On 1/26/10 2:10 PM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 26, 1:31 pm, wrote:


If you step on the property, you're trespassing.

Nope. No trespassing sign, no trespass.



Your stupidity is exceeded only by your ignorance of the law.
And, of course, you wouldn't know whether there was or was not the
appropriate signage on the property.

On 1/26/2010 2:16 PM, Harry wrote:
On 1/26/10 2:10 PM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 26, 1:31 pm, wrote:


If you step on the property, you're trespassing.

Nope. No trespassing sign, no trespass.



Your stupidity is exceeded only by your ignorance of the law.
And, of course, you wouldn't know whether there was or was not the
appropriate signage on the property.

Harry, here in Canada we don't have to resort to guns just because
someone trespasses. What is wrong with you Americans.

If you keep this up, I won't invite you up to Halifax.

On Jan 26, 2:16*pm, Harry wrote:
On 1/26/10 2:10 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:31 pm, *wrote:

If you step on the property, you're trespassing.

Nope. No trespassing sign, no trespass.

Your stupidity is exceeded only by your ignorance of the law.
And, of course, you wouldn't know whether there was or was not the
appropriate signage on the property.

Oh, yes I would!!!

In article d205dc0e-94b5-444d-95eb-
, says...

On Jan 26, 2:16*pm, Harry wrote:
On 1/26/10 2:10 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:31 pm, *wrote:

If you step on the property, you're trespassing.

Nope. No trespassing sign, no trespass.

Your stupidity is exceeded only by your ignorance of the law.
And, of course, you wouldn't know whether there was or was not the
appropriate signage on the property.

Oh, yes I would!!!

That much I do know Harry, there *are* eyes on you.

Scotty

On 1/26/10 2:57 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In articled205dc0e-94b5-444d-95eb-
, says...

On Jan 26, 2:16 pm, wrote:
On 1/26/10 2:10 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:31 pm, wrote:

If you step on the property, you're trespassing.

Nope. No trespassing sign, no trespass.

Your stupidity is exceeded only by your ignorance of the law.
And, of course, you wouldn't know whether there was or was not the
appropriate signage on the property.

Oh, yes I would!!!

That much I do know Harry, there *are* eyes on you.

Scotty


Right.

snerk

On 1/26/10 2:54 PM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 26, 2:16 pm, wrote:
On 1/26/10 2:10 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:31 pm, wrote:

If you step on the property, you're trespassing.

Nope. No trespassing sign, no trespass.

Your stupidity is exceeded only by your ignorance of the law.
And, of course, you wouldn't know whether there was or was not the
appropriate signage on the property.

Oh, yes I would!!!


Not bloody likely.

On Jan 26, 3:09*pm, Harry wrote:
On 1/26/10 2:54 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 2:16 pm, *wrote:
On 1/26/10 2:10 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:31 pm, * *wrote:

If you step on the property, you're trespassing.

Nope. No trespassing sign, no trespass.

Your stupidity is exceeded only by your ignorance of the law.
And, of course, you wouldn't know whether there was or was not the
appropriate signage on the property.

Oh, yes I would!!!

Not bloody likely.

Harry, I told you. If you like, I'll post a picture of YOU getting in
your Toyota in your driveway.

On 1/26/10 3:35 PM, Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 26, 3:09 pm, wrote:
On 1/26/10 2:54 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 2:16 pm, wrote:
On 1/26/10 2:10 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:31 pm, wrote:

If you step on the property, you're trespassing.

Nope. No trespassing sign, no trespass.

Your stupidity is exceeded only by your ignorance of the law.
And, of course, you wouldn't know whether there was or was not the
appropriate signage on the property.

Oh, yes I would!!!

Not bloody likely.

Harry, I told you. If you like, I'll post a picture of YOU getting in
your Toyota in your driveway.


Y-A-W-N.

Now, if you had a legitimate photo of me getting into Salma Hayek or
Penelope Cruz, hell, I'd pay for a copy.

On Jan 26, 3:41*pm, Harry wrote:
On 1/26/10 3:35 PM, Loogypicker wrote:





On Jan 26, 3:09 pm, *wrote:
On 1/26/10 2:54 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 2:16 pm, * *wrote:
On 1/26/10 2:10 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:31 pm, * * *wrote:

If you step on the property, you're trespassing.

Nope. No trespassing sign, no trespass.

Your stupidity is exceeded only by your ignorance of the law.
And, of course, you wouldn't know whether there was or was not the
appropriate signage on the property.

Oh, yes I would!!!

Not bloody likely.

Harry, I told you. If you like, I'll post a picture of YOU getting in
your Toyota in your driveway.

Y-A-W-N.

Just say the word, I'll post it right here in rec.boats! I mean it,
Harry, go ahead.

On Jan 26, 4:42*pm, Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 26, 3:41*pm, Harry wrote:



On 1/26/10 3:35 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 3:09 pm, *wrote:
On 1/26/10 2:54 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 2:16 pm, * *wrote:
On 1/26/10 2:10 PM, Loogypicker wrote:

On Jan 26, 1:31 pm, * * *wrote:

If you step on the property, you're trespassing.

Nope. No trespassing sign, no trespass.

Your stupidity is exceeded only by your ignorance of the law.
And, of course, you wouldn't know whether there was or was not the
appropriate signage on the property.

Oh, yes I would!!!

Not bloody likely.

Harry, I told you. If you like, I'll post a picture of YOU getting in
your Toyota in your driveway.

Y-A-W-N.

Just say the word, I'll post it right here in rec.boats! I mean it,
Harry, go ahead.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hmm, that seemed to shut Harry up........