On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:23:09 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"D.Duck" wrote in message
m...
jps wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:21:51 -0500, "Eisboch"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

Please read previous response.

Why do people like yourself automatically jump to the conclusion
that a statement of fact that may illuminate a broader influence on
a controversial subject means that the author of that statement is a
"rightie" or Bush supporter? This is exactly the type of current
political animosity that has divided this country. Now-a-days you
are either left or right apparently. There's no middle ground
anymore.

I have never "defended" Bush without reservation. I have, on
occasion, expressed support for some of Obama's initiatives. I
don't agree with much of how he is trying to accomplish them
however.

The first step to getting this country back on track is to stop the
stupid finger pointing.

Eisboch


If that's the case, why bring up something that was always obvious. I
notice you didn't mention Bush the First's invasion either. Or,
Rumsfeld's or Cheney's previous involvement with Saddam. You didn't
mention the British establishing Iraq to begin with either. The first
step to getting this country back on track is to be intellectually
honest.


Based on the few posts of yours that I have read, I would respectfully
suggest that you lead the way.

Eisboch

Really? Please show me where I've done finger pointing without cause.
I've been vilified here for being female, not "beautiful", "vacuous", a
"typical" liberal (which I'm not even), told I'm not a patent attorney,
a liar, etc. I've hardly ever even responded to those posters,
especially not at that level.

No offense, but I don't have a clue who you are, what you are
professionally, what you look like or if you are male or female, nor to
I care. I've only read a handful of your posts. My take is that your
mind is pretty well made up about anything and everything. Maybe
wrong, but that's the impression I have.

Carry on. Didn't mean to interrupt. I have other things to do.

Eisboch

I expect most of what "things" you have to do, include being an ass.

You're more likely than Plume to be disagreeable while you disagree.


Eisboch is probably the most knowledgeable, level headed and caring
persons that dares post in this group. Of course you and a couple others
won't agree but that's to be expected.


Never said he was unknowledgeable, crazy, or uncaring. He does seem to jump
to conclusions based on minimal observations, which is what he said.

Richard always makes a point of saying "I don't give a ****" so why
"caring" has leaked into the discussion is a mystery. Donald Duck has
blessed Eisboch with character qualities that simply don't exist.

In my second-hand experience of reading his recountings, he's a
self-absorbed, sour headed curmudgeon. Don't try to sell him anything
unless you're a famous musician or suffer from low-self esteem.
Otherwise, he'll bite your head off for sport.