On 16-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

The government NEVER invests

WRONG. who developed the internet? the PC? who developed UC berkeley,
one of the finest schools in the world?

Look up the word investment

you're simply a sheep in a right wing herd

(clinton used that term intentionally out of
context and the ass holes agreed). ****ing money down the drain for
studies
of how to wash your dick in Obama's homeland is not investment. Neither
is
paying the grossly inflated bills of irresponsible sub governments. If
"the
government" sent you money to pay for your pay television bill, it's not
an
investment, it's a waste. About 60% of what government is ****ing away
is
potential investment. It's your money, so who cares what they do???

gee. and wall street just sucked 11 TRILLION out of the economy in 3
years.

so tell me how efficient THAT was

"Wall Street," with which I have no activity or interest, paid back the
money that you still owe "the government." Cooincidently they didn't send
trillions overseas as you did, and continue to do.

On 13-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

Apparently "the rich" (economic penis envy) did something better than
you.

yeah. they steal better than i do.

What (specifically!) was stolen from you. Use nouns, not mindless gibberish
you saw lipflapped on the idiot box.


Nothing is constraining you except lack of drive and ambition - squealing
for handouts will get you nothing.

you believe the fairy tale that wall street is of god and never
steals, cheats or lies.

I've told the mindless class for 30+ years "Wall Street" is wagering. You
should know that. "Money" on paper wagers is bogus. Hard, tangible assets
are all that counts. No money has been lost in "the economy;" only your
paper promises for money which never existed. "Wall streeters" are
primarily parasites.


you also believe in santa claus

I was always hot for Betty Boop, too.


You shouldn't call the jackass in the White House a darkie, he's half
cracker.

his race is irrelevant to me. to you it's the only thing that matters

YOU called him a darkie! Hitting the sauce this early in the day?

"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message
...

On 16-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

Investment income is taxed at a lower rate to encourage investment,

which it does not do. we have lowered the tax rates on investment
income to 15%

Only for 3 more months - then you're "retirement" is screwed even deeper.

The lowest tax rate now is 10% - it will rise 50% on January 1, 2011.
That
makes them equivalent.(50% tax rate increased on the lowest wage
losers???)
Higher tax rates go as high as 40%, at a moderate incom,e. That's lower.
Arithmetic impaired??

It almost certainly won't. The Republicans don't want to allow the rate to
rise for the top 2% in income. They claim, falsely, that actual small
business would be hit.

The Republicans and the Teabaggers claim they want to reduce the deficit,
yet they have no problem adding another $3T to it with tax breaks for the
rich.

It's bad enough that the deficit will increase with the tax breaks for the
middle and lower income groups, but at this point, there's little choice,
since raising their taxes would do much greater harm.


Don't beat yourself up for not understanding grade school economics.

Sounds like you're not really getting what's actually going on.

"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message
...

On 16-Sep-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

Education is substantially by "the government," which explains most of
the
stupidity of the voting and purchasing public.

Really? Or, is it substantially by caring, intelligent teachers. Oh wait,
a
lot of them are represented by a union! Sorry!

You should be.........

You _are_ an idiot.

On 22-Sep-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

Higher tax rates go as high as 40%, at a moderate incom,e. That's
lower.
Arithmetic impaired??

It almost certainly won't. The Republicans don't want to allow the rate to

rise for the top 2% in income. They claim, falsely, that actual small
business would be hit.

The Republicans and the Teabaggers claim they want to reduce the deficit,
yet they have no problem adding another $3T to it with tax breaks for the
rich.

It's bad enough that the deficit will increase with the tax breaks for the

middle and lower income groups, but at this point, there's little choice,
since raising their taxes would do much greater harm.

You missed your career in writing children's books. Do you have even a tiny
grasp that ****ing trillions of dollars down the drain is the opposite side
of the T chart? It's your money - if you want it in the hands of the DC
criminals, send it to them.

On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:27:23 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 16-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

Education is substantially by "the government," which explains most of
the
stupidity of the voting and purchasing public.

i agree. conservatives outnumber liberals by 2:1

you have point

Watching the idiot box and joining up with the "conservative" "liberal"
distraction is dysfunctional. Ever seen a newspaper other than the rag
published where you live? D v R is equally asinine. You're stuck in cartoon
land.

anytime a right winger talks about someone else living in cartoon
land, it gives me a belly laugh

On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:34:58 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 16-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

The government NEVER invests

WRONG. who developed the internet? the PC? who developed UC berkeley,
one of the finest schools in the world?

Look up the word investment

govt investment. thanks. i already knew that


you're simply a sheep in a right wing herd

(clinton used that term intentionally out of
context and the ass holes agreed). ****ing money down the drain for
studies
of how to wash your dick in Obama's homeland is not investment. Neither
is
paying the grossly inflated bills of irresponsible sub governments. If
"the
government" sent you money to pay for your pay television bill, it's not
an
investment, it's a waste. About 60% of what government is ****ing away
is
potential investment. It's your money, so who cares what they do???

gee. and wall street just sucked 11 TRILLION out of the economy in 3
years.

so tell me how efficient THAT was

"Wall Street," with which I have no activity or interest, paid back the
money that you still owe "the government."

really? got any proof?

Cooincidently they didn't send
trillions overseas as you did, and continue to do.

as do you since you're a right winger and believe the middle class
should be destroyed

On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:24:52 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 16-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

Investment income is taxed at a lower rate to encourage investment,

which it does not do. we have lowered the tax rates on investment
income to 15%

Only for 3 more months - then you're "retirement" is screwed even deeper.

meaningless

The lowest tax rate now is 10% - it will rise 50% on January 1, 2011.

so 15%. wow. big deal. i'm paying 28%. they pay half of what i do.



and why should INVESTMENT income be treated differently than EARNED
income?

Read previous post, look up the big words. Have you invested in anything
other than foreign trinkets and lottery tickets? )Thise weren't
investments, for the thinking impaired.)

gee. how well's your theory working out NOW?? employment at 4%?

oh. your view ****ed the middle class and enriched the already rich

thanks. i already knew that.



it shouldn't. it leads to increasing wealth concentrated in fewer and
few hands...which is what's happening to america today

Seemingly increased wealth in "the few" (MORE millionaires and billionaires
than EVER in North America, including a ******** like Mexico)

yeah we're becoming more like mexico. so we have more millionaires.
so what? what good does that do working people?

you right wingers think ONLY the rich are human beings.


) looks
causative because the middle class is devastated and continuing to shrink -

courtesy of your rich buddies...

explained why 40 times here - the gap is wider, and widening - what are you
going to do to change that? Elect a different set of political parasites???
That's right, bitch, send money overseas - it worked until now, right?

gee. unionized countries aren't having this problems. think that might
have something to do with it? only the US is the middle class being
wiped out while the rich are doing fine

yet you ignore this evidence. you can't handle it because you're
rightwing and cant think outside the box



so your argument is COMPLETELY wrong

Don't beat yourself up for not understanding grade school economics.

let me know when you catch up

On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:53:57 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 13-Sep-2010, bpuharic wrote:

Apparently "the rich" (economic penis envy) did something better than
you.

yeah. they steal better than i do.

What (specifically!) was stolen from you. Use nouns, not mindless gibberish
you saw lipflapped on the idiot box.

reading comprehension is not a strength of yours, i see.

the entire middle class hasnt had a wage increase in almost 40 years.
yet you say that's just fine. think a decent wage should be paid to
the mddle class like they do in civilized countries?

oh. you don't. yo uthink it's fine the US middle class is being wiped
out.

any reason you hate the middle class? any reason you love a
plutocracy?



Nothing is constraining you except lack of drive and ambition - squealing
for handouts will get you nothing.

you believe the fairy tale that wall street is of god and never
steals, cheats or lies.

I've told the mindless class for 30+ years "Wall Street" is wagering.

meaningless

You
should know that. "Money" on paper wagers is bogus. Hard, tangible assets
are all that counts.

meaningless


You shouldn't call the jackass in the White House a darkie, he's half
cracker.

his race is irrelevant to me. to you it's the only thing that matters

YOU called him a darkie! Hitting the sauce this early in the day?

ROFLMAO!!! i didn't 'call' him a darkie. i made a sarcastic remark!!

HHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! you really ARE reading impaired

bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:27:23 GMT, "Colonel Kurtz"
wrote:


On 16-Sep-2010, wrote:


Education is substantially by "the government," which explains most of
the
stupidity of the voting and purchasing public.

i agree. conservatives outnumber liberals by 2:1

you have point

Watching the idiot box and joining up with the "conservative" "liberal"
distraction is dysfunctional. Ever seen a newspaper other than the rag
published where you live? D v R is equally asinine. You're stuck in cartoon
land.

anytime a right winger talks about someone else living in cartoon
land, it gives me a belly laugh


That would have that effect - on a moron.