"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 07/03/2010 10:52 PM, CalifBill wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:44:01 -0700,
wrote:

On 07/03/2010 7:17 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:48:33 -0700,
wrote:

got the same problem here.

. But
lets say you lived here all your life and have one. Then the tummy
hurts, call them up and they can see you in 4 weeks. So you wait 10
hours in emergency to find out you have appencitis.

and if you lose your job in the US? you NEVER get to see a doctor.

more proof that his solution is just to kill the middle class

I doubt you are middle class, just someone who doesn't like their new
station in life as a poor working class. If you work? You work?

yep. thinks that all working people are lazy...cant believe we
actually work


Since Obama and the corrupt Congress has spent much more than Bush even
thought of spending, you are never going to have money. And most of the
rest of us are going to be awfully short. His new budget proposes $1.6
Trillion more in debt. At the rate he and Congress are going by the end
of
next year, the cost to service the debt at present very low interest
rates
the cost will be $800 Billion bucks a year. And interest rates will
definitely be higher. What are you going to do then? There will be no
money for bailouts, no money for healthcare. The government if it is the
banker for healthcare, will just keep the money and meter out a minimum
of
heathcare. What has the stimulus accomplished? Other than keeping
overpaid
government workers on the payrole.

And likely less money for Social Security so the pain will be widespread.
And they don't see the rationed health care for governemtn profit
principle.

I am with you on this, but bpuharic and nom-du-plume types are clearly an
issue because they support Obama's madness. I am not sure if it is
selfishness or stupidity or both, but they sure follow the pied piper like
good little sheep.

One thing no Obamanite wants to realize is how much unemployment has Obama
debt-bailout spend cost in jobs?

Lets say I could start a business employing 1000 people. But I know my
wigits in this market have a price inflexability, I can't just pass on a
10% tax or wage hike for Obama debt and make it economically work. So I
play wait and see as if companies are taxed more or I have to lower wages
I get unionized or union issues, I can't afford it. So I play it safe and
do not invest.

Betch Obama doesn't want some independant think tank to look at the last
paragraph, as investing USA is on hold until the economics of Obama-debt
spend is realized. That is, who eats the shafting?
--
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.


Yes, you "play it safe." No doubt about that. Except, not being very bright,
playing it safe means you don't get out much.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 3/8/2010 1:42 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
?
--
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.


Yes, you "play it safe." No doubt about that. Except, not being very bright,
playing it safe means you don't get out much.

Isn't it a shame how 99% of the lawyers give the whole profession a bad name

On 3/9/10 6:50 AM, HK wrote:
On 3/8/2010 1:42 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
?
--
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.


Yes, you "play it safe." No doubt about that. Except, not being very
bright,
playing it safe means you don't get out much.

Isn't it a shame how 99% of the lawyers give the whole profession a bad
name

Spoofer active again. Too bad.