"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:59:19 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:40:24 -0500, bpuharic wrote:


There was a one year period of 20% during the Reagan administration
but it was back to 38% when he left.
That is not exactly what you posted or what you implied.

Did you expect anything else from our newest far left lying loon?

guess you didn't know the dems, under carter, raised capital gains to
almost 40%

http://www.urban.org/publications/1000519.html


And what was inflation under Carter? Huge tax increase that inflation.

On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:58:04 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:59:19 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:40:24 -0500, bpuharic wrote:


There was a one year period of 20% during the Reagan administration
but it was back to 38% when he left.
That is not exactly what you posted or what you implied.

Did you expect anything else from our newest far left lying loon?

guess you didn't know the dems, under carter, raised capital gains to
almost 40%

http://www.urban.org/publications/1000519.html


And what was inflation under Carter? Huge tax increase that inflation.

and what is the cost of being unemployed, courtesy of 'free market'
economics? what's the cost of 10 years with no increase in jobs? of 10
years of no pay increases?

how's that working out?

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:58:04 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:59:19 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:40:24 -0500, bpuharic wrote:


There was a one year period of 20% during the Reagan administration
but it was back to 38% when he left.
That is not exactly what you posted or what you implied.

Did you expect anything else from our newest far left lying loon?

guess you didn't know the dems, under carter, raised capital gains to
almost 40%

http://www.urban.org/publications/1000519.html


And what was inflation under Carter? Huge tax increase that inflation.

and what is the cost of being unemployed, courtesy of 'free market'
economics? what's the cost of 10 years with no increase in jobs? of 10
years of no pay increases?

how's that working out?



And where is that the Republicans fault. Nafta was a Dem POTUS signed
thing. We have been moving jobs out of country a lot longer than 8 years.
We stopped teaching shop classes 40 years ago. Where at the kids going to
learn how to be non college prep students? Dem and Republican controlled
Congresses have never stepped up and told China that every Tariff they
impose on imports will be matched by us on their exports.

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:58:04 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:




And where is that the Republicans fault. Nafta was a Dem POTUS signed
thing. We have been moving jobs out of country a lot longer than 8 years.
We stopped teaching shop classes 40 years ago. Where at the kids going to
learn how to be non college prep students? Dem and Republican controlled
Congresses have never stepped up and told China that every Tariff they
impose on imports will be matched by us on their exports.


Bill, you just can't argue with the liberals. They have a spin for almost
everything, and when they don't they just revert to name calling. Heck,
look at Olbermann the other day? Wow, I've never seen such name calling on
the airwaves. He's a perfect example.

Besides, if we all just gave up on trying to argue with them, maybe this
place would revert back to being more boat oriented? It's a lot like
filtering harry. Since most folks here now have him KF'd, he's as good as
castrated (if he wasn't already) g.

--Mike

"mgg" wrote in message
...


"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:58:04 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:




And where is that the Republicans fault. Nafta was a Dem POTUS signed
thing. We have been moving jobs out of country a lot longer than 8
years. We stopped teaching shop classes 40 years ago. Where at the kids
going to learn how to be non college prep students? Dem and Republican
controlled Congresses have never stepped up and told China that every
Tariff they impose on imports will be matched by us on their exports.


Bill, you just can't argue with the liberals. They have a spin for almost
everything, and when they don't they just revert to name calling. Heck,
look at Olbermann the other day? Wow, I've never seen such name calling on
the airwaves. He's a perfect example.

Besides, if we all just gave up on trying to argue with them, maybe this
place would revert back to being more boat oriented? It's a lot like
filtering harry. Since most folks here now have him KF'd, he's as good as
castrated (if he wasn't already) g.

--Mike


You'll note that not a single person refuted what Olbermann said. Not a
single thing.


--
Nom=de=Plume

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"mgg" wrote in message
...


Bill, you just can't argue with the liberals. They have a spin for almost
everything, and when they don't they just revert to name calling. Heck,
look at Olbermann the other day? Wow, I've never seen such name calling
on the airwaves. He's a perfect example.

Besides, if we all just gave up on trying to argue with them, maybe this
place would revert back to being more boat oriented? It's a lot like
filtering harry. Since most folks here now have him KF'd, he's as good as
castrated (if he wasn't already) g.

--Mike



You'll note that not a single person refuted what Olbermann said. Not a
single thing.

Why? Not worth the time or energy. His comments the other night are the
perfect example
of the "wrestling with a pig" analogy. He makes a bunch of claims, unique
Olbermannisms, then his huge, elitist ego expects a response. No halfway
intelligent person would bother and it offends him.

I watch his comedy show occasionally for entertainment value only. I laugh
at him.
There are other liberal thinkers that I have much more genuine respect for.

Eisboch

nom=de=plume wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...
"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:58:04 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:
And where is that the Republicans fault. Nafta was a Dem POTUS signed
thing. We have been moving jobs out of country a lot longer than 8
years. We stopped teaching shop classes 40 years ago. Where at the kids
going to learn how to be non college prep students? Dem and Republican
controlled Congresses have never stepped up and told China that every
Tariff they impose on imports will be matched by us on their exports.

Bill, you just can't argue with the liberals. They have a spin for almost
everything, and when they don't they just revert to name calling. Heck,
look at Olbermann the other day? Wow, I've never seen such name calling on
the airwaves. He's a perfect example.

Besides, if we all just gave up on trying to argue with them, maybe this
place would revert back to being more boat oriented? It's a lot like
filtering harry. Since most folks here now have him KF'd, he's as good as
castrated (if he wasn't already) g.

--Mike


You'll note that not a single person refuted what Olbermann said. Not a
single thing.



"Mike's" area of boating expertise was one post in which he said he took
his kid water-skiing. If the little **** weren't attacking those who
disagree with him politically, he'd have nothing to post.

nom=de=plume wrote:
"mgg" wrote in message
...

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
...
"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:58:04 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:
And where is that the Republicans fault. Nafta was a Dem POTUS signed
thing. We have been moving jobs out of country a lot longer than 8
years. We stopped teaching shop classes 40 years ago. Where at the kids
going to learn how to be non college prep students? Dem and Republican
controlled Congresses have never stepped up and told China that every
Tariff they impose on imports will be matched by us on their exports.

Bill, you just can't argue with the liberals. They have a spin for almost
everything, and when they don't they just revert to name calling. Heck,
look at Olbermann the other day? Wow, I've never seen such name calling on
the airwaves. He's a perfect example.

Besides, if we all just gave up on trying to argue with them, maybe this
place would revert back to being more boat oriented? It's a lot like
filtering harry. Since most folks here now have him KF'd, he's as good as
castrated (if he wasn't already) g.

--Mike


You'll note that not a single person refuted what Olbermann said. Not a
single thing.


Because they were laughing so hard at him, that's why. He came
completely un-hinged.

Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
...

On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:58:04 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
...

On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:59:19 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:


In ,
says...

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:40:24 -0500, wrote:


There was a one year period of 20% during the Reagan administration
but it was back to 38% when he left.
That is not exactly what you posted or what you implied.

Did you expect anything else from our newest far left lying loon?

guess you didn't know the dems, under carter, raised capital gains to
almost 40%

http://www.urban.org/publications/1000519.html


And what was inflation under Carter? Huge tax increase that inflation.

and what is the cost of being unemployed, courtesy of 'free market'
economics? what's the cost of 10 years with no increase in jobs? of 10
years of no pay increases?

how's that working out?



And where is that the Republicans fault. Nafta was a Dem POTUS signed
thing. We have been moving jobs out of country a lot longer than 8 years.
We stopped teaching shop classes 40 years ago. Where at the kids going to
learn how to be non college prep students? Dem and Republican controlled
Congresses have never stepped up and told China that every Tariff they
impose on imports will be matched by us on their exports.



Good point on the tariffs. I'm not sure if that is true, but if it
is...good! The Chinese will often subsidize an offset to "cover" the
tariffs. The end result is that we pay the same and the government
collects the tariffs - and hopefully puts the money to work.