"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message
...

On 2-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

The middle class hasn't had a raise and wages have been seriously
downgraded, actually, (unless minimum wage at Walmart is "the new
middle
class") due to the blind willingness of "Americans" to buy everything
foreign.

I'm willing to be that you've never experienced real racism or
discrimination. So, it's unlikely you have the expertise to lecture
others.
The fact is that several people here are openly racist. They can't get
past
the fact that Obama was actually elected by the majority of the voters
and

that McCain imploded.

Using that rationale, everyone that didn't like Bush was a racist also
because he was Caucasian. You have a serious problem with elementary
definitions.

Not sure how you define rationale, since what you're claiming is right out
of a mental institution.

On 3-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

Using that rationale, everyone that didn't like Bush was a racist also
because he was Caucasian. You have a serious problem with elementary
definitions.

Not sure how you define rationale, since what you're claiming is right out

of a mental institution.

Exact same rationale for my analogy - the loons think anyone disagreeing
with Obama is racist because he's half black. It MUST be racist if
vilifying Bush because he's ALL cracker.

It's YOUR premise, not mine.

On 8/3/10 6:33 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:
On 3-Aug-2010, wrote:

Using that rationale, everyone that didn't like Bush was a racist also
because he was Caucasian. You have a serious problem with elementary
definitions.

Not sure how you define rationale, since what you're claiming is right out

of a mental institution.

Exact same rationale for my analogy - the loons think anyone disagreeing
with Obama is racist because he's half black. It MUST be racist if
vilifying Bush because he's ALL cracker.

It's YOUR premise, not mine.


Do you look over your screeds before you post them?



--
The stupider you sound, the more Republican votes you'll get.

"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message
...

On 3-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

Using that rationale, everyone that didn't like Bush was a racist also
because he was Caucasian. You have a serious problem with elementary
definitions.

Not sure how you define rationale, since what you're claiming is right
out

of a mental institution.

Exact same rationale for my analogy - the loons think anyone disagreeing
with Obama is racist because he's half black. It MUST be racist if
vilifying Bush because he's ALL cracker.

It's YOUR premise, not mine.

No it isn't. Obama has been criticized quite rightly more than a few times
by the left. But, of course, Bush did nothing wrong. Perhaps it's time to
get back on your meds?

On 3-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

Exact same rationale for my analogy - the loons think anyone disagreeing
with Obama is racist because he's half black. It MUST be racist if
vilifying Bush because he's ALL cracker.

It's YOUR premise, not mine.

No it isn't. Obama has been criticized quite rightly more than a few times

by the left. But, of course, Bush did nothing wrong. Perhaps it's time to
get back on your meds?

Now you clowns don't even perceive when you're agreeing.

Clinton, Bush, Obama and the purchasing habits of the nitwits inhabiting the
space between Canada and Mexico brought the U.S. to its knees, following a
long period (since the mid 70's) of slow, gradual decline. The decline was
further enhanced by mindless ass kissing of a political crime syndicate my
the fat, happy and stupid. (Reference, the elections of 1992, 1994, 1996,
1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008)

Natural selection cannot be circumvented..

On 8/4/10 3:05 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:
On 3-Aug-2010, wrote:

Exact same rationale for my analogy - the loons think anyone disagreeing
with Obama is racist because he's half black. It MUST be racist if
vilifying Bush because he's ALL cracker.

It's YOUR premise, not mine.

No it isn't. Obama has been criticized quite rightly more than a few times

by the left. But, of course, Bush did nothing wrong. Perhaps it's time to
get back on your meds?

Now you clowns don't even perceive when you're agreeing.

Clinton, Bush, Obama and the purchasing habits of the nitwits inhabiting the
space between Canada and Mexico brought the U.S. to its knees, following a
long period (since the mid 70's) of slow, gradual decline. The decline was
further enhanced by mindless ass kissing of a political crime syndicate my
the fat, happy and stupid. (Reference, the elections of 1992, 1994, 1996,
1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008)

Natural selection cannot be circumvented..


You see about as stupid as Canuck...you two related?

On 4-Aug-2010, ?B?SGFycnkg76O/?= wrote:

Now you clowns don't even perceive when you're agreeing.

Clinton, Bush, Obama and the purchasing habits of the nitwits inhabiting
the
space between Canada and Mexico brought the U.S. to its knees, following
a
long period (since the mid 70's) of slow, gradual decline. The decline
was
further enhanced by mindless ass kissing of a political crime syndicate
my
the fat, happy and stupid. (Reference, the elections of 1992, 1994,
1996,
1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008)

Natural selection cannot be circumvented..


You see about as stupid as Canuck...you two related?

Government "employee" or union member?

On 8/4/10 4:02 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:
On 4-Aug-2010, wrote:

Now you clowns don't even perceive when you're agreeing.

Clinton, Bush, Obama and the purchasing habits of the nitwits inhabiting
the
space between Canada and Mexico brought the U.S. to its knees, following
a
long period (since the mid 70's) of slow, gradual decline. The decline
was
further enhanced by mindless ass kissing of a political crime syndicate
my
the fat, happy and stupid. (Reference, the elections of 1992, 1994,
1996,
1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008)

Natural selection cannot be circumvented..


You seem about as stupid as Canuck...you two related?

Government "employee" or union member?

Canuck hasn't the skills to be either.

In article ,
says...

On 8/4/10 3:05 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:
On 3-Aug-2010, wrote:

Exact same rationale for my analogy - the loons think anyone disagreeing
with Obama is racist because he's half black. It MUST be racist if
vilifying Bush because he's ALL cracker.

It's YOUR premise, not mine.

No it isn't. Obama has been criticized quite rightly more than a few times

by the left. But, of course, Bush did nothing wrong. Perhaps it's time to
get back on your meds?

Now you clowns don't even perceive when you're agreeing.

Clinton, Bush, Obama and the purchasing habits of the nitwits inhabiting the
space between Canada and Mexico brought the U.S. to its knees, following a
long period (since the mid 70's) of slow, gradual decline. The decline was
further enhanced by mindless ass kissing of a political crime syndicate my
the fat, happy and stupid. (Reference, the elections of 1992, 1994, 1996,
1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008)

Natural selection cannot be circumvented..


You see about as stupid as Canuck...you two related?

Oh, little buddy!!?? Here's a typo for you to ferret out!

--
The stupider you sound, the more Republican votes you'll get