wrote in message
...
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 17:19:03 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

Sure... whatever. Let me guess, it's time to abolish the Dept. of Edu.
Everyone is stupid, everyone is a loser... except you of course.

You have brought this up out of the blue in several threads. Why don't
you explain to us what the DoE actually does to educate kids?
Around here the authority is all in the county school board. The state
really doesn't even have that much control over curriculum and
compared to our local ad valorem taxes, all other input of money is
inconsequential.

DoE really just looks like another big federal bureaucracy that
doesn't do much. Just because it has the word "education" in it,
people think it is sacred. This used to be part of HEW (before Carter)
and that seemed to work fine ... back when the school system actually
worked. We have higher graduation rates but I am not convinced that a
lot of the kids graduating were actually performing at the 12th grade
... or even the 9th grade level. All the feds did was to get the
schools to play games with their numbers and teach to the tests.

I don't have to. Go look at the website and see if you can figure it out.

On 3-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

Government schools ARE federal indoctrination centers. Do you think
"public"
schools reap in the money and do what they want??? Ever wonder why your
kids are fools too? It's not all genetic.

Sure... whatever. Let me guess, it's time to abolish the Dept. of Edu.
Everyone is stupid, everyone is a loser... except you of course.

That's pretty much correct.

Yes, the Dept. of Education and everything else contrary to the constitution
needs to be abolished.

On 3-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

Exact same rationale for my analogy - the loons think anyone disagreeing
with Obama is racist because he's half black. It MUST be racist if
vilifying Bush because he's ALL cracker.

It's YOUR premise, not mine.

No it isn't. Obama has been criticized quite rightly more than a few times

by the left. But, of course, Bush did nothing wrong. Perhaps it's time to
get back on your meds?

Now you clowns don't even perceive when you're agreeing.

Clinton, Bush, Obama and the purchasing habits of the nitwits inhabiting the
space between Canada and Mexico brought the U.S. to its knees, following a
long period (since the mid 70's) of slow, gradual decline. The decline was
further enhanced by mindless ass kissing of a political crime syndicate my
the fat, happy and stupid. (Reference, the elections of 1992, 1994, 1996,
1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008)

Natural selection cannot be circumvented..

On 8/4/10 3:05 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:
On 3-Aug-2010, wrote:

Exact same rationale for my analogy - the loons think anyone disagreeing
with Obama is racist because he's half black. It MUST be racist if
vilifying Bush because he's ALL cracker.

It's YOUR premise, not mine.

No it isn't. Obama has been criticized quite rightly more than a few times

by the left. But, of course, Bush did nothing wrong. Perhaps it's time to
get back on your meds?

Now you clowns don't even perceive when you're agreeing.

Clinton, Bush, Obama and the purchasing habits of the nitwits inhabiting the
space between Canada and Mexico brought the U.S. to its knees, following a
long period (since the mid 70's) of slow, gradual decline. The decline was
further enhanced by mindless ass kissing of a political crime syndicate my
the fat, happy and stupid. (Reference, the elections of 1992, 1994, 1996,
1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008)

Natural selection cannot be circumvented..


You see about as stupid as Canuck...you two related?

On 4-Aug-2010, ?B?SGFycnkg76O/?= wrote:

Now you clowns don't even perceive when you're agreeing.

Clinton, Bush, Obama and the purchasing habits of the nitwits inhabiting
the
space between Canada and Mexico brought the U.S. to its knees, following
a
long period (since the mid 70's) of slow, gradual decline. The decline
was
further enhanced by mindless ass kissing of a political crime syndicate
my
the fat, happy and stupid. (Reference, the elections of 1992, 1994,
1996,
1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008)

Natural selection cannot be circumvented..


You see about as stupid as Canuck...you two related?

Government "employee" or union member?

On 8/4/10 4:02 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:
On 4-Aug-2010, wrote:

Now you clowns don't even perceive when you're agreeing.

Clinton, Bush, Obama and the purchasing habits of the nitwits inhabiting
the
space between Canada and Mexico brought the U.S. to its knees, following
a
long period (since the mid 70's) of slow, gradual decline. The decline
was
further enhanced by mindless ass kissing of a political crime syndicate
my
the fat, happy and stupid. (Reference, the elections of 1992, 1994,
1996,
1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008)

Natural selection cannot be circumvented..


You seem about as stupid as Canuck...you two related?

Government "employee" or union member?

Canuck hasn't the skills to be either.

In article ,
says...

On 8/4/10 3:05 PM, Colonel Kurtz wrote:
On 3-Aug-2010, wrote:

Exact same rationale for my analogy - the loons think anyone disagreeing
with Obama is racist because he's half black. It MUST be racist if
vilifying Bush because he's ALL cracker.

It's YOUR premise, not mine.

No it isn't. Obama has been criticized quite rightly more than a few times

by the left. But, of course, Bush did nothing wrong. Perhaps it's time to
get back on your meds?

Now you clowns don't even perceive when you're agreeing.

Clinton, Bush, Obama and the purchasing habits of the nitwits inhabiting the
space between Canada and Mexico brought the U.S. to its knees, following a
long period (since the mid 70's) of slow, gradual decline. The decline was
further enhanced by mindless ass kissing of a political crime syndicate my
the fat, happy and stupid. (Reference, the elections of 1992, 1994, 1996,
1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008)

Natural selection cannot be circumvented..


You see about as stupid as Canuck...you two related?

Oh, little buddy!!?? Here's a typo for you to ferret out!

--
The stupider you sound, the more Republican votes you'll get

On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 18:57:52 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 3-Aug-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

Government schools ARE federal indoctrination centers. Do you think
"public"
schools reap in the money and do what they want??? Ever wonder why your
kids are fools too? It's not all genetic.

Sure... whatever. Let me guess, it's time to abolish the Dept. of Edu.
Everyone is stupid, everyone is a loser... except you of course.

That's pretty much correct.

Yes, the Dept. of Education and everything else contrary to the constitution
needs to be abolished.

god only knows why he thinks it's contrary to the constitution. the
tea baggers seem to have a different version of that than the founding
fathers did

On 4-Aug-2010, bpuharic wrote:

Sure... whatever. Let me guess, it's time to abolish the Dept. of Edu.
Everyone is stupid, everyone is a loser... except you of course.

That's pretty much correct.

Yes, the Dept. of Education and everything else contrary to the
constitution
needs to be abolished.

god only knows why he thinks it's contrary to the constitution. the
tea baggers seem to have a different version of that than the founding
fathers did

In case you don't even have a fleeting familiarity with the constitution, it
defines what functions the federal government is allowed to perform. MOST
of what the federal government does is contrary to the constitution, so in a
way, you are correct. The constitution over the past 50 years applies
primarily to criminals and perverts.

On 4-Aug-2010, ?B?SGFycnkg76O/?= wrote:

Natural selection cannot be circumvented..


You seem about as stupid as Canuck...you two related?

Government "employee" or union member?

Canuck hasn't the skills to be either.

DMV??????