Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Health care for the poor

"anon-e-moose" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
How to pay for it? Here is a good way, reduce federal salaries to the
same level as comparable pvt jobs saving roughly $100 billion each
year which would be used to finance health insurance for the poor.
Federal salaries are roughly 1.5X as high as comparable pvt jobs. Use
this data:
http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs041.htm#earnings
to arrive at the figure of about $49 billion directly saved and then
tack on another $49 billuion for benefits and pensions and then divide
by 10 million uninsured.



Yeah, we don't need to attact talented people to run the gov't, so don't
pay them very much. Makes a lot of sense.

You have similar effects as the ipecacuanha plant on normal thinking
people.

Sorry. I'm bozo binning you for health reasons. No offense?



Please don't read my posts... please!!

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default Health care for the poor

On 06/04/2010 11:31 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
How to pay for it? Here is a good way, reduce federal salaries to the
same level as comparable pvt jobs saving roughly $100 billion each
year which would be used to finance health insurance for the poor.
Federal salaries are roughly 1.5X as high as comparable pvt jobs. Use
this data:
http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs041.htm#earnings
to arrive at the figure of about $49 billion directly saved and then
tack on another $49 billuion for benefits and pensions and then divide
by 10 million uninsured.


Yeah, we don't need to attact talented people to run the gov't, so don't
pay them very much. Makes a lot of sense.

You have similar effects as the ipecacuanha plant on normal thinking
people.

Sorry. I'm bozo binning you for health reasons. No offense?



Please don't read my posts... please!!


Only if you don't read ours!

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Health care for the poor

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 06/04/2010 11:31 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
How to pay for it? Here is a good way, reduce federal salaries to the
same level as comparable pvt jobs saving roughly $100 billion each
year which would be used to finance health insurance for the poor.
Federal salaries are roughly 1.5X as high as comparable pvt jobs. Use
this data:
http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs041.htm#earnings
to arrive at the figure of about $49 billion directly saved and then
tack on another $49 billuion for benefits and pensions and then divide
by 10 million uninsured.


Yeah, we don't need to attact talented people to run the gov't, so
don't
pay them very much. Makes a lot of sense.

You have similar effects as the ipecacuanha plant on normal thinking
people.

Sorry. I'm bozo binning you for health reasons. No offense?



Please don't read my posts... please!!


Only if you don't read ours!

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.



Yeah, but that's my choice. You don't have a choice, apparently.

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 292
Default Health care for the poor

Canuck57 wrote:
On 06/04/2010 11:31 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

How to pay for it? Here is a good way, reduce federal salaries to the
same level as comparable pvt jobs saving roughly $100 billion each
year which would be used to finance health insurance for the poor.
Federal salaries are roughly 1.5X as high as comparable pvt jobs. Use
this data:
http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs041.htm#earnings
to arrive at the figure of about $49 billion directly saved and then
tack on another $49 billuion for benefits and pensions and then divide
by 10 million uninsured.


Yeah, we don't need to attact talented people to run the gov't, so
don't
pay them very much. Makes a lot of sense.

You have similar effects as the ipecacuanha plant on normal thinking
people.

Sorry. I'm bozo binning you for health reasons. No offense?



Please don't read my posts... please!!


Only if you don't read ours!

If the dingbat doesn't want us reading her dribble, why does she post it
in the first place?
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default Health care for the poor

On 05/04/2010 5:34 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
How to pay for it? Here is a good way, reduce federal salaries to the
same level as comparable pvt jobs saving roughly $100 billion each
year which would be used to finance health insurance for the poor.
Federal salaries are roughly 1.5X as high as comparable pvt jobs. Use
this data:
http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs041.htm#earnings
to arrive at the figure of about $49 billion directly saved and then
tack on another $49 billuion for benefits and pensions and then divide
by 10 million uninsured.


Good for starters. And then add a 20% surtax on all income only
refundable if you can show coverage for your family.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Health care for the poor

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 05/04/2010 5:34 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
How to pay for it? Here is a good way, reduce federal salaries to the
same level as comparable pvt jobs saving roughly $100 billion each
year which would be used to finance health insurance for the poor.
Federal salaries are roughly 1.5X as high as comparable pvt jobs. Use
this data:
http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs041.htm#earnings
to arrive at the figure of about $49 billion directly saved and then
tack on another $49 billuion for benefits and pensions and then divide
by 10 million uninsured.


Good for starters. And then add a 20% surtax on all income only
refundable if you can show coverage for your family.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.



No gov't intervention on your watch... no sir. Gov't is bad, keep out of my
wallet. Oh wait...

--
Nom=de=Plume


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How about that health care... Tom Francis - SWSports General 9 November 13th 09 07:10 PM
red states have poor health care wf3h General 1 October 10th 09 01:26 AM
Thank God for pvt health care Frogwatch General 31 September 6th 09 02:54 AM
Health Care [email protected] General 0 October 18th 08 01:05 AM
Health Care Eat Me, Trolls General 12 February 3rd 08 08:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017