Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 24 May 2010 07:36:05 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. gee. imagine if all the damage you did to your lungs by cigaret smoking happened only in a month... IOW you dont know what the hell you're talking about |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24/05/2010 4:08 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2010 07:36:05 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. gee. imagine if all the damage you did to your lungs by cigaret smoking happened only in a month... IOW you dont know what the hell you're talking about In reality, oil isn't as bad as you think to the environment. It is a naturally occuring substance and often leaks out anyway. Take the oil sands, if not mined out, it might just wash into the arctic. That being said, it isn't good to release that much at once. But unlike plastic bottles, cans, toilets, tires, boats, city garbage that still exists in the gulf 20-70 years after they are dumped, oil will only take a few years to disolve back into the environment. -- I would rather be a paid up Conservative nut job than a Liberal with no nuts, no job in debt and living off of other people like a leach. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 24 May 2010 18:49:08 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 24/05/2010 4:08 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 24 May 2010 07:36:05 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. gee. imagine if all the damage you did to your lungs by cigaret smoking happened only in a month... IOW you dont know what the hell you're talking about In reality, oil isn't as bad as you think to the environment. It is a naturally occuring substance and often leaks out anyway. Take the oil sands, if not mined out, it might just wash into the arctic. gee. we chemists think it's pretty bad. why? well for starters it has ALOT of chemical energy...benzene...other aromatic hydrocarbons that organisms can't digest. as to it's 'naturally occurring'...gee. if you take a teaspoon of cyanide, is that OK because it's not alot of cyanide? That being said, it isn't good to release that much at once. But unlike plastic bottles, cans, toilets, tires, boats, city garbage that still exists in the gulf 20-70 years after they are dumped, oil will only take a few years to disolve back into the environment. yeah. tell it to the fishermen who lost their jobs courtesy of the oil that doesn't affect anything |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Canuck57" wrote in message ... On 24/05/2010 4:08 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Mon, 24 May 2010 07:36:05 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. gee. imagine if all the damage you did to your lungs by cigaret smoking happened only in a month... IOW you dont know what the hell you're talking about In reality, oil isn't as bad as you think to the environment. It is a naturally occuring substance and often leaks out anyway. Take the oil sands, if not mined out, it might just wash into the arctic. That being said, it isn't good to release that much at once. But unlike plastic bottles, cans, toilets, tires, boats, city garbage that still exists in the gulf 20-70 years after they are dumped, oil will only take a few years to disolve back into the environment. -- I would rather be a paid up Conservative nut job than a Liberal with no nuts, no job in debt and living off of other people like a leach. As usual, you don't know your butt from a turd. The Valdez spill is STILL a disaster. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
silent drill team | General | |||
Drill here, drill now | General | |||
Drill Baby Drill!!! | General | |||
How to Drill Out a Broken Bolt? | General | |||
24V Firestorm drill | ASA |