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:17:32 -0500, wrote: Your final comment in your personal attack No one would doubt your expertise in that area. The only question is what created your hateful and unpleasant personality. We can only guess but it almost always stems from some childhood conflict, perhaps parental, or perhaps the fact that you really didn't fit in to the Yankee/WASP Connecticut culture where you grew up. Too bad you never got help for it. You don't know much sociology, either. I didn't grow up in waspy Fairfield County, west of Bridgeport. I grew up in ethnic New Haven, a small manufacturing city at that time dominated religiously by Catholics and Jews, and ethnically by European immigrants and their children and their families, mainly from Italy, Ireland, Poland, Hungary, Greece and, interestingly, Portugal, and blacks. It was a polyglot culture. The mayor was of Italian descent, as were many of the Aldermen. Our Congressman was Italian. Hardly WASPs. I grew up in a New Haven suburb. Our neighbors on one side were Italian immigrants. The father became a lawyer, the mother was a traditional Italian homemaker and they had four kids, all of whom were pals of mine. The kids became lawyers, a doctor and a public school teacher. The house on the other side held a family of Americans of Greek heritage. They had one son who I remember as a superior athlete. After junior high was over for the day, most of us walked two blocks to the playground at a nearby Catholic church, mostly Irish Catholics. The nuns supervised the playground after hours, so it was a safe place for us kids to hang out with other kids of every race, religion and ethnic background. Our Boy Scout troop met in the classrooms of a synagogue and day school, because the scoutmaster, who was not Jewish, knew the head rabbi there. When we got to go swimming in the winter, we went to either the Boys' Club, the YMCA, or the Jewish Community Center, all of which had pretty nifty indoor pools. So, you see, W'hine, there wasn't much WASP culture around to give me that WASP feeling of entitlement. What explains your holier-than-thou persona, W'hine? Did your WASP parents imbue you with the concept that you were, somehow, superior, because of your heritage? With an attitude like that, you would have lasted two days at Hillhouse High School, which in those days, but not now, was the top public high school in the state. Amazing! You were and are always surrounded by superior people! Actually it was only considered one of the top public high schools because Harry was there. As a top student, Harry was accepted to the University of Kansas. As everyone knows U of K is considered the Harvard of the Midwest or as Harvard likes to say, they are the Univ. of Kansas of the East Coast. |
Warning to rec.boats
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:04:45 -0500, New Giant Boat wrote:
In article , says... On 2/16/11 8:47 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. Lil W'hine has thrown in with Scott Ingersoll and Loogy. Why must you always bring loogy into discussion? Are you that infatuated with someone that you must post about him even though he's not posted here in a long, long time? Actually, that's the reason he does so. He knows Loogy isn't responding, so he doesn't need to worry about being harshly put down. |
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/16/2011 10:44 AM, Harryk wrote:
On 2/16/11 10:03 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:17:32 -0500, wrote: Your final comment in your personal attack No one would doubt your expertise in that area. The only question is what created your hateful and unpleasant personality. We can only guess but it almost always stems from some childhood conflict, perhaps parental, or perhaps the fact that you really didn't fit in to the Yankee/WASP Connecticut culture where you grew up. Too bad you never got help for it. You don't know much sociology, either. I didn't grow up in waspy Fairfield County, west of Bridgeport. I grew up in ethnic New Haven, a small manufacturing city at that time dominated religiously by Catholics and Jews, and ethnically by European immigrants and their children and their families, mainly from Italy, Ireland, Poland, Hungary, Greece and, interestingly, Portugal, and blacks. It was a polyglot culture. The mayor was of Italian descent, as were many of the Aldermen. Our Congressman was Italian. Hardly WASPs. I grew up in a New Haven suburb. Our neighbors on one side were Italian immigrants. The father became a lawyer, the mother was a traditional Italian homemaker and they had four kids, all of whom were pals of mine. The kids became lawyers, a doctor and a public school teacher. The house on the other side held a family of Americans of Greek heritage. They had one son who I remember as a superior athlete. After junior high was over for the day, most of us walked two blocks to the playground at a nearby Catholic church, mostly Irish Catholics. The nuns supervised the playground after hours, so it was a safe place for us kids to hang out with other kids of every race, religion and ethnic background. Our Boy Scout troop met in the classrooms of a synagogue and day school, because the scoutmaster, who was not Jewish, knew the head rabbi there. When we got to go swimming in the winter, we went to either the Boys' Club, the YMCA, or the Jewish Community Center, all of which had pretty nifty indoor pools. So, you see, W'hine, there wasn't much WASP culture around to give me that WASP feeling of entitlement. What explains your holier-than-thou persona, W'hine? Did your WASP parents imbue you with the concept that you were, somehow, superior, because of your heritage? With an attitude like that, you would have lasted two days at Hillhouse High School, which in those days, but not now, was the top public high school in the state. Interesting. Sounds like Wayne hit a nerve. Any child who at 13 years of age was having sexual intercourse has deep seated sociopath issues. 1. Contemptuous of those who seek to understand them 2. Does not perceive that anything is wrong with them 3. Authoritarian 4. Secretive 5. Paranoid 6. Only rarely in difficulty with the law, but seeks out situations where their tyrannical behavior will be tolerated, condoned, or admired 7. Conventional appearance 8. Goal of enslavement of their victim(s) 9. Exercises despotic control over every aspect of the victim's life 10. Has an emotional need to justify their crimes and therefore needs their victim's affirmation (respect, gratitude and love) 11. Ultimate goal is the creation of a willing victim 12. Incapable of real human attachment to another 13. Unable to feel remorse or guilt 14. Extreme narcissism and grandiose 15. May state readily that their goal is to rule the world http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html |
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/16/11 11:50 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:04:45 -0500, New Giant wrote: In , says... On 2/16/11 8:47 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. Lil W'hine has thrown in with Scott Ingersoll and Loogy. Why must you always bring loogy into discussion? Are you that infatuated with someone that you must post about him even though he's not posted here in a long, long time? Actually, that's the reason he does so. He knows Loogy isn't responding, so he doesn't need to worry about being harshly put down. 1. "He knows Loogy isn't responding...." Bull****. 2. "...he doesn't need to worry about being harshly put down..." I never worry about that. Think about it. Those who try are either right-wing turds or, in the case of loogy, mindless turds. Why worry about people like you? |
Warning to rec.boats
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says... On 2/16/11 11:50 AM, John H wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:04:45 -0500, New Giant wrote: In , says... On 2/16/11 8:47 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. Lil W'hine has thrown in with Scott Ingersoll and Loogy. Why must you always bring loogy into discussion? Are you that infatuated with someone that you must post about him even though he's not posted here in a long, long time? Actually, that's the reason he does so. He knows Loogy isn't responding, so he doesn't need to worry about being harshly put down. 1. "He knows Loogy isn't responding...." Bull****. 2. "...he doesn't need to worry about being harshly put down..." I never worry about that. Think about it. Those who try are either right-wing turds or, in the case of loogy, mindless turds. Why worry about people like you? Harry, here's some words for you to think about: Te be persuasive, we must be believable. To be believable, we must be credible. To be credible, we must be truthful. Edward Mora If you'd only follow those simple rules, you'd have a much better relationship with others. |
Warning to rec.boats
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:44:20 -0500, Harryk
wrote: Our Boy Scout troop met in the classrooms of a synagogue and day school, because the scoutmaster, who was not Jewish, knew the head rabbi there. You were a Boy Scout? What happened to Trustworthy, Loyal, Helpful, Friendly, Courteous, Kind, Cheerful, Reverent, etc. ?? http://usscouts.org/advance/boyscout/bsoathlaw.asp You need to go back for some remedial scouting. |
Warning to rec.boats
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:58:27 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:20:59 -0500, Harryk wrote: On 2/16/11 9:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500, wrote: You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur Logic police, please take note. D'oh. What do *you* think is behind the birthers, dip****? Hint: it is Obama's skin color. There are quite a few people who legitimately don't care for him regardless of race. That's what makes your statement a non sequitur not to mention an ad hominem attack. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem Logic police, please take note. Yes, you're right .. there are quite a few people who don't like his policies or even Obama as a person. That's not in question. The issue is there are also a lot (many here) who are birthers and racists. They aren't birthers because there's a legitimate question of his birth place. They are birthers because they're racists and that's about all they have to sustain them. |
Warning to rec.boats
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:47:11 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John H wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. This is off topic. Why are you posting this here? Take your political crap somewhere else. There ARE very few people who advocate overthrowing free enterprise and want to nationalize corps. You're claiming Harry wants both, but I haven't seen any evidence to support that. What I have seen is that you've got no problem with ad hominem attacks, which you claim to be against. It's called being a hypocrite. |
Warning to rec.boats
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:00:41 -0500, John H
wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:47:11 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John H wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. You are correct. Actually, there are only a few here that I put in the same category as Harry - deplume and Donnie. Slammer, although a Harry follower, gets his own category. I'm supposing that he doesn't realize he really does need some help. Of course, most alcoholics have to hit there own 'bottom' before they seek help. Some hit there 'bottom' early, some don't. I find it best to ignore the great majority of his taunts, name-calling, and personal insults. You're in a category also. It's not even exclusive you. You're a racist and a liar, and you've just demonstrated it (again) for all to see. |
Warning to rec.boats
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:03:58 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:17:32 -0500, Harryk wrote: Your final comment in your personal attack No one would doubt your expertise in that area. The only question is what created your hateful and unpleasant personality. We can only guess but it almost always stems from some childhood conflict, perhaps parental, or perhaps the fact that you really didn't fit in to the Yankee/WASP Connecticut culture where you grew up. Too bad you never got help for it. This is off topic and a personal attack. Why are you doing what you say you're against? Take this somewhere else. |
Warning to rec.boats
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:03:08 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:44:20 -0500, Harryk wrote: Our Boy Scout troop met in the classrooms of a synagogue and day school, because the scoutmaster, who was not Jewish, knew the head rabbi there. You were a Boy Scout? What happened to Trustworthy, Loyal, Helpful, Friendly, Courteous, Kind, Cheerful, Reverent, etc. ?? http://usscouts.org/advance/boyscout/bsoathlaw.asp You need to go back for some remedial scouting. What happened to honesty on your part Wayne? Why don't you claim again that all the filth in this country is coming from the left. Or, better yet, take it to alt.politics.I'm-a-birther. |
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/16/11 2:23 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:58:27 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:20:59 -0500, wrote: On 2/16/11 9:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500, wrote: You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur Logic police, please take note. D'oh. What do *you* think is behind the birthers, dip****? Hint: it is Obama's skin color. There are quite a few people who legitimately don't care for him regardless of race. That's what makes your statement a non sequitur not to mention an ad hominem attack. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem Logic police, please take note. Yes, you're right .. there are quite a few people who don't like his policies or even Obama as a person. That's not in question. The issue is there are also a lot (many here) who are birthers and racists. They aren't birthers because there's a legitimate question of his birth place. They are birthers because they're racists and that's about all they have to sustain them. Indeed. Birthers and racists are one and the same. |
Warning to rec.boats
In article ,
says... On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:04:45 -0500, New Giant Boat wrote: In article , says... On 2/16/11 8:47 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. Lil W'hine has thrown in with Scott Ingersoll and Loogy. Why must you always bring loogy into discussion? Are you that infatuated with someone that you must post about him even though he's not posted here in a long, long time? Actually, that's the reason he does so. He knows Loogy isn't responding, so he doesn't need to worry about being harshly put down. Kind of like Harry trying to say his school system was "top in the state", it's a lie. It was never the "top school in the state". Harry just made that up because he knows my system/town was voted best school system in the country twice in the late 60s to early 70s with one year the town of Manchester took the title between those two years and Harry figured he cold run with it, as he assumed I was not here anymore. As to why, you hit it on the head, he post this bull because he thinks he can get away with it, but that bull **** is just enough to bring me back out for one post;) |
Warning to rec.boats
On 2/16/11 4:06 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:04:45 -0500, New Giant wrote: In , says... On 2/16/11 8:47 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John wrote: It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at anything that reminds him of his tormented youth. Lil W'hine has thrown in with Scott Ingersoll and Loogy. Why must you always bring loogy into discussion? Are you that infatuated with someone that you must post about him even though he's not posted here in a long, long time? Actually, that's the reason he does so. He knows Loogy isn't responding, so he doesn't need to worry about being harshly put down. Kind of like Harry trying to say his school system was "top in the state", it's a lie. It was never the "top school in the state". Harry just made that up because he knows my system/town was voted best school system in the country twice in the late 60s to early 70s with one year the town of Manchester took the title between those two years and Harry figured he cold run with it, as he assumed I was not here anymore. As to why, you hit it on the head, he post this bull because he thinks he can get away with it, but that bull **** is just enough to bring me back out for one post;) 1. You said you were through here, or words to that effect. More of your buill****, I guess. 2. I don't know anything about your town in the late 1960's to early 1970s, or, in fact, any other time. I graduated high school in the early 1960s. |
Warning to rec.boats
Harryk wrote:
On 2/16/11 9:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500, wrote: You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur Logic police, please take note. D'oh. What do *you* think is behind the birthers, dip****? Hint: it is Obama's skin color. He's half black. So what? That has nothing to do with his place of birth. |
Warning to rec.boats
Harryk wrote:
On 2/16/11 9:58 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:20:59 -0500, wrote: On 2/16/11 9:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500, wrote: You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur Logic police, please take note. D'oh. What do *you* think is behind the birthers, dip****? Hint: it is Obama's skin color. There are quite a few people who legitimately don't care for him regardless of race. That's what makes your statement a non sequitur not to mention an ad hominem attack. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem Logic police, please take note. You're talking about those who don't like Obama for reasons other than race. Sure. Lots of those. I'm talking about birthers. They don't like Obama because of his race. Bertie is a birther. That's pure bull****, WAFA. |
Warning to rec.boats
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says... On 2/16/11 8:29 AM, BAR wrote: In articlewNGdnfz0EPsuocbQnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389 @mypacks.net says... Just as I thought. You can't think past your biases. Actually, I had a much higher opinion of the military until I encountered you, Herring and flajim here. I've known a few retired military guys in my lifetime and all of them seemed quite honorable to me. I suppose the military lowered its standards significantly to let you boys in, eh? You really like that line, eh? Try for some originality next time. It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my opinion. You are a racist. There is no valid rationale for your opinions. The knee jerk liberal strikes again. If you don't agree with me your are a racist response. It is getting very tiresome to always hear the same thing coming from you Harry. Why don't you and Paul get together and come up with some new material. You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist. You are a one trick pony. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com