"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 15/02/2010 3:52 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 15/02/2010 2:19 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 15/02/2010 12:54 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...


Please read previous response.

Why do people like yourself automatically jump to the conclusion
that
a
statement of fact that may illuminate a broader influence on a
controversial subject means that the author of that statement is a
"rightie" or Bush supporter? This is exactly the type of current
political animosity that has divided this country. Now-a-days
you
are
either left or right apparently. There's no middle ground
anymore.

I have never "defended" Bush without reservation. I have, on
occasion,
expressed support for some of Obama's initiatives. I don't agree
with
much of how he is trying to accomplish them however.

The first step to getting this country back on track is to stop
the
stupid finger pointing.

Eisboch



If that's the case, why bring up something that was always obvious.
I
notice you didn't mention Bush the First's invasion either. Or,
Rumsfeld's or Cheney's previous involvement with Saddam. You didn't
mention the British establishing Iraq to begin with either. The
first
step to getting this country back on track is to be intellectually
honest.



Based on the few posts of yours that I have read, I would
respectfully
suggest that you lead the way.

Eisboch


Really? Please show me where I've done finger pointing without cause.
I've
been vilified here for being female, not "beautiful", "vacuous", a
"typical"
liberal (which I'm not even), told I'm not a patent attorney, a liar,
etc.
I've hardly ever even responded to those posters, especially not at
that
level.

Cause is in the eye of the beholder. Your cause isn't neccessarily
someone elses.


Stop acting so stupid. You're actually arguing with an adult.

There is no magic day you stop being a kid and become an adult. Human
observation only confirms it. We all look at out own viewpoint, and few
look beyond it. Your statement sounded sort of presumptious about
without
cause. Of course we all finger point. Human nature.

Have you reached the age of ascension ... mentally? What does "Your
statement sounded sort of presumptious about without cause" mean in
English?

Nope, don't think I have ascended. Mentally, yep, ever study Maslow?


You're at the physiological level. I get it.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:24:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 15/02/2010 3:52 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 15/02/2010 2:19 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 15/02/2010 12:54 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...


Please read previous response.

Why do people like yourself automatically jump to the conclusion
that
a
statement of fact that may illuminate a broader influence on a
controversial subject means that the author of that statement is a
"rightie" or Bush supporter? This is exactly the type of current
political animosity that has divided this country. Now-a-days
you
are
either left or right apparently. There's no middle ground
anymore.

I have never "defended" Bush without reservation. I have, on
occasion,
expressed support for some of Obama's initiatives. I don't agree
with
much of how he is trying to accomplish them however.

The first step to getting this country back on track is to stop
the
stupid finger pointing.

Eisboch



If that's the case, why bring up something that was always obvious.
I
notice you didn't mention Bush the First's invasion either. Or,
Rumsfeld's or Cheney's previous involvement with Saddam. You didn't
mention the British establishing Iraq to begin with either. The
first
step to getting this country back on track is to be intellectually
honest.



Based on the few posts of yours that I have read, I would
respectfully
suggest that you lead the way.

Eisboch


Really? Please show me where I've done finger pointing without cause.
I've
been vilified here for being female, not "beautiful", "vacuous", a
"typical"
liberal (which I'm not even), told I'm not a patent attorney, a liar,
etc.
I've hardly ever even responded to those posters, especially not at
that
level.

Cause is in the eye of the beholder. Your cause isn't neccessarily
someone elses.


Stop acting so stupid. You're actually arguing with an adult.

There is no magic day you stop being a kid and become an adult. Human
observation only confirms it. We all look at out own viewpoint, and few
look beyond it. Your statement sounded sort of presumptious about
without
cause. Of course we all finger point. Human nature.

Have you reached the age of ascension ... mentally? What does "Your
statement sounded sort of presumptious about without cause" mean in
English?

Nope, don't think I have ascended. Mentally, yep, ever study Maslow?


You're at the physiological level. I get it.

You should ask him if he's referring to Abraham or Elliott. My guess
is that he's an admirer of Lost.