On 9-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote:

I finally think you're right on one count based upon your "logic" - too
bad
the constitution doesn't prohibit stupidity.

if it did, the GOP would disappear

The United States would disappear. As long as the non functional masses are
led by the nose to have childish battles over political syndicate names
(encouraged by the scum you elect and "news") Such mindless debate
successfully avoids the core subject matter, as you just proved.

On 9-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote:

If "the rich" (productive
people) got a 50% tax increase they'd leave in minutes, and the
unproductive
would have to fend for them selves. (you).

ah. the rich are productive. the middle class is not.

The middle class is gone (80%) for all time. Keep worshiping political
parasites and sending your money overseas.

How long will it take the former U.S. to adopt the economic policies and
philosophy of Japan, India, Korea and red China?

On 10-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote:

There is no money, that is the point.
The trillions that disappeared from the economy never existed in the
first place. It was just betting slips from those hedge fund bookies
like Soros.

soros was peanuts compared to the 11 TRILLION sucked out of the
economy by wall street hedgefund managers

That's his/her point - mystery paper is worthless when the bogus house of
cards collapses. Production creates actual wealth; hyperinflation of real
estate and paper wagers do not. It had to collapse, it did, and it cannot be
regenerated.

In article ,
says...

On 9-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote:

I finally think you're right on one count based upon your "logic" - too
bad
the constitution doesn't prohibit stupidity.

if it did, the GOP would disappear

The United States would disappear. As long as the non functional masses are
led by the nose to have childish battles over political syndicate names
(encouraged by the scum you elect and "news") Such mindless debate
successfully avoids the core subject matter, as you just proved.

It really gets me when retards like pubichair there spew the same lies,
over and over again, and consider it "intelligent debate". What I don't
understand is how with subjects so important to our future, folks like
he and Harry and the kind of people who run acorn, elected Franken,
etc.. can so intentionally lie and cheat and have no conscience or
remorse.

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese!

On 10-Aug-2010, "Harry @ news.east.earthlink.net"
wrote:

actually complete retirement and not outlive their money simply
because the boomers covered them with our 401k and FICA money.
There are not enough kids behind us to support 75-80 million boomers
on a pension.

Amen brother.


Sure there is. We simply have to re-order our priorities. For starters,
we can cut the military budget in half as soon as employment picks up.
That would represent a savings of what, at least $400 billion dollars?

As asinine as that comment is, it makes sense in a strange way considering
the bedwetters you elect won't use them anyway for anything but delivering
food baskets to the enemy.

On 8/12/10 10:00 AM, I am Tosk wrote:

It really gets me when retards...

You should stop right there, since you are the ranking retard here.

On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:51:39 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 10-Aug-2010, wrote:

aint free enterprise wonderful? almost sounds like you're arguing for
govt control of healthcare!


In this case it IS government health care (Medicare)

ever hear of blue cross? aetna? kaiser? they're not medicare


The 60 minutes story and the end of life problem in general, is a
Medicare problem.

It's a moral problem. Forcing the feeble and soon to be dead to stay
temporarily, painfully alive is torture - euthanasia is applied to criminals
and pets - torturing old people to run up the bill is the ultimate crime.


and yet the christian right insists that this be done...look at terry
schiavo...go to 'find a grave'..see how many sick xtian *******s weep
over her while not giving a damn about children who die because of
malnutrition, lack of access to healthcare, etc.

euthanasia is a logical option IMHO...but the xtian right would never
go for it

On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:55:13 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 9-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote:

I finally think you're right on one count based upon your "logic" - too
bad
the constitution doesn't prohibit stupidity.

if it did, the GOP would disappear

The United States would disappear. As long as the non functional masses are
led by the nose to have childish battles over political syndicate names
(encouraged by the scum you elect and "news") Such mindless debate
successfully avoids the core subject matter, as you just proved.

let's see...the right wing teabaggers scream about hispanics
immigratin to america

while wall street sucks out the wealth of america...

you were saying?

On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 10:00:35 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 9-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote:

I finally think you're right on one count based upon your "logic" - too
bad
the constitution doesn't prohibit stupidity.

if it did, the GOP would disappear

The United States would disappear. As long as the non functional masses are
led by the nose to have childish battles over political syndicate names
(encouraged by the scum you elect and "news") Such mindless debate
successfully avoids the core subject matter, as you just proved.

It really gets me when retards like pubichair there spew the same lies,
over and over again, and consider it "intelligent debate". What I don't
understand is how with subjects so important to our future, folks like
he and Harry and the kind of people who run acorn, elected Franken,
etc.. can so intentionally lie and cheat and have no conscience or
remorse.

says the guy who thinks mcconnell, vitters, jindal, etc. are great
politicians

On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:00:05 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 10-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote:

There is no money, that is the point.
The trillions that disappeared from the economy never existed in the
first place. It was just betting slips from those hedge fund bookies
like Soros.

soros was peanuts compared to the 11 TRILLION sucked out of the
economy by wall street hedgefund managers

That's his/her point - mystery paper is worthless when the bogus house of
cards collapses. Production creates actual wealth; hyperinflation of real
estate and paper wagers do not. It had to collapse, it did, and it cannot be
regenerated.

and the free market fundamentalists, with their right wing
mythology...are just amazed when it blows up in their faces