On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:



The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.

On 3/9/10 6:29 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:



The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.


I would not dispute that there are many on the "wealthy right" who would
like to totally destroy the "worker class" in this country so they can
build a new worker class willing to work for peanuts, with virtually no
benefits...ala the Wal-Mart model. They'd like nothing better than a
return here to 19th Century employer-employee relationships, where the
employees are no better off than workers in China and much of the rest
of the Pacific Rim, India, Africa, and Central America. The wealthy
right, after all, doesn't think it is wealthy enough.

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:


The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.

Why would anyone want to drive the unemployment rate up? Why would
anyone be angry that the middle class exists? You are talking pure
donkey****, just like Harry told you to.
I would think that business would want the consumer to be able to freely
spend...spend...spend. You don't see any advertising targeted to the
unemployed or down and out, do you?

On 3/9/2010 8:47 AM, anon-e-moose wrote:
bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:


The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.

Why would anyone want to drive the unemployment rate up? Why would
anyone be angry that the middle class exists? You are talking pure
donkey****, just like Harry told you to.
I would think that business would want the consumer to be able to freely
spend...spend...spend. You don't see any advertising targeted to the
unemployed or down and out, do you?

You stupid POS, if I say corporations want to eliminate middle class,
then it is true. I don't just make stuff up. I am a professional
writer, and we have standards.

On 3/9/10 9:33 AM, HK wrote:
On 3/9/2010 8:47 AM, anon-e-moose wrote:
bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:


The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.

Why would anyone want to drive the unemployment rate up? Why would
anyone be angry that the middle class exists? You are talking pure
donkey****, just like Harry told you to.
I would think that business would want the consumer to be able to freely
spend...spend...spend. You don't see any advertising targeted to the
unemployed or down and out, do you?

You stupid POS, if I say corporations want to eliminate middle class,
then it is true. I don't just make stuff up. I am a professional writer,
and we have standards.


Spoofer active again...too bad for rec.boats.


--


If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say:

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8)
Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3

then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer.

On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:47:44 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:


The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.

yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.

Why would anyone want to drive the unemployment rate up?

-cheap labor
-to reinforce the fact they're rich and can do it

Why would
anyone be angry that the middle class exists? You are talking pure
donkey****, just like Harry told you to.

gee. look at mexico. why would 10 or 15 families rule the country
while tens of millions live in poverty?

you guys think this is a novel idea. it aint. as napoleon once said,
'religion is the only thing that keeps the poor from killing the rich'


I would think that business would want the consumer to be able to freely
spend...spend...spend. You don't see any advertising targeted to the
unemployed or down and out, do you?

if this is the case why hasnt the middle class had a pay increase in
10 years even though productivity has gone up 25%?

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:47:44 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:31:55 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:


The ship is still sinking but at a slower rate. Hot damn. That's
wonderful news.
yeah that can happen. in spite of right wing efforts to drive
unempolyment to 25%, they haven't succeeded. they're just angry the
middle class still exists.
Why would anyone want to drive the unemployment rate up?

-cheap labor
-to reinforce the fact they're rich and can do it

Why would
anyone be angry that the middle class exists? You are talking pure
donkey****, just like Harry told you to.

gee. look at mexico. why would 10 or 15 families rule the country
while tens of millions live in poverty?

you guys think this is a novel idea. it aint. as napoleon once said,
'religion is the only thing that keeps the poor from killing the rich'


I would think that business would want the consumer to be able to freely
spend...spend...spend. You don't see any advertising targeted to the
unemployed or down and out, do you?

if this is the case why hasnt the middle class had a pay increase in
10 years even though productivity has gone up 25%?


You have quite an imagination.

On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:30:21 -0500, anon-e-moose
wrote:

bpuharic wrote:


you guys think this is a novel idea. it aint. as napoleon once said,
'religion is the only thing that keeps the poor from killing the rich'


I would think that business would want the consumer to be able to freely
spend...spend...spend. You don't see any advertising targeted to the
unemployed or down and out, do you?

if this is the case why hasnt the middle class had a pay increase in
10 years even though productivity has gone up 25%?


You have quite an imagination.

and you have no information except the fairy tales of the right