D.Duck wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:21:51 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

Please read previous response.

Why do people like yourself automatically jump to the conclusion
that a statement of fact that may illuminate a broader influence
on a controversial subject means that the author of that
statement is a "rightie" or Bush supporter? This is exactly the
type of current political animosity that has divided this
country. Now-a-days you are either left or right apparently.
There's no middle ground anymore.

I have never "defended" Bush without reservation. I have, on
occasion, expressed support for some of Obama's initiatives. I
don't agree with much of how he is trying to accomplish them
however.

The first step to getting this country back on track is to stop
the stupid finger pointing.

Eisboch


If that's the case, why bring up something that was always
obvious. I notice you didn't mention Bush the First's invasion
either. Or, Rumsfeld's or Cheney's previous involvement with
Saddam. You didn't mention the British establishing Iraq to begin
with either. The first step to getting this country back on track
is to be intellectually honest.


Based on the few posts of yours that I have read, I would
respectfully suggest that you lead the way.

Eisboch

Really? Please show me where I've done finger pointing without
cause. I've been vilified here for being female, not "beautiful",
"vacuous", a "typical" liberal (which I'm not even), told I'm not a
patent attorney, a liar, etc. I've hardly ever even responded to
those posters, especially not at that level.

No offense, but I don't have a clue who you are, what you are
professionally, what you look like or if you are male or female, nor
to I care. I've only read a handful of your posts. My take is that
your mind is pretty well made up about anything and everything.
Maybe wrong, but that's the impression I have.

Carry on. Didn't mean to interrupt. I have other things to do.

Eisboch

I expect most of what "things" you have to do, include being an ass.

You're more likely than Plume to be disagreeable while you disagree.


Eisboch is probably the most knowledgeable, level headed and caring
persons that dares post in this group. Of course you and a couple
others won't agree but that's to be expected.

Yup. Richard is too good for this group. And too much a gentleman.
He should stay away.
You are also a gentleman, so you should butt out.
Just saying it like it is.
Leave the group to those of us who know how to handle the lib scum.
These times of national crisis are not the times for reasonable men.
The tree of Freedom sometimes needs the watering of the blood of patriots.

***Are you better off than you were FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS ago?***