On May 5, 1:46*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
Or, more likely they're concerned about Obama's willingness to allow some
drilling, based on the pseudo claim that oil rigs are safe. If you're trying
to make the claim that Obama has more invested in Big Oil than the big oil
men Bush and Cheney, you've got a tough road ahead.

"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...
I have been wondering why the Obama admin seems to be panicking over
the BP oil spill. *Now it turns out that Obama was the recipient of
the largest amount of BP money. *According to the Washington Post,
here is what BP got in return:

"The Interior Department exempted BP’s calamitous Gulf of Mexico
drilling operation from a detailed environmental impact analysis last
year, according to government documents, after three reviews of the
area concluded that a massive oil spill was unlikely."

How 'bout that? *Anybody surprised?

Which is dirtier, the Obama admin or oil?
Corruption, corruption, coruption.

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On May 5, 1:46 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
Or, more likely they're concerned about Obama's willingness to allow some
drilling, based on the pseudo claim that oil rigs are safe. If you're
trying
to make the claim that Obama has more invested in Big Oil than the big oil
men Bush and Cheney, you've got a tough road ahead.

"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...
I have been wondering why the Obama admin seems to be panicking over
the BP oil spill. Now it turns out that Obama was the recipient of
the largest amount of BP money. According to the Washington Post,
here is what BP got in return:

"The Interior Department exempted BP’s calamitous Gulf of Mexico
drilling operation from a detailed environmental impact analysis last
year, according to government documents, after three reviews of the
area concluded that a massive oil spill was unlikely."

How 'bout that? Anybody surprised?

Which is dirtier, the Obama admin or oil?
Corruption, corruption, coruption.


I doubt that was a serious question, but big oil has been pushing the limits
for many decades. There's nothing particularly corrupt about the present
admin, esp. in comparison to previous admins.

On May 5, 4:40*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...
On May 5, 1:46 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



Or, more likely they're concerned about Obama's willingness to allow some
drilling, based on the pseudo claim that oil rigs are safe. If you're
trying
to make the claim that Obama has more invested in Big Oil than the big oil
men Bush and Cheney, you've got a tough road ahead.

"Frogwatch" wrote in message

....
I have been wondering why the Obama admin seems to be panicking over
the BP oil spill. Now it turns out that Obama was the recipient of
the largest amount of BP money. According to the Washington Post,
here is what BP got in return:

"The Interior Department exempted BP’s calamitous Gulf of Mexico
drilling operation from a detailed environmental impact analysis last
year, according to government documents, after three reviews of the
area concluded that a massive oil spill was unlikely."

How 'bout that? Anybody surprised?
Which is dirtier, the Obama admin or oil?
Corruption, corruption, coruption.

I doubt that was a serious question, but big oil has been pushing the limits
for many decades. There's nothing particularly corrupt about the present
admin, esp. in comparison to previous admins.

Obama getting paid off to allow drilling without the enviro impact
statement, this time he got caught

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On May 5, 4:40 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...
On May 5, 1:46 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



Or, more likely they're concerned about Obama's willingness to allow
some
drilling, based on the pseudo claim that oil rigs are safe. If you're
trying
to make the claim that Obama has more invested in Big Oil than the big
oil
men Bush and Cheney, you've got a tough road ahead.

"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...
I have been wondering why the Obama admin seems to be panicking over
the BP oil spill. Now it turns out that Obama was the recipient of
the largest amount of BP money. According to the Washington Post,
here is what BP got in return:

"The Interior Department exempted BP’s calamitous Gulf of Mexico
drilling operation from a detailed environmental impact analysis last
year, according to government documents, after three reviews of the
area concluded that a massive oil spill was unlikely."

How 'bout that? Anybody surprised?
Which is dirtier, the Obama admin or oil?
Corruption, corruption, coruption.

I doubt that was a serious question, but big oil has been pushing the
limits
for many decades. There's nothing particularly corrupt about the present
admin, esp. in comparison to previous admins.

Obama getting paid off to allow drilling without the enviro impact
statement, this time he got caught


Come on. When are you going to actually think for yourself... that's just
the rightwing bs machine.

On 05/05/2010 6:04 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On May 5, 4:40 pm, wrote:
wrote in message

...
On May 5, 1:46 pm, wrote:



Or, more likely they're concerned about Obama's willingness to allow some
drilling, based on the pseudo claim that oil rigs are safe. If you're
trying
to make the claim that Obama has more invested in Big Oil than the big oil
men Bush and Cheney, you've got a tough road ahead.

wrote in message

...
I have been wondering why the Obama admin seems to be panicking over
the BP oil spill. Now it turns out that Obama was the recipient of
the largest amount of BP money. According to the Washington Post,
here is what BP got in return:

"The Interior Department exempted BP’s calamitous Gulf of Mexico
drilling operation from a detailed environmental impact analysis last
year, according to government documents, after three reviews of the
area concluded that a massive oil spill was unlikely."

How 'bout that? Anybody surprised?
Which is dirtier, the Obama admin or oil?
Corruption, corruption, coruption.

I doubt that was a serious question, but big oil has been pushing the limits
for many decades. There's nothing particularly corrupt about the present
admin, esp. in comparison to previous admins.

Obama getting paid off to allow drilling without the enviro impact
statement, this time he got caught

Obama will talk more bull**** to get out of it. And it is amazing how
short the memories are of Obama supporters.

--
Are we being heard or are we a herd?

On Wed, 5 May 2010 17:04:34 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:



Obama getting paid off to allow drilling without the enviro impact
statement, this time he got caught


guess he's never heard of sarah palin...'drill, baby, drill'

the right has amnesia...or alzheimers...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On May 5, 1:46 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
Or, more likely they're concerned about Obama's willingness to allow some
drilling, based on the pseudo claim that oil rigs are safe. If you're
trying
to make the claim that Obama has more invested in Big Oil than the big
oil
men Bush and Cheney, you've got a tough road ahead.

"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...
I have been wondering why the Obama admin seems to be panicking over
the BP oil spill. Now it turns out that Obama was the recipient of
the largest amount of BP money. According to the Washington Post,
here is what BP got in return:

"The Interior Department exempted BP's calamitous Gulf of Mexico
drilling operation from a detailed environmental impact analysis last
year, according to government documents, after three reviews of the
area concluded that a massive oil spill was unlikely."

How 'bout that? Anybody surprised?

Which is dirtier, the Obama admin or oil?
Corruption, corruption, coruption.


I doubt that was a serious question, but big oil has been pushing the
limits for many decades. There's nothing particularly corrupt about the
present admin, esp. in comparison to previous admins.


snerk

......Charles........

On 05/05/2010 5:40 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On May 5, 1:46 pm, wrote:
Or, more likely they're concerned about Obama's willingness to allow some
drilling, based on the pseudo claim that oil rigs are safe. If you're
trying
to make the claim that Obama has more invested in Big Oil than the big oil
men Bush and Cheney, you've got a tough road ahead.

wrote in message

...
I have been wondering why the Obama admin seems to be panicking over
the BP oil spill. Now it turns out that Obama was the recipient of
the largest amount of BP money. According to the Washington Post,
here is what BP got in return:

"The Interior Department exempted BP’s calamitous Gulf of Mexico
drilling operation from a detailed environmental impact analysis last
year, according to government documents, after three reviews of the
area concluded that a massive oil spill was unlikely."

How 'bout that? Anybody surprised?

Which is dirtier, the Obama admin or oil?
Corruption, corruption, coruption.


I doubt that was a serious question, but big oil has been pushing the limits
for many decades. There's nothing particularly corrupt about the present
admin, esp. in comparison to previous admins.

Hardly, Obama has already out debt-spent Bush. Trouble is Bush took 8
years to do less damage than Obama in 15 months. And Obama lies far
much more.

Democrats, dripping wet corruption. Selling the USA down the river.
--
Are we being heard or are we a herd?

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 05/05/2010 5:40 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On May 5, 1:46 pm, wrote:
Or, more likely they're concerned about Obama's willingness to allow
some
drilling, based on the pseudo claim that oil rigs are safe. If you're
trying
to make the claim that Obama has more invested in Big Oil than the big
oil
men Bush and Cheney, you've got a tough road ahead.

wrote in message

...
I have been wondering why the Obama admin seems to be panicking over
the BP oil spill. Now it turns out that Obama was the recipient of
the largest amount of BP money. According to the Washington Post,
here is what BP got in return:

"The Interior Department exempted BP’s calamitous Gulf of Mexico
drilling operation from a detailed environmental impact analysis last
year, according to government documents, after three reviews of the
area concluded that a massive oil spill was unlikely."

How 'bout that? Anybody surprised?

Which is dirtier, the Obama admin or oil?
Corruption, corruption, coruption.


I doubt that was a serious question, but big oil has been pushing the
limits
for many decades. There's nothing particularly corrupt about the present
admin, esp. in comparison to previous admins.

Hardly, Obama has already out debt-spent Bush. Trouble is Bush took 8
years to do less damage than Obama in 15 months. And Obama lies far much
more.

Democrats, dripping wet corruption. Selling the USA down the river.
--
Are we being heard or are we a herd?


You're stupid and a liar.

On Wed, 05 May 2010 18:37:57 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:



Hardly, Obama has already out debt-spent Bush.

because bush destroyed the economy more than any president since the
29 crash

but you right wingers kinda forgot history...

Trouble is Bush took 8
years to do less damage than Obama in 15 months. And Obama lies far
much more.

ROFLMAO!! bush destroyed the economy!! it collapsed in 2007.

the right thinks obama's been president for 9 years


Democrats, dripping wet corruption. Selling the USA down the river.

gee. cheney met behind closed doors with exxon. gramm and his enron VP
wife wrote the law that gave us unregulated derivatives

how'd that work out?