nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
news
nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...


nom=de=plume wrote:


"Bill wrote in message
...



wrote in message
...



"Bill wrote in message
m...



wrote in message
...



"Bill wrote in message
m...



wrote in message
...



"Bill wrote in message
m...



wrote in message
...



wrote in message
...



nom=de=plume wrote:



"Bill wrote in message
m...




wrote in message
...




On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:






Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black
man
being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn
detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?




yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy
and
the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president




You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has
over
spent more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next
budget is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is
Proposing
over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President,
including Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due
tomorrow.
She will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no
pain due to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have
voted
for. We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected
representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over
spend.
We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then
get
full pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to
the
fire to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of
pensions
that
reward them as if they were royalty.





As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html






That report is 14 months old.





Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and
ruined
the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?

--
Nom=de=Plume




Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in
both
a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it
more
correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed
it
up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and
laying
the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.




"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take
effect until he was well into the position, and the results when
they
did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the
economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions.
But,
of
course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell
with
getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform
the
financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school
system. Just say no!

Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening.

--
Nom=de=Plume




The only reason the layoffs are slowing is at least 20% of the
workforce is out of work. Lots of the working at underemployed.
How
did that bank bailout help? Stopped foreclosures? Helped in loan
liquidity?



Really? The only reason. And you know this because you have some
inside
information? Or, more likely, you're listening to someone's talking
point.

--
Nom=de=Plume




Nope, I have an analytical brain. You have a brain?




So far, you haven't shown it in public.

--
Nom=de=Plume




And another brainless comment by nom-de-dum



And another demonstration of your lack of ability to cite facts.




You cite old news and incite other people with a lot of BS (cookie?).
Care to try to post on-topic once a day, at least?




Feel free to do the same. I cited an article but you have nothing to say
except it's old. Too bad for you!



Old *and* irrelevant. You should read these article _before_ you post
them.


You should read them and understand them before you comment on them... if
that's possible for you.


I did and it was OLD news.

"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
news
nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...


nom=de=plume wrote:


"Bill wrote in message
...



wrote in message
...



"Bill wrote in message
m...



wrote in message
...



"Bill wrote in message
m...



wrote in message
...



"Bill wrote in message
m...



wrote in message
...



wrote in message
...



nom=de=plume wrote:



"Bill wrote in
message
m...




wrote in message
...




On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600,
Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:






Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a
black
man
being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a
damn
detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?




yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy
and
the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president




You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has
over
spent more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's
next
budget is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is
Proposing
over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President,
including Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due
tomorrow.
She will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want
no
pain due to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have
voted
for. We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected
representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over
spend.
We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and
then
get
full pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet
to
the
fire to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of
pensions
that
reward them as if they were royalty.





As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html






That report is 14 months old.





Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and
ruined
the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?

--
Nom=de=Plume




Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in
both
a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it
more
correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has
screwed
it
up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and
laying
the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.




"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't
take
effect until he was well into the position, and the results
when
they
did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the
economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions.
But,
of
course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell
with
getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform
the
financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the
school
system. Just say no!

Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening.

--
Nom=de=Plume




The only reason the layoffs are slowing is at least 20% of the
workforce is out of work. Lots of the working at underemployed.
How
did that bank bailout help? Stopped foreclosures? Helped in
loan
liquidity?



Really? The only reason. And you know this because you have some
inside
information? Or, more likely, you're listening to someone's
talking
point.

--
Nom=de=Plume




Nope, I have an analytical brain. You have a brain?




So far, you haven't shown it in public.

--
Nom=de=Plume




And another brainless comment by nom-de-dum



And another demonstration of your lack of ability to cite facts.




You cite old news and incite other people with a lot of BS (cookie?).
Care to try to post on-topic once a day, at least?




Feel free to do the same. I cited an article but you have nothing to
say
except it's old. Too bad for you!



Old *and* irrelevant. You should read these article _before_ you post
them.


You should read them and understand them before you comment on them... if
that's possible for you.


I did and it was OLD news.


Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant or
comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"hk" wrote in message
m...
On 3/20/10 10:42 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Mar 20, 10:26 am, wrote:
On 3/20/10 9:57 AM, I am Tosk wrote:

Harry and his crew specialize in ripping off retirement funds from old
folks...
He probably should have gone to jail after Uuilco, who knows, maybe he
did. It
might explain why he never seems to get outside.

No pensioner or future pensioner lost a penny of pension or insurance
benefit with ULLICO managing or investing the funds, **** for brains. Of
course, you wouldn't understand that, having neither a pension or
insurance benefit in your name.

--

If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say:

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8)
Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 (or higher)

then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer.

Gee, that's not what a few seconds of Google searching turns
up......for instance:

http://www.m-f-d.org/article/finnamore/wz2rqr5y5hp.php

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/au...ulli-a29.shtml



Please highlight the passages in those articles that indicate the
pensioners or future pensioners or insurance patrons that lost a penny of
pension or insurance benefit, **** for brains...




--


If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say:

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8)
Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 (or higher)

then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer.


Any money ripped by the stewards reduces returns to the pensioners. Either
through direct loss, or the time value of the ripped money.

In article ,
says...

hk wrote:
On 3/19/10 9:03 PM, Larry wrote:
hk wrote:
On 3/19/10 5:10 PM, Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:18:33 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:




Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in
both
a
Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it
more
correct.
But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up
royally. His
spending is out of control, not helping and laying the
groundwork
for a huge
crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.

really? 25% unemployment looks good?

oh. i forgot. you're right wing. to the right wing, the middle
class
should ALWAYS get screwed



I am middle class, and my kids are middle class and they are
getting
screwed by this administration and the Wall Street you hate. How
come we still have all this unemployment and middle class with
little
spending money and Wall Street is giving out billions of
bucks in
bonus money?



Middle class huh? Maybe barely. Why don't you tell us about
all the
money you made on your patents? Then, you can claim I'm not a PA.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I did not make a lot of money on my patents. I made a lot of money
being a really good engineer and investing the money that I had by
living below my means.

Thus, you are middle class. Way to go. You show them rich folk.

--
Nom=de=Plume
\

Don't you wish you could have been a successful patent atty.

Don't you wish you could have made 1/4 of the money I made as one?

--
Nom=de=Plume


I doubt you made much. I doubt you were worth a **** as an attorney.
Probably suspended if you were ever an attorney.




Your doubts and five bucks will get you a cup of coffee at starbucks.
If that is too abstract for you...your doubts are worth...nothing.

Why the need to defend her, Harry? She is full of double talk and adds
nothing on-topic to this group.




I'm not defending anyone. I'm just a bit weary of the gang of
right-wing assholes here who gang up and pile on those whose opinions
differ from theirs. The gang of right-wing assholes includes Bill
McKee (aka bilious bill), herring the racist, scotty the stupid,
jackoff, and the bunch of ID spoofing-ID changing retardos, et cetera.
If any of them behaved the way they do here in any reasonable bar,
they'd be pounded into the pavement every other night by the regulars.

Calm down. This was a mild debate at best. No one is ganging up on anyone.

Harry has way more than a decade of making it up as he goes along here. He is
as dishonest as JPS, and vulgar as Slammer the panty sniffer. I would have
thought you would have all that by now.

Scotty

--
For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v

On 3/21/10 1:38 AM, CalifBill wrote:
wrote in message
m...
On 3/20/10 10:42 AM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Mar 20, 10:26 am, wrote:
On 3/20/10 9:57 AM, I am Tosk wrote:

Harry and his crew specialize in ripping off retirement funds from old
folks...
He probably should have gone to jail after Uuilco, who knows, maybe he
did. It
might explain why he never seems to get outside.

No pensioner or future pensioner lost a penny of pension or insurance
benefit with ULLICO managing or investing the funds, **** for brains. Of
course, you wouldn't understand that, having neither a pension or
insurance benefit in your name.

--

If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say:

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8)
Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 (or higher)

then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer.

Gee, that's not what a few seconds of Google searching turns
up......for instance:

http://www.m-f-d.org/article/finnamore/wz2rqr5y5hp.php

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/au...ulli-a29.shtml



Please highlight the passages in those articles that indicate the
pensioners or future pensioners or insurance patrons that lost a penny of
pension or insurance benefit, **** for brains...




--


If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say:

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8)
Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 (or higher)

then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer.


Any money ripped by the stewards reduces returns to the pensioners. Either
through direct loss, or the time value of the ripped money.




snerk Sorry, but you have no understanding of the situation there
at that time. Pensioners got and will continue to receive every penny,
same as those with life and/or health insurance.

On 3/21/10 4:55 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In articlep4OdnaSkAoTj9TjWnZ2dnUVZ_jMAAAAA@giganews. com,
says...

hk wrote:
On 3/19/10 9:03 PM, Larry wrote:
hk wrote:
On 3/19/10 5:10 PM, Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:18:33 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:




Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in
both
a
Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it
more
correct.
But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up
royally. His
spending is out of control, not helping and laying the
groundwork
for a huge
crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.

really? 25% unemployment looks good?

oh. i forgot. you're right wing. to the right wing, the middle
class
should ALWAYS get screwed



I am middle class, and my kids are middle class and they are
getting
screwed by this administration and the Wall Street you hate. How
come we still have all this unemployment and middle class with
little
spending money and Wall Street is giving out billions of
bucks in
bonus money?



Middle class huh? Maybe barely. Why don't you tell us about
all the
money you made on your patents? Then, you can claim I'm not a PA.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I did not make a lot of money on my patents. I made a lot of money
being a really good engineer and investing the money that I had by
living below my means.

Thus, you are middle class. Way to go. You show them rich folk.

--
Nom=de=Plume
\

Don't you wish you could have been a successful patent atty.

Don't you wish you could have made 1/4 of the money I made as one?

--
Nom=de=Plume


I doubt you made much. I doubt you were worth a **** as an attorney.
Probably suspended if you were ever an attorney.




Your doubts and five bucks will get you a cup of coffee at starbucks.
If that is too abstract for you...your doubts are worth...nothing.

Why the need to defend her, Harry? She is full of double talk and adds
nothing on-topic to this group.




I'm not defending anyone. I'm just a bit weary of the gang of
right-wing assholes here who gang up and pile on those whose opinions
differ from theirs. The gang of right-wing assholes includes Bill
McKee (aka bilious bill), herring the racist, scotty the stupid,
jackoff, and the bunch of ID spoofing-ID changing retardos, et cetera.
If any of them behaved the way they do here in any reasonable bar,
they'd be pounded into the pavement every other night by the regulars.

Calm down. This was a mild debate at best. No one is ganging up on anyone.

Harry has way more than a decade of making it up as he goes along here. He is
as dishonest as JPS, and vulgar as Slammer the panty sniffer. I would have
thought you would have all that by now.

Scotty


Speaking of right-wing assholes, here we have more b.s. from Scotty
Ingersoll, the unemployed, unemployable dipstick who hates the idea of
health care insurance reform, but sees nothing wrong with sticking a
local hospital with a bill for $25,000.

On 3/20/10 8:29 PM, Larry wrote:
hk wrote:
On 3/19/10 9:03 PM, Larry wrote:
hk wrote:
On 3/19/10 5:10 PM, Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:18:33 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:




Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in
both
a
Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it
more
correct.
But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up
royally. His
spending is out of control, not helping and laying the
groundwork
for a huge
crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.

really? 25% unemployment looks good?

oh. i forgot. you're right wing. to the right wing, the middle
class
should ALWAYS get screwed



I am middle class, and my kids are middle class and they are
getting
screwed by this administration and the Wall Street you hate. How
come we still have all this unemployment and middle class with
little
spending money and Wall Street is giving out billions of
bucks in
bonus money?



Middle class huh? Maybe barely. Why don't you tell us about
all the
money you made on your patents? Then, you can claim I'm not a PA.

--
Nom=de=Plume


I did not make a lot of money on my patents. I made a lot of money
being a really good engineer and investing the money that I had by
living below my means.

Thus, you are middle class. Way to go. You show them rich folk.

--
Nom=de=Plume
\

Don't you wish you could have been a successful patent atty.

Don't you wish you could have made 1/4 of the money I made as one?

--
Nom=de=Plume


I doubt you made much. I doubt you were worth a **** as an attorney.
Probably suspended if you were ever an attorney.




Your doubts and five bucks will get you a cup of coffee at starbucks.
If that is too abstract for you...your doubts are worth...nothing.

Why the need to defend her, Harry? She is full of double talk and adds
nothing on-topic to this group.




I'm not defending anyone. I'm just a bit weary of the gang of
right-wing assholes here who gang up and pile on those whose opinions
differ from theirs. The gang of right-wing assholes includes Bill
McKee (aka bilious bill), herring the racist, scotty the stupid,
jackoff, and the bunch of ID spoofing-ID changing retardos, et cetera.
If any of them behaved the way they do here in any reasonable bar,
they'd be pounded into the pavement every other night by the regulars.

Calm down. This was a mild debate at best. No one is ganging up on anyone.


You and the right-wing retards sure are...

On 3/20/10 8:36 PM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:27:46 -0400, wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...


nom=de=plume wrote:


wrote in message
...



nom=de=plume wrote:



"Bill wrote in message
m...




wrote in message
...




On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:






Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man
being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?




yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president




You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent
more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget
is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including
Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She
will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain
due
to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for.
We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected
representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get
full
pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire
to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that
reward them as if they were royalty.





As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html






That report is 14 months old.





Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the
economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?




I never said that. I've also never posted a political link - old or
current - to a boating group and I'm not going to start now.


You're right. You never said it. Yet, you claim it's "old" but won't
supply
something more recent. Not much of an argument in favor of your position.
You do have an opinion right?



Sure, but you will be very unhappy to hear that I don't think either side
has the right solutions all of the time. Lately the left has failed us
and your old news doesn't support it any longer.


Please show me where I said either side has all the solutions. Lately, the
"left" is not having the intestinal fortitude they should, but compared to
the previous admin., they're god-like.


That's insane.

I'm waiting for nincdepoop to jump into the pig semen thread with both feet.
Should be fun to watch.
--
John H



No piling on, eh, larry?

nom=de=plume wrote:


Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant or
comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose.


In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot -
including your dumb questions about navigation lights.

"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:


Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant
or
comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose.


In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot -
including your dumb questions about navigation lights.


Never asked any dumb question about lights. I made several statements.
However, I have seen a lot of your dumb posts, mostly about how everyone
else is wrong but you're always right. You must be brilliant.

--
Nom=de=Plume