Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "hk" wrote in message m... On 5/24/10 10:36 AM, Frogwatch wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms Are you ****ingcrazy? Yes, you are. -- Someone should administer a drug test on Froggy. |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/24/2010 11:33 AM, hk wrote:
On 5/24/10 11:26 AM, John H wrote: "When I die, bury me at WalMart so Harry will visit me." Now, *that* would get me to a walmart, to see if herring the racist is dead and to **** on his grave. And that could get you arrested too. Not that that would be a bad thing. The krause family seems to be plagued with deviant behavior. Did they ever catch up to your brother Ray Harry Krause? Originally from Florida but last seen in Maryland. There's a strong family resemblance so don't try to deny he's your Kin. |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/24/2010 1:02 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/24/10 12:50 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 24/05/2010 8:46 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. Didn't big mouth Obama say just a few weeks earlier to the start of the spill that he wanted more oil drilling? Did he not open up new tracts for that purpose? After all, DC is hungry for $$$ and developing ones own oil has a fantastic tax return for DC greedy overspending democrats. It's comical how the mindless right keeps trying to shift the blame for BP's screw-ups to the government. Didn't the gubmint turn a blind eye to some safety violations on BP's rigs? What's that all about? I smell a rat. A big greedy gubmint rat. |
#14
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
... Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Yeah, it's only the size of the Exxon spill every three days. Spill Baby Spill. |
#15
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
... On May 24, 10:36 am, Frogwatch wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. You're a raving lunatic! |
#16
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Canuck57" wrote in message
... On 24/05/2010 9:26 AM, John H wrote: On Mon, 24 May 2010 07:46:41 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. Not to be political, but that does hit the nail on the head. Does mean then Obama is bribable, so in either case Obama is a screwup. -- Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create wealth. In all cases, you're stupid. |
#17
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24/05/2010 11:02 AM, hk wrote:
On 5/24/10 12:50 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 24/05/2010 8:46 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. Didn't big mouth Obama say just a few weeks earlier to the start of the spill that he wanted more oil drilling? Did he not open up new tracts for that purpose? After all, DC is hungry for $$$ and developing ones own oil has a fantastic tax return for DC greedy overspending democrats. It's comical how the mindless right keeps trying to shift the blame for BP's screw-ups to the government. Governemnt is no different than a welfare dependant person like you or de-fumer. They want more money and provide nothing for it. -- Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create wealth. |
#18
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 24 May 2010 15:16:50 -0400, moose wrote:
On 5/24/2010 1:02 PM, hk wrote: On 5/24/10 12:50 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 24/05/2010 8:46 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. Didn't big mouth Obama say just a few weeks earlier to the start of the spill that he wanted more oil drilling? Did he not open up new tracts for that purpose? After all, DC is hungry for $$$ and developing ones own oil has a fantastic tax return for DC greedy overspending democrats. It's comical how the mindless right keeps trying to shift the blame for BP's screw-ups to the government. Didn't the gubmint turn a blind eye to some safety violations on BP's rigs? What's that all about? I smell a rat. A big greedy gubmint rat. Absolutely. Obama's folks have been in bed with BP from the gitgo. "BP and its employees have given more than $3.5 million to federal candidates over the past 20 years, with the largest chunk of their money going to Obama, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Donations come from a mix of employees and the company's political action committees - $2.89 million flowed to campaigns from BP-related PACs and about $638,000 came from individuals." http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64420A20100505 Of course, Reuters is just another right wing rag. -- John H "When I die, bury me at WalMart so Harry will visit me." |
#19
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John H" wrote in message ... On Mon, 24 May 2010 15:16:50 -0400, moose wrote: On 5/24/2010 1:02 PM, hk wrote: On 5/24/10 12:50 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 24/05/2010 8:46 AM, Frogwatch wrote: On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. Didn't big mouth Obama say just a few weeks earlier to the start of the spill that he wanted more oil drilling? Did he not open up new tracts for that purpose? After all, DC is hungry for $$$ and developing ones own oil has a fantastic tax return for DC greedy overspending democrats. It's comical how the mindless right keeps trying to shift the blame for BP's screw-ups to the government. Didn't the gubmint turn a blind eye to some safety violations on BP's rigs? What's that all about? I smell a rat. A big greedy gubmint rat. Absolutely. Obama's folks have been in bed with BP from the gitgo. "BP and its employees have given more than $3.5 million to federal candidates over the past 20 years, with the largest chunk of their money going to Obama, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Donations come from a mix of employees and the company's political action committees - $2.89 million flowed to campaigns from BP-related PACs and about $638,000 came from individuals." http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64420A20100505 Of course, Reuters is just another right wing rag. -- John H "When I die, bury me at WalMart so Harry will visit me." So, I guess you can't read... "over the past 20 years" is quite telling. Who were former oil men? Bush/Cheney. |
#20
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24/05/2010 1:29 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote: Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be problems. Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely. You're a raving lunatic! Obama only cares about power and his own arrogant ass. He still thinks he can big mouth BS his way out of it too. But more and more people are catching on that this president is a banana republic jack ass. -- Liberal diseases of debt, entitlement, envy and greed do not create wealth. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
silent drill team | General | |||
Drill here, drill now | General | |||
Drill Baby Drill!!! | General | |||
How to Drill Out a Broken Bolt? | General | |||
24V Firestorm drill | ASA |