On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:



The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.

On 3/9/10 6:29 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:



The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.


I would not dispute that there are many on the "wealthy right" who would
like to totally destroy the "worker class" in this country so they can
build a new worker class willing to work for peanuts, with virtually no
benefits...ala the Wal-Mart model. They'd like nothing better than a
return here to 19th Century employer-employee relationships, where the
employees are no better off than workers in China and much of the rest
of the Pacific Rim, India, Africa, and Central America. The wealthy
right, after all, doesn't think it is wealthy enough.

On 3/8/2010 1:41 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:



I'm sorry you're struggling. I'm sure the RNC would like your meager
donation, since you're a reactionary and they have a fear-based strategy.

Doesn't mater the reason, now is not a good time to be you.

Really? I'm doing just fine. Obviously you aren't. I'm sorry for you.

Q: What’s the difference between a shame and a pity?
A: If a busload of lawyers goes over a cliff, and there are no
survivors, that’s known as a pity. If there were any empty seats, that’s
a shame.

On 3/8/2010 1:42 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
?
--
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.


Yes, you "play it safe." No doubt about that. Except, not being very bright,
playing it safe means you don't get out much.

Isn't it a shame how 99% of the lawyers give the whole profession a bad name

On 3/9/10 6:48 AM, HK wrote:
On 3/8/2010 1:41 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:



I'm sorry you're struggling. I'm sure the RNC would like your meager
donation, since you're a reactionary and they have a fear-based
strategy.

Doesn't mater the reason, now is not a good time to be you.

Really? I'm doing just fine. Obviously you aren't. I'm sorry for you.

Q: What’s the difference between a shame and a pity?
A: If a busload of lawyers goes over a cliff, and there are no
survivors, that’s known as a pity. If there were any empty seats, that’s
a shame.


Spoofer active again. Too bad.

On 3/9/10 6:50 AM, HK wrote:
On 3/8/2010 1:42 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
?
--
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.


Yes, you "play it safe." No doubt about that. Except, not being very
bright,
playing it safe means you don't get out much.

Isn't it a shame how 99% of the lawyers give the whole profession a bad
name

Spoofer active again. Too bad.

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:


The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.

Why would anyone want to drive the unemployment rate up? Why would
anyone be angry that the middle class exists? You are talking pure
donkey****, just like Harry told you to.
I would think that business would want the consumer to be able to freely
spend...spend...spend. You don't see any advertising targeted to the
unemployed or down and out, do you?

On 3/9/2010 8:47 AM, anon-e-moose wrote:
bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:


The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.

Why would anyone want to drive the unemployment rate up? Why would
anyone be angry that the middle class exists? You are talking pure
donkey****, just like Harry told you to.
I would think that business would want the consumer to be able to freely
spend...spend...spend. You don't see any advertising targeted to the
unemployed or down and out, do you?

You stupid POS, if I say corporations want to eliminate middle class,
then it is true. I don't just make stuff up. I am a professional
writer, and we have standards.

On 3/9/10 9:33 AM, HK wrote:
On 3/9/2010 8:47 AM, anon-e-moose wrote:
bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:


The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.

Why would anyone want to drive the unemployment rate up? Why would
anyone be angry that the middle class exists? You are talking pure
donkey****, just like Harry told you to.
I would think that business would want the consumer to be able to freely
spend...spend...spend. You don't see any advertising targeted to the
unemployed or down and out, do you?

You stupid POS, if I say corporations want to eliminate middle class,
then it is true. I don't just make stuff up. I am a professional writer,
and we have standards.


Spoofer active again...too bad for rec.boats.


--


If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say:

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8)
Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3

then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer.

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:08:28 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:





Well, to give him credit, the chart at this site is pretty subtle.
Perhaps
it's too subtle for Canuck.

http://palatnikfactor.com/2010/02/06...resident-bush/

--
Nom=de=Plume


That chart showes that Obama's "Stimulus" has failed. Resolutely failed.
There are less jobs being lost each month because there are not that many
jobs being done. Show us a chart of the real unemployment.

really? creating 1.5M jobs is a failure?

oh, yes, i forgot. the right wing thinks that if it helps the middle
class, it's a failure. only programs that help the rich can be
successful

it's a matter of their fundamenalist faith



Creating what 1.5 million jobs? Please list a few. Semantics, or new speak
jobs maybe. Sending a bunch of bucks to the San Francisco Muni for bus
maintenance is considered "creating jobs". Keeping an overpaid,
incompetentently run government bureau in business is more like it.

San Francisco is facing a $350-750 million dollar deficit. This is a city
with about 800,000 residents. Prime example of most government entities
these days. Way over spending. At the low end, that is a $500 per
person deficit. The city buget is $6.6 billion bucks. That is over $8k per
resident. How the hell can a city spend that much per person and figure
that they will be solvent? This on top of state taxes, Federal taxes, and
having to put food on the table for the taxpayer.