On Mon, 24 May 2010 10:50:50 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/05/2010 8:46 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
On May 24, 10:36 am, wrote:
Obviously, this oil spill has caused very little damage so far in
spite of being huge. IN relative terms, it's damage is far smaller
than a single weeks worth of tourism. So far, I am totally
unimpressed by any damage from the spill and I think this will
actually cause technology to be developed for spills that would be
problems.

Of course when you have a foreign oil company bribing the Obama admin
to ignore normal requirements, bad things can happen. You play by
Chicago rules and the Gulf Coast gets hurt. Obama does not care about
anybody in the south, he completely ignored the spill until the media
jumped on it and then ignored Nashville compeltely.

Didn't big mouth Obama say just a few weeks earlier to the start of the
spill that he wanted more oil drilling? Did he not open up new tracts
for that purpose?

yep. guess he'll have to reconsider OR regulate the industry...which
bush never did


After all, DC is hungry for $$$ and developing ones own oil has a
fantastic tax return for DC greedy overspending democrats.

guess the moron doesn't know that 71% of all oil money goes tot he GOP

rush hasnt let him in on the secret