"Califbill" wrote in message
...


"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 22:24:41 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:44:57 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:



the North controlled some southern states by then. But the fear was
antislavery, but not slavery per se. Hell, only 26% of North Carolina
family's owned slaves. And some slave owners were black. Imagine
that.

didnt matter. the perception of the right to own slaves was more
important than slavery. and almost no blacks owned slaves


And a majority of the whites did not own slaves. Imagine the states
telling
the Federal government these days to observe the rights of states.

so you're pro slavery? gee. i would never have guessed.

no wonder you hate obama. you object to him not being property


You dumb F@ck. You state the war was about slavery. It was about
economics and states rights. Even Lincoln stated he would not free the
slaves if it saved the Union. You are a racist of the first order.
Anybody saying anything about Obama that is negative, you run to the
racist rant. F@uk you. You are an idiot and will always be stupid and
broke. When Obama or the next Administration decides to raise taxes on
the "rich", I will laugh my ass off, when you find out you and the wife
are rich. And my great Grandfather was wounded fighting as an Ohio
Regular. Fought on the side of the Union. You probably do not even know
a person of color, any color, as a friend.

It was about five main things, three of which were regarding slavery, two of
which were economics and states rights. If you're going to call someone a
racist, please have some basis in fact.