Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#101
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/29/2010 4:32 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/29/10 4:25 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/2010 2:17 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: It's a rather sad commentary that I've behaved so badly here, that I now need to worry that someone might actually take the time to travel here and vandalize my boat. For those who think the ID spoofing assholes are now behaving, check the post immediately above. These spoofers have *no* interest in helping reform rec.boats into a decent newsgroup. The referenced post provides the evidence needed to prove my point that I am correct in not posting photos or detailed descriptions of our new boat. It's too bad we still have these cowardly rat-turds among us. I suppose if you changed your handle, the sleazeball ID thief would change his. Nice folks, these. |
#102
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:48:39 -0400, "Paul@BYC"
wrote: On 10/29/2010 4:32 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/10 4:25 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/2010 2:17 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: It's a rather sad commentary that I've behaved so badly here, that I now need to worry that someone might actually take the time to travel here and vandalize my boat. For those who think the ID spoofing assholes are now behaving, check the post immediately above. These spoofers have *no* interest in helping reform rec.boats into a decent newsgroup. The referenced post provides the evidence needed to prove my point that I am correct in not posting photos or detailed descriptions of our new boat. It's too bad we still have these cowardly rat-turds among us. I suppose if you changed your handle, the sleazeball ID thief would change his. Nice folks, these. You're catching on... |
#103
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/29/10 5:00 PM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:48:39 -0400, "Paul@BYC" wrote: On 10/29/2010 4:32 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/10 4:25 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/2010 2:17 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: It's a rather sad commentary that I've behaved so badly here, that I now need to worry that someone might actually take the time to travel here and vandalize my boat. For those who think the ID spoofing assholes are now behaving, check the post immediately above. These spoofers have *no* interest in helping reform rec.boats into a decent newsgroup. The referenced post provides the evidence needed to prove my point that I am correct in not posting photos or detailed descriptions of our new boat. It's too bad we still have these cowardly rat-turds among us. I suppose if you changed your handle, the sleazeball ID thief would change his. Nice folks, these. You're catching on... It doesn't take long for the slime to out itself here. It's really too bad, because it looks like many posters are trying. That obviously annoys the ID spoofers; they prefer a pig pen. |
#104
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/29/10 7:40 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
It doesn't take long for the slime to out itself here. It's really too bad, because it looks like many posters are trying. That obviously annoys the ID spoofers; they prefer a pig pen. ...remembering why the spoofers came in the first place. Indeed, they came here because they don't have boats, they couldn't compete in the arena of ideas, and they wanted to be noticed and see how much crap they could create. You think they had some impact on me...but they didn't, and they never would. Their true colors are showing...they're still behaving like the assholes they are. And you are playing with them. Why not just give it a rest? |
#105
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
news ![]() On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:17:45 -0400, Secular Humouresque wrote: No photos, for several reasons. including, but not limited to, this one: First, for the next three weeks or so, the boat is being slipped at a local marina with easy public access, and considering the short tempers and other negative personality traits of some of the posters here, it could easily become a target for being "sniped" or worse, as it were. I'm certainly glad I don't have to worry about that sort of thing. This guy seems a little paranoid. |
#106
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:50:46 -0400, "Jim" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message news ![]() On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:17:45 -0400, Secular Humouresque wrote: No photos, for several reasons. including, but not limited to, this one: First, for the next three weeks or so, the boat is being slipped at a local marina with easy public access, and considering the short tempers and other negative personality traits of some of the posters here, it could easily become a target for being "sniped" or worse, as it were. I'm certainly glad I don't have to worry about that sort of thing. This guy seems a little paranoid. What goes around comes around. |
#107
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/30/10 7:44 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:50:46 -0400, wrote: wrote in message news ![]() On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:17:45 -0400, Secular Humouresque wrote: No photos, for several reasons. including, but not limited to, this one: First, for the next three weeks or so, the boat is being slipped at a local marina with easy public access, and considering the short tempers and other negative personality traits of some of the posters here, it could easily become a target for being "sniped" or worse, as it were. I'm certainly glad I don't have to worry about that sort of thing. This guy seems a little paranoid. What goes around comes around. I recall three mentally unbalanced individuals who have posted here and whose level of self-control was so lacking, they each threatened to drive to where I live and "teach me" a lesson. Considering who the posters are, I didn't take the threats seriously, but, you never know, do you? Their behavior is monster of their creation, not mine. Hey, I just noticed...we have a "new" Jim. Right. |
#108
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/29/2010 8:08 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/29/10 7:40 PM, I am Tosk wrote: It doesn't take long for the slime to out itself here. It's really too bad, because it looks like many posters are trying. That obviously annoys the ID spoofers; they prefer a pig pen. ...remembering why the spoofers came in the first place. Indeed, they came here because they don't have boats, they couldn't compete in the arena of ideas, and they wanted to be noticed and see how much crap they could create. You think they had some impact on me...but they didn't, and they never would. You sure do get noticed when you use an ID like, well, Secular Humouresque. It has great impact. No, not on me, of course not. I meant, I have a great impact, with my ID. |
#109
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:23:08 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote: We all knew there would be a couple dingleballs hanging on. That's what filters are for.. Yes. |
#110
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... "YukonBound" wrote in message ... "Secular Humouresque" wrote in message ... On 10/30/10 8:44 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/2010 8:08 PM, Secular Humouresque wrote: On 10/29/10 7:40 PM, I am Tosk wrote: It doesn't take long for the slime to out itself here. It's really too bad, because it looks like many posters are trying. That obviously annoys the ID spoofers; they prefer a pig pen. ...remembering why the spoofers came in the first place. Indeed, they came here because they don't have boats, they couldn't compete in the arena of ideas, and they wanted to be noticed and see how much crap they could create. You think they had some impact on me...but they didn't, and they never would. You sure do get noticed when you use an ID like, well, Secular Humouresque. It has great impact. No, not on me, of course not. I meant, I have a great impact, with my ID. Yet another example from an ID spoofing poster who cannot keep his pants zipped in here. Might be time for those 'in the know' to expose these spoofers in the interests of group harmony. I can see all the good work slipping through our fingers. Of course, if that's your intention, we can't stop you. It's up to you. Peace and tranquility, or the old mud slinging free for all. Well, Donnie has been asked at least a dozen times and it's obvious what he is really here for.. We all knew there would be a couple dingleballs hanging on. That's what filters are for.. -- I'm watching you...closely, dingleball! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Which would be worse? | General | |||
Worse than Guantanamo! | ASA | |||
Could be worse ... | Cruising |