Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/25/10 9:17 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote:
YukonBound wrote: slither So who's still hurling insults? Not me! And the ID spoofing continues, as evidence by the post immediately above. Obviously, the spoofer has no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. |
#82
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 9:17 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: YukonBound wrote: slither So who's still hurling insults? Not me! And the ID spoofing continues, as evidence by the post immediately above. Obviously, the spoofer has no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. Nor YukonBound, for that matter. |
#83
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... On 10/25/10 9:17 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: YukonBound wrote: slither So who's still hurling insults? Not me! And the ID spoofing continues, as evidence by the post immediately above. Obviously, the spoofer has no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. So, filter him... Filter myself? Silly boy... |
#84
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:19:33 -0400, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/25/10 9:17 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: YukonBound wrote: slither So who's still hurling insults? Not me! And the ID spoofing continues, as evidence by the post immediately above. Obviously, the spoofer has no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. Like I told Scotty, ignore it. -- I hope your day is simply spectacular! John H |
#85
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#86
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:03:54 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote: In article , says... In article , says... On 10/25/10 9:17 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: YukonBound wrote: slither So who's still hurling insults? Not me! And the ID spoofing continues, as evidence by the post immediately above. Obviously, the spoofer has no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. Would you say that your actions here in the past helped "improve" the atmosphere here? Doesn't matter anymore... We all have a clean slate, well, except for you now I guess... ![]() According the the all-knowing, all-powerful Tosk, apparently. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#88
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/29/10 2:06 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On 10/29/10 1:03 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... In articlewaCdnbuBj8V4HljRnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@earthlink .com, says... On 10/25/10 9:17 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: YukonBound wrote: slither So who's still hurling insults? Not me! And the ID spoofing continues, as evidence by the post immediately above. Obviously, the spoofer has no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. Would you say that your actions here in the past helped "improve" the atmosphere here? Doesn't matter anymore... We all have a clean slate, well, except for you now I guess... ![]() What do you think the intentions are of someone who logs on with that handle and trolls, Tosk? Why encourage them by responding at all? I will see how things go for now... Back to that boat, wtf can it hurt... I mean, who here could snipe at a brand new boat, and if they do.. well, you know where they are coming from. However, if you decide to post some pix (shed some skin for the group) I will join your boycott (shed some skin too)... No photos, for several reasons. including, but not limited to, this one: First, for the next three weeks or so, the boat is being slipped at a local marina with easy public access, and considering the short tempers and other negative personality traits of some of the posters here, it could easily become a target for being "sniped" or worse, as it were. If I see you on the waterways, I'll wave. |
#89
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/29/2010 12:59 PM, Hairy Crotch wrote:
In articlewaCdnbuBj8V4HljRnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@earthlink .com, says... On 10/25/10 9:17 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: YukonBound wrote: slither So who's still hurling insults? Not me! And the ID spoofing continues, as evidence by the post immediately above. Obviously, the spoofer has no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. Would you say that your actions here in the past helped "improve" the atmosphere here? Well, I just bet you're one of the infamous rec.boats "bad boys." No sense reading any more of your posts; you can join the ID spoofers and two other jerks on the "plonked" list. |
#90
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 29, 2:17*pm, Secular Humouresque wrote:
On 10/29/10 2:06 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 10/29/10 1:03 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... In articlewaCdnbuBj8V4HljRnZ2dnUVZ_vudn...@earthlink .com, says... On 10/25/10 9:17 AM, Secular Humouresque wrote: YukonBound wrote: slither So who's still hurling insults? Not me! And the ID spoofing continues, as evidence by the post immediately above. Obviously, the spoofer has no interest in improving the atmosphere in rec.boats. Would you say that your actions here in the past helped "improve" the atmosphere here? Doesn't matter anymore... We all have a clean slate, well, except for you now I guess... ![]() What do you think the intentions are of someone who logs on with that handle and trolls, Tosk? Why encourage them by responding at all? I will see how things go for now... Back to that boat, wtf can it hurt... I mean, who here could snipe at a brand new boat, and if they do.. well, you know where they are coming from. However, if you decide to post some pix (shed some skin for the group) I will join your boycott (shed some skin too)... No photos, for several reasons. including, but not limited to, this one: First, for the next three weeks or so, the boat is being slipped at a local marina with easy public access, and considering the short tempers and other negative personality traits of some of the posters here, it could easily become a target for being "sniped" or worse, as it were. If I see you on the waterways, I'll wave.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Fair enough I guess. but I would think you could at least show some closeups of the dash or something that wouldn't leave you too identifyable... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Which would be worse? | General | |||
Worse than Guantanamo! | ASA | |||
Could be worse ... | Cruising |