"Califbill" wrote in message
...


"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was
antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina
family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine
that.

didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more
important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves


And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states
telling
the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states.

so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed.

no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property


You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about
economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free the
slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first order.
Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run to the
racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be stupid and
broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to raise taxes on
the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out you and the wife
are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded fighting as an Ohio
Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You probably do not even know
a person of color, any color, as a friend.

Swill...lay off the sauce so early in the morning.
In one sentence you say he... "will always be stupid and broke"
and in the next you say "you find out you and the wife are rich".
Which is it?

In article ,
says...

"Califbill" wrote in message
...


"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was
antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina
family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine
that.

didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more
important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves


And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states
telling
the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states.

so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed.

no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property


You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about
economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free the
slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first order.
Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run to the
racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be stupid and
broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to raise taxes on
the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out you and the wife
are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded fighting as an Ohio
Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You probably do not even know
a person of color, any color, as a friend.

Swill...lay off the sauce so early in the morning.
In one sentence you say he... "will always be stupid and broke"
and in the next you say "you find out you and the wife are rich".
Which is it?

You might say the same thing to your drunken lazy son.

"YukonBound" wrote in message ...


"Califbill" wrote in message
...


"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
m...
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was
antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina
family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine
that.

didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more
important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves


And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states
telling
the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states.

so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed.

no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property


You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about
economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free the
slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first order.
Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run to the
racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be stupid and
broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to raise taxes on
the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out you and the wife
are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded fighting as an Ohio
Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You probably do not even know
a person of color, any color, as a friend.

Swill...lay off the sauce so early in the morning.
In one sentence you say he... "will always be stupid and broke"
and in the next you say "you find out you and the wife are rich".
Which is it?


He and you are two different people, obviously. A!

--
I'm the real Harry, and I post from a PC or a MAC, as virtually everyone knows.
If a post is attributed to me, and it isn't from a PC or a MAC, it's from an ID
spoofer who hasn't the balls to post with his current ID.

The magnificent Boatless Harry

"YukonBound" wrote in message
...


"Califbill" wrote in message
...


"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
m...
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was
antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina
family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine
that.

didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more
important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves


And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states
telling
the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states.

so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed.

no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property


You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about
economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free the
slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first order.
Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run to the
racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be stupid and
broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to raise taxes on
the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out you and the wife
are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded fighting as an Ohio
Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You probably do not even know
a person of color, any color, as a friend.

Swill...lay off the sauce so early in the morning.
In one sentence you say he... "will always be stupid and broke"
and in the next you say "you find out you and the wife are rich".
Which is it?

I am tired of your **** you asshole. I spelled it out as you are too
ignorant to fill in the blanks. You are the family with a drunken son, and
you seem to like the sauce also. Bob, claims he lost all his money when the
401k's tanked. He saved nothing. 401k is not saving, it is funding a
retirement plan. He claims to be a high paid engineer, not as high paid as
others as he has not had a raise in 10 years. Is wife is an attorney for
the county. They most likely have a combined income greater than $200,000.
He wants the rich taxed. And with his family income he is in the rich
category. You should have your spouse read your postings and then she will
beat the crap out of you for showing your stupidity! No only are you a
former government employee leaching off the government teat, you can not
afford a boat bigger than a small used Princecraft. Only way you got to
sail on a big boat as a suckup crew member. there were alcoholics in my
family and I rarely drink, unlike you who seem to get drunk with your son,
who finally moved out of the house at the age of 30+. You should stop
sucking up to Harry. He is a known liar, and since you can not google up
his name with political speech writers, he can not be very good at that
either.

In article ,
says...

"YukonBound" wrote in message
...


"Califbill" wrote in message
...


"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
m...
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was
antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina
family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine
that.

didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more
important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves


And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states
telling
the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states.

so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed.

no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property


You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about
economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free the
slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first order.
Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run to the
racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be stupid and
broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to raise taxes on
the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out you and the wife
are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded fighting as an Ohio
Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You probably do not even know
a person of color, any color, as a friend.

Swill...lay off the sauce so early in the morning.
In one sentence you say he... "will always be stupid and broke"
and in the next you say "you find out you and the wife are rich".
Which is it?

I am tired of your **** you asshole. I spelled it out as you are too
ignorant to fill in the blanks. You are the family with a drunken son, and
you seem to like the sauce also. Bob, claims he lost all his money when the
401k's tanked. He saved nothing. 401k is not saving, it is funding a
retirement plan. He claims to be a high paid engineer, not as high paid as
others as he has not had a raise in 10 years. Is wife is an attorney for
the county. They most likely have a combined income greater than $200,000.
He wants the rich taxed. And with his family income he is in the rich
category. You should have your spouse read your postings and then she will
beat the crap out of you for showing your stupidity! No only are you a
former government employee leaching off the government teat, you can not
afford a boat bigger than a small used Princecraft. Only way you got to
sail on a big boat as a suckup crew member. there were alcoholics in my
family and I rarely drink, unlike you who seem to get drunk with your son,
who finally moved out of the house at the age of 30+. You should stop
sucking up to Harry. He is a known liar, and since you can not google up
his name with political speech writers, he can not be very good at that
either.

Hey, I'm not a liar, everything I say is true. Want to hear the story
about my Maryland red barn? Don't look on zillow, they photoshopped it
out for some reason. Now, yes, Don does have a drunken son, and his wife
may soon enough see his ramblings.

On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:47:59 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



I am tired of your **** you asshole. I spelled it out as you are too
ignorant to fill in the blanks. You are the family with a drunken son, and
you seem to like the sauce also. Bob, claims he lost all his money when the
401k's tanked. He saved nothing. 401k is not saving, it is funding a
retirement plan.

i lost 30%. and i saved diligently, like i was supposed to...all my
life for 30 years. and wall street, courtesy of the rich and the right
wing...destroyed my savings.

He claims to be a high paid engineer, not as high paid as
others as he has not had a raise in 10 years.

gee. all i did was present the FACTS...remember those? if you'd like,
i can post the chart AGAIN. you seem to forget ihave the EVIDENCE
whereas all you have is toilet paper coating

Is wife is an attorney for
the county. They most likely have a combined income greater than $200,000.

WRONG

He wants the rich taxed. And with his family income he is in the rich
category

WRONG


you're so full of **** you qualify for a farm subsidy for fertilizer

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:47:59 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



I am tired of your **** you asshole. I spelled it out as you are too
ignorant to fill in the blanks. You are the family with a drunken son, and
you seem to like the sauce also. Bob, claims he lost all his money when the
401k's tanked. He saved nothing. 401k is not saving, it is funding a
retirement plan.

i lost 30%. and i saved diligently, like i was supposed to...all my
life for 30 years. and wall street, courtesy of the rich and the right
wing...destroyed my savings.

He claims to be a high paid engineer, not as high paid as

others as he has not had a raise in 10 years.

gee. all i did was present the FACTS...remember those? if you'd like,
i can post the chart AGAIN. you seem to forget ihave the EVIDENCE
whereas all you have is toilet paper coating

Is wife is an attorney for

the county. They most likely have a combined income greater than $200,000.

WRONG


He wants the rich taxed. And with his family income he is in the rich
category

WRONG


you're so full of **** you qualify for a farm subsidy for fertilizer

I "made" $11K today thanks to "Wall Street". IF you lost 30%, how did
you fare today? Did you move it all to cash?

You screwed up when you chose the wrong funds in your 401K. That's your
mistake. Call Obama and ask for a refund 202-456-1414.

On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 21:09:19 -0400, LG wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:47:59 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



I am tired of your **** you asshole. I spelled it out as you are too
ignorant to fill in the blanks. You are the family with a drunken son, and
you seem to like the sauce also. Bob, claims he lost all his money when the
401k's tanked. He saved nothing. 401k is not saving, it is funding a
retirement plan.

i lost 30%. and i saved diligently, like i was supposed to...all my
life for 30 years. and wall street, courtesy of the rich and the right
wing...destroyed my savings.

He claims to be a high paid engineer, not as high paid as

others as he has not had a raise in 10 years.

gee. all i did was present the FACTS...remember those? if you'd like,
i can post the chart AGAIN. you seem to forget ihave the EVIDENCE
whereas all you have is toilet paper coating

Is wife is an attorney for

the county. They most likely have a combined income greater than $200,000.

WRONG


He wants the rich taxed. And with his family income he is in the rich
category

WRONG


you're so full of **** you qualify for a farm subsidy for fertilizer

I "made" $11K today thanks to "Wall Street". IF you lost 30%, how did
you fare today? Did you move it all to cash?

i work for a living. i dont have time to diddle my bank acct all day
like you do

You screwed up when you chose the wrong funds in your 401K.

me and the entire middle class. you keep blaming the middle class for
doing what the rich gave us. typical right wing bull****

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 21:09:19 -0400, wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:47:59 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



I am tired of your **** you asshole. I spelled it out as you are too
ignorant to fill in the blanks. You are the family with a drunken son, and
you seem to like the sauce also. Bob, claims he lost all his money when the
401k's tanked. He saved nothing. 401k is not saving, it is funding a
retirement plan.


i lost 30%. and i saved diligently, like i was supposed to...all my
life for 30 years. and wall street, courtesy of the rich and the right
wing...destroyed my savings.

He claims to be a high paid engineer, not as high paid as


others as he has not had a raise in 10 years.


gee. all i did was present the FACTS...remember those? if you'd like,
i can post the chart AGAIN. you seem to forget ihave the EVIDENCE
whereas all you have is toilet paper coating

Is wife is an attorney for


the county. They most likely have a combined income greater than $200,000.


WRONG



He wants the rich taxed. And with his family income he is in the rich
category


WRONG


you're so full of **** you qualify for a farm subsidy for fertilizer


I "made" $11K today thanks to "Wall Street". IF you lost 30%, how did
you fare today? Did you move it all to cash?

i work for a living. i dont have time to diddle my bank acct all day
like you do

You screwed up when you chose the wrong funds in your 401K.

me and the entire middle class. you keep blaming the middle class for
doing what the rich gave us. typical right wing bull****


No, Bob, my retirement portfolio was up $11K today. I made no changes
or trades.

Your "middle class" diatribes boor me.

On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 22:02:33 -0400, LG wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 21:09:19 -0400, wrote:




you're so full of **** you qualify for a farm subsidy for fertilizer


I "made" $11K today thanks to "Wall Street". IF you lost 30%, how did
you fare today? Did you move it all to cash?

i work for a living. i dont have time to diddle my bank acct all day
like you do

You screwed up when you chose the wrong funds in your 401K.

me and the entire middle class. you keep blaming the middle class for
doing what the rich gave us. typical right wing bull****


No, Bob, my retirement portfolio was up $11K today.

so was mine. but it was down 75K last year. me and the whole middle
class.

I made no changes
or trades.

Your "middle class" diatribes boor me.

yeah i know. nothing bores you like the truth