On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:33:39 -0600, Jim wrote:

D.Duck wrote:
jps wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:21:51 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

Please read previous response.

Why do people like yourself automatically jump to the conclusion
that a statement of fact that may illuminate a broader influence
on a controversial subject means that the author of that
statement is a "rightie" or Bush supporter? This is exactly the
type of current political animosity that has divided this
country. Now-a-days you are either left or right apparently.
There's no middle ground anymore.

I have never "defended" Bush without reservation. I have, on
occasion, expressed support for some of Obama's initiatives. I
don't agree with much of how he is trying to accomplish them
however.

The first step to getting this country back on track is to stop
the stupid finger pointing.

Eisboch


If that's the case, why bring up something that was always
obvious. I notice you didn't mention Bush the First's invasion
either. Or, Rumsfeld's or Cheney's previous involvement with
Saddam. You didn't mention the British establishing Iraq to begin
with either. The first step to getting this country back on track
is to be intellectually honest.


Based on the few posts of yours that I have read, I would
respectfully suggest that you lead the way.

Eisboch

Really? Please show me where I've done finger pointing without
cause. I've been vilified here for being female, not "beautiful",
"vacuous", a "typical" liberal (which I'm not even), told I'm not a
patent attorney, a liar, etc. I've hardly ever even responded to
those posters, especially not at that level.

No offense, but I don't have a clue who you are, what you are
professionally, what you look like or if you are male or female, nor
to I care. I've only read a handful of your posts. My take is that
your mind is pretty well made up about anything and everything.
Maybe wrong, but that's the impression I have.

Carry on. Didn't mean to interrupt. I have other things to do.

Eisboch

I expect most of what "things" you have to do, include being an ass.

You're more likely than Plume to be disagreeable while you disagree.


Eisboch is probably the most knowledgeable, level headed and caring
persons that dares post in this group. Of course you and a couple
others won't agree but that's to be expected.

Yup. Richard is too good for this group. And too much a gentleman.
He should stay away.
You are also a gentleman, so you should butt out.
Just saying it like it is.
Leave the group to those of us who know how to handle the lib scum.
These times of national crisis are not the times for reasonable men.
The tree of Freedom sometimes needs the watering of the blood of patriots.

***Are you better off than you were FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS ago?***

You mean before Bush spent 3 trillion dollars on Iraq and a trillion
on rich folk?

No, I'm not.

How about you, Jim?

On Feb 14, 3:56*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:53:20 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:



On 14/02/2010 12:50 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:30:11 -0500, John H
*wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk

actually he's not.

US troops are entering an area where terrorists are hiding behind
civilians

and no one killed more civilians than bush.

look at the hundreds of thousands dead in iraq

So is it OK that Obama does it because he is black or is it democrat?

LMAO...liberals are pathetic at rationalization.

and right wingers are great at cowardice. *they murder hundreds of
thousands in a useless war

then complain about a president who IS trying to protect america.

figures

And this is your supposed idea of protection?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/com...cle7026842.ece

On Feb 14, 3:57*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:47:01 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John *wrote in message
. ..
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H

And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

the part where bush lied to us about WMD's.

of course, right wing revisionists have written that out of the
record.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. *Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. *Go figure.

yeah. she believed bush's lies.

That argument never could fly.

And she had access to the same intelligence he did? How gullible she
is, then. Especially when she had the facts in front of her. And the
same went for your former president Clinton, Senator Kennedy and Kerry
as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i87cZ3Og6ts

On Feb 14, 4:20*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message

...



On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John *wrote in message
. ..
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H

And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. *Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. *Go figure.

So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.

--
Nom=de=Plume

D'Plume. Who has admitted to anything? Certainly no one is admitting
to making a 'mistake'

TopBassDog wrote:
On Feb 14, 4:20 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message

...



On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*
John H
And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.
What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution
Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.
So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.

--
Nom=de=Plume

D'Plume. Who has admitted to anything? Certainly no one is admitting
to making a 'mistake'

Talking to reds just encourages them to talk some more.
Why give them a forum? They can blog at moveon.org or the NYT or NBC
and drown in their own misery without subjecting us to their whining.

'Bama - The liberal who can't hide his true colors

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:53:34 -0600, Jim wrote:

TopBassDog wrote:
On Feb 14, 4:20 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message

...



On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*
John H
And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.
What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution
Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.
So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.

--
Nom=de=Plume

D'Plume. Who has admitted to anything? Certainly no one is admitting
to making a 'mistake'

Talking to reds just encourages them to talk some more.
Why give them a forum? They can blog at moveon.org or the NYT or NBC
and drown in their own misery without subjecting us to their whining.

'Bama - The liberal who can't hide his true colors

You are just about the dumbest stump in rec.boats. Challenging Snotty
for the crown.

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Feb 14, 3:57 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:47:01 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
. ..
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H

And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

the part where bush lied to us about WMD's.

of course, right wing revisionists have written that out of the
record.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.

yeah. she believed bush's lies.

That argument never could fly.

And she had access to the same intelligence he did? How gullible she
is, then. Especially when she had the facts in front of her. And the
same went for your former president Clinton, Senator Kennedy and Kerry
as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i87cZ3Og6ts


Yet more lies and blaming on everyone but Bush/Cheney (the torture
promoter).
--
Nom=de=Plume

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Feb 14, 4:20 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message

...



On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
. ..
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H

And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.

So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.

--
Nom=de=Plume

D'Plume. Who has admitted to anything? Certainly no one is admitting
to making a 'mistake'


They've all admitted to making an error in judgement (except Obama and a few
others who was opposed to it). More revisionistic bs from the right... you
can't just accept the fact that Bush invaded for absolutely no reason with
made up intelligence.
--
Nom=de=Plume

On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:21:23 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Feb 14, 3:57 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:47:01 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
. ..
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H

And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

the part where bush lied to us about WMD's.

of course, right wing revisionists have written that out of the
record.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.

yeah. she believed bush's lies.

That argument never could fly.

And she had access to the same intelligence he did? How gullible she
is, then. Especially when she had the facts in front of her. And the
same went for your former president Clinton, Senator Kennedy and Kerry
as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i87cZ3Og6ts


Yet more lies and blaming on everyone but Bush/Cheney (the torture
promoter).

WAFJ(oke)

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:21:23 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Feb 14, 3:57 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:47:01 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
. ..
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H

And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC
when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

the part where bush lied to us about WMD's.

of course, right wing revisionists have written that out of the
record.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.

yeah. she believed bush's lies.

That argument never could fly.

And she had access to the same intelligence he did? How gullible she
is, then. Especially when she had the facts in front of her. And the
same went for your former president Clinton, Senator Kennedy and Kerry
as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i87cZ3Og6ts


Yet more lies and blaming on everyone but Bush/Cheney (the torture
promoter).

WAFJ(oke)


I guess you don't watch the news...

--
Nom=de=Plume